0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,000 $
OCTOBER 2024

Could Crisis In The Middle East Cost Kamala Harris Election?

Support SouthFront

Could Crisis In The Middle East Cost Kamala Harris Election?

Click to see the full-size image

Written by Ahmed Adel, Cairo-based geopolitics and political economy researcher

Support for Democratic candidate Kamala Harris among Arab-American and Muslim voters, as well as among progressive and young voters, has plummeted in recent weeks due to her backing of Israel’s military actions in Gaza and Lebanon, putting her victory in key states like Michigan at risk.

On September 9, Quinnipiac University released its final polls before the US general elections. The survey, which covered three of the most critical states key to the aspirations of Harris and Republican Donald Trump, showed a notable decline for the Democrat in the voting intention of those surveyed, but none more so than in Michigan. There, the current vice president went from having 50% of voting intention in September (compared to Trump’s 45%) to obtaining 47% in October, with the Republican moving into the lead with 50%.

According to many analysts, the decline is due to Harris’ supposed conservative shift in recent weeks, which has seen her campaigning with