British Media Goes Wild: Now Russia Sends Troops, Military Bases, S-300 Systems And Kalibr Missiles To Libya

thats not how a S-300 looks like…….oh UK you are sutch a silly islamic state….xD

Their governments destroyed the country, which triggered the migration in the first place. Now they are trying to accuse Moscow for new wave of migrants!! WTF

I have no idea how the European citizens tolerate these kinds of news. In fact, they will digest this bullshit. Europeans are living zombies without brain.

US/Israel/UK/France/Nato got what they are looking for with their abuses since too long

US is an Arrogant money spender,

Russians are smart thinkers

ALL THE COUNTRIES THAT ..NATO.. HAS BOMBED SHOULD GET S-300 SYSTEMS

Go Russia! US and NATO can only destroy. Russia rebuilds.

lol, amazing how they are trying to blame Syria on Russia.

Do you remember what Libya was like, before Nato invaded? Next she will be telling us Russia has invaded Iraq. Forgetting, the lies old Blair told in Parliament, concerning Iraq.

>>“What Putin is doing in Libya is straight out of his playbook for Syria and Crimea before that. He sees ungoverned space and is taking it to exact maximum influence over the West. The fact is we are extremely vulnerable to both immigration flows and oil shock from Libya,” the unnamed source commented.<<

Maybe if Theresa May's predecessor hadn't bombed Syria into the unstable non-state that it currently is you wouldn't have this current problem/vulnerability. It's like Western governments have lost the ability to think before they act, like they are only emotionally driven these days. No wonder you're shaking in your designer shoes so much for a guy who leads a country with the economy the size of France. Putin at least thinks his moves through before he acts. Well, most of the time. In the land of the blind that means he's the one eyed man.

If that is true, good for the people of libya since russia can help them to attain peaceful sulutions slowly but surely, because they have the best diplomacy for every political factions of libya

In fact migrant will be stop and people can live a normal life again

http://www.voltairenet.org/article203382.html

International relations: the calm before the storm?

by Thierry Meyssan

All international problems are currently suspended, awaiting the results of the US mid-term elections. The partisans of the old international order are gambling on a change of majority in Congress and a rapid destitution of President Trump. If the man in the White House holds fast, the protagonists of the war against Syria will have to admit defeat and move on to other battle fields. On the other hand, if Donald Trump should lose the elections, the war on Syria will immediately be revived by the United Kingdom.

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | DAMASCUS (SYRIA) | 9 OCTOBER 2018

عربي ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΆ ESPAÑOL FRANÇAIS ITALIANO PORTUGUÊS РУССКИЙ TÜRKÇE DEUTSCH

The current situation – extending from the Russian response to the destruction of its Ilyuchin-20 to the US mid-term elections on 6 November – is uncertain. All the protagonists of the war in Syria are waiting to see whether the White House will be able to pursue its policy of breaking away from the current international order, or if Congress will become the opposition and immediately trigger the process for the destitution of President Trump.

The origins of the war

It has become clear that the initial project by the United States, the United Kingdom, Israël, Saudi Arabia and Qatar will not be realised. The same goes for France and Turkey, two powers that entered the war against Syria somewhat later.

What we need to remember is not the way in which we were informed about the start of the events, but what we have discovered about them since. The demonstrations in Deraa were presented as a « spontaneous revolt » against « dictatorial repression », but we now know that they had been in preparation for a long time [1].

We also need to free ourselves of the illusion that all the members of a Coalition, united in order to achieve the same goal, share the same strategy. Whatever the influence of one or the other, each State conserves its own history, its own interests and its own war objectives.

The United States pursued the strategy of Admiral Arthur Cebrowski, which was the destruction of the State structures in the Greater Middle East [2]. For this they relied upon the United Kingdom, which implemented Tony Blair’s strategy aimed at placing the Muslim Brotherhood in power throughout the region [3]. And also on Israël, which rebooted the strategy of Oded Yinon [4] and David Wurmser [5] for regional domination. The necessary weapons were stored in advance by Saudi Arabia in the Omar mosque [6]. Qatar stepped in by inventing the story about the children whose nails were torn out.

At that time, Saudi Arabia was not seeking to impose a new form of politics on Syria, nor even to overthrow its government. Riyadh’s intention was exclusively to prevent a non-Sunni from becoming President. By some strange historical evolution, the Wahhabites, who, two centuries ago, considered both Sunnis and Chiites as heretics and called for their extermination if they failed to repent, are today presenting themselves as the defenders of the Sunnis and the killers of the Chiites.

As for the tiny emirate of Qatar, it was exacting its revenge after the interruption of its gas pipeline in Syria [7].

France, which should have taken part in the conspiracy by virtue of the Lancaster House agreements, was sidelined because of its unexpected initiatives in Libya. The Minister for Foreign Affairs, Alain Juppé, attempted to push France into rejoining the conspirators, but the ambassador in Damascus, Eric Chevallier, who could see the distortion of facts on the ground, resisted as far as humanly possible [8].

When France was once again admitted to the group conspiracy, it continued its 1915 objective of the colonisation of Syria, pursuing the Sykes-Picot-Sazonov agreements. Just as the French mandate over Syria was considered to be transitory compared with the lasting colonisation of Algeria [9], it is considered, in the 21st century, as secondary to control of the Sahel. Besides which, while attempting to realise its old engagement, Paris pushed for the creation of a national home for the Kurds, on the model used by the British in 1917 for the Jews in Palestine. In order to do so, it allied itself with Turkey [10] which, in the name of Atatürk’s « national oath » [11], invaded the North of Syria in order to create a State to which the Turkish Kurds could be expelled.

While the war objectives of these first four aggressors are mutually compatible, those of the latter two are not compatible with the others.

Besides which, France, the United Kingdom and Turkey are three old colonial powers. All three are now trying to impose their power over the same throne. The war against Syria has thus reactivated their old rivalries.

““What Putin is doing in Libya is straight out of his playbook for Syria..”

What the Sun is doing here is straight out of its playbook for a population that has never been so ignorant and intellectually crippled by terrorist medias – population that they can rob simply by writing ravings that exploit its fears.

The Daesh episode within the war against Syria and Iraq

At the end of 2013, the Pentagon revised its plans within the framework of the Cebrowski strategy. It modified its initial plans, as revealed by Ralph Peters [12], and substituted the plan by Robin Wright for the creation of a « Sunnistan » straddling Syria and Iraq [13].

However, in September 2015, the deployment of the Russian army in Syria, as an obstacle to the creation of « Sunnistan » by Daesh, ruined the projects of the six principal partners in the war.

The three years of war that followed had other objectives – on the one hand, to create a new state straddling Iraq and Syria within the framework of the Cebrowski strategy, and, on the other, to use Daesh to cut the Silk Road that Xi Jinping’s China were seeking to reactivate – thus maintaining continental domination over the « Western » part.

The Syrian / Russian victory and the reversal of the United States

The affair of the destruction of the Ilyuchin-20 on 17 September 2018 handed Russia the occasion to terminate this extended war and come to an agreement with the White House to stand against other aggressors. This is a rerun, on a smaller scale, of the Russian / US reaction to the Suez crisis of 1956 [14].

Moscow has not only given the Syrian Arab Army anti-aircraft missiles (S-300’s), but has also deployed an entire integrated surveillance system. As soon as this system is operational, and Syrian officers have been trained to use it, which will take three months at the most, it will be impossible for Western armies to over-fly the country without permission from Damascus [15].

President Trump announced in advance that he intends to withdraw US troops from Syria. He went back on this decision under pressure from the Pentagon, then agreed with his general officers to maintain pressure on Damascus as long as the United States were excluded from the peace negotiations in Sotchi. The deployment of the Russian armies – for which the White House had probably given its agreement – provided President Trump with the occasion of forcing the Pentagon to back off. It would have to withdraw its troops, but it could maintain the presence of its mercenaries (as it happens, these would be the Kurds and Arabs from the Democratic Forces) [16].

The Syrian Minister for Foreign Affairs, Walid el-Mouallem, speaking before the General Assembly of the UNO, demanded the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of the foreign forces of occupation, US, French and Turkish [17].

If the United States leave, then the French and Turkish troops will be unable to stay. The Israëlis would no longer be able to overfly and bomb the country. The British have already left.

However, Tel-Aviv, Paris and Ankara still hope that President Trump will lose the elections of 6 November and will be fired. They are therefore awaiting the results of this fateful election before they decide.

If it happens that Donald Trump should win the mid-term elections in Congress, another question will arise. If the Western powers give up on the battle in Syria, where will they go to continue their endless war? This is indeed a reality on which all experts agree – the Western ruling class has become so swamped in bad blood and hubris that it is unable to accept the idea of being geared back behind the new Asian powers.

Wisdom would dictate that once the war is lost, the aggressors should withdraw. But the intellectual disposition of the West prevents them from doing so. The war here will cease only when they find a new bone to gnaw on.

Only the United Kingdom has given its response any thought. It is clear by now that although London maintains its diplomatic pressure on Syria via the Small Group, its attention is already focused on the revival of the « Grand Game » which saw the Crown confront the Tsar throughout all of the 19th century. After having invented the Skripal affair, and on the model of the « Zinoviev Letter » [18], London has just ’caught’ the Russian Exterior Intelligence Services red-handed in their attempt to discover what is being plotted against them by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPWC).

This geopolitical doctrine is independent of the events which serve as its pretext. The « Grand Game » was the strategy of the British Empire. Its resumption by the current United Kingdom is the consequence of Brexit and the policy of « Global Britain ». Just as in the 19th century, this anti-Russian configuration will lead in time to an exacerbated rivalry between London and Paris. On the contrary, should Theresa May fail, along with the questions concerning Brexit and the maintenance of the United Kingdom in the European Union, all these projections will be cancelled.

If France is now studying the possibility of leaving the Middle East in order to concentrate on the Sahel, the position of the United States is a lot more problematic. Since 9/11, the Pentagon has enjoyed a certain autonomy. The ten combat Commanders of the armed forces no longer receive orders from the president of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, but only from the Secretary of Defense.

With time, they have become the veritable « viceroys » of the « American Empire » – a function which they do not wish to see reduced by President Trump. Some of them, like the Commander for South America (SouthCom) [19], intend to continue with the Cebrowski strategy, despite the admonitions of the White House.

So there remains much uncertainty. The only positive step taken concerns Daesh – for three years, the Western powers pretended to be fighting this terrorist organisation, while at the same time supplying them with weapons. Today, Donald Trump has ordered the cessation of this experience of an explicitly terrorist state, the Caliphate, and the Syrian and Russian armies have pushed the jihadists back. The Westerners have no desire to see their friends, the « moderate rebels », now qualified as « terrorists », turn up in their countries en masse. Consequently, whether they admit it or not, they hope they will all be killed in Syria.

It is the US mid-term elections which will decide whether the war continues in Syria or move on to another battle field.

Thierry Meyssan

Translation

Pete Kimberley

[1] “Aggression disguised as civil wars”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Pete Kimberley, Voltaire Network, 27 February 2018.

[2] The Pentagon’s New Map, Thomas P. M. Barnett, Putnam Publishing Group, 2004. “The US military project for the world”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Pete Kimberley, Voltaire Network, 22 August 2017.

[3] “Tony Blair speech at the World Affairs Council in Los Angeles”, by Tony Blair, Voltaire Network, 1 August 2006. When Progressives Treat with Reactionaries. The British State’s flirtation with radical Islamism, Martin Bright, Policy Exchange, September 2004. “I had no choice but to leak”, Derek Pasquill, New Statesman, January 17, 2008.

[4] “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties (The “Yinon Plan”)”, by Oded Yinon, Translation Israel Shahak, Kivunim (Israel) , Voltaire Network, 1 February 1982.

[5] The plan A Clean Break : A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, July 2006, was attributed to its signatories, mainly Richard Perle and Douglas Feith. However, according to Feith, the text was drawn up by Wurmser, without the signatories having the opportunity to modify it. See “Credit for Israel Report Clarified”, Douglas Feith, Washington Post, September 16, 2004.

[6] Interview with General Anwar Al-Eshki by the BBC, in 2011. https://youtu.be/EGu3sh4MMK8.

[7] “Syria’s Pipelineistan war”, Pepe Escobar, Al-Jazeera, August 6, 2012. “Syria intervention plan fueled by oil interests, not chemical weapon concern”, Nafeez Ahmed, The Guardian, August 30, 2013. “​Syria attraction: Russia moving into Eastern Mediterranean oil bonanza”, William Engdhal, Russia Today, Januray 13, 2014. “Why the Arabs don’t want us in Syria”, Robert Kennedy Jr, Politico, February 23, 2016.

[8] “Alain Juppé accused by his own Administration of having falsified reports on Syria”, Translation Michele Stoddard , Voltaire Network, 22 March 2012.

[9] France, Syrie et Liban 1918-1946: Les ambiguïtés et les dynamiques de la relation mandataire, Nadine Méouchy, Presses de IFPO, 2013.

[10] Accord franco-turc – signed by Alain Juppé and Ahmet Davutoğlu, 2011, not published.

[11] “Misak-ı Milli Kararları”, Voltaire İletişim Ağı , 28 Ocak 1920.

[12] “Blood borders – How a better Middle East would look”, Colonel Ralph Peters, Armed Forces Journal, June 1, 2006.

[13] “Imagining a Remapped Middle East”, Robin Wright, The New York Times Sunday Review, September 8, 2013.

[14] “Will London, Paris and Tel-Aviv be sanctioned by Moscow and Washington?”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Pete Kimberley, Voltaire Network, 25 September 2018.

[15] “Implication of creating a modern integrated management of the Syrian air space”, by Valentin Vasilescu, Translation Anoosha Boralessa, Voltaire Network, 8 October 2018.

[16] “Trump eyeing Arab ‘boots on the ground’ to counter Iran in Syria”, Travis J. Tritten, Washington Examiner, September 29, 2018.

[17] “Remarks by Walid Al-Moualem to the 73rd Session of the United Nations General Assembly”, by Walid Al-Moualem, Voltaire Network, 29 September 2018.

[18] “The Skripal Affair: A Lie Too Far?”, by Michael Jabara Carley, Strategic Culture Foundation (Russia) , Voltaire Network, 23 April 2018.

[19] “Plan to overthrow the Venezuelan Dictatorship – “Masterstroke””, by Kurt W. Tidd, Voltaire Network, 23 February 2018. “The United States “Master Stroke” against Venezuela”, by Stella Calloni, Translation Pete Kimberley, Voltaire Network, 17 May 2018.

…just keep Mr. Putin out and far away from Military matters.

Russia is trying to contain Europe and surround it with military Kalibr bases.

The next Russian military base is planned on Kreta in the middle of Mediterranian to controle British sun beaches on the excuse “Russia was invited by the local government of Kreta”.

Source: The Sun newspaper. That explains it all.

Too f’n bad. Deal with it.

Well, Libya would be much better place if Russians came before Qaddafi was killed

Haha, so the Zionists were responsible for the taking down of a Russian plane with the murder of Russian personal, Russia responds and has basically made the Syrian airspace a no go area for the Zionists and now, as usual, the Zionists try and get others to do their dirty work. The Sun newspaper is owned by Zionist Murdoch and now he ramps up his anti Russian bullshit, lol, and people actually buy and read this rag of a paper..

Hysterical.

The owners and management of the Sun newspaper have an IQ of 10-. Their readers have an IQ of 1-. This article was written for them. I am surprised that South front would reprint such an article.

Oh wow i needed a good laugg this morning.

I will take to liberty to remind our collègues at the sun, that it was in fact uk france usa.and canada that destabilized libya in the first place, that your morronic actions caused the migrant crisis.

Hah it gets even funnier, YOU knew what you were doing in libya, you caused the migrant crisis on purpose. You robbed libya blind, sent the army’s arsenal to al nusra in syria. All under the watchful eyes of our benevolent governments.

To all of you who beleive this article. Its toilet paper, in fact its an insult to shit to scrape it off your rectum with this “paper”.

This is a projection of the evils our governments are doing.

We have done all these things to ourselves. Russia did nothing.

…. and keep on coming, Russia, all the way down.

You FUKUS types make like FUKOFF types

Don’t like another country with bases in the Mediterranean? Set the example by leaving Gibraltar as soon as possible.

“According to the outlet, the unnamed intelligence officials……”

I stopped reading right there.

I suppose it never occurs to them to consider that Libya was wholly stable under the rule of Muammar Gaddafi until, Lo and Behold! France, Little Britain and US decided to bomb the Country out of existence so that, according to themselves, they could remove Gaddafi from Office. If they really wanted to remove him they could have assassinated him on any one of numerous occasions throughout the previous few years and/or at any time since but no, the real reason was to crate outright conflagration throughout North Africa all of which has led to the surging numbers of Refugees and Migrants to Europe. The Stupid Fuxxers couldn’e even manage a change of Government in Libya without causing wholesale death and destruction together with uncontrolled migrant flows into Europe. You Reap What You Sow but here, these geniuses sowed Carrot Seeds and grew Nettles.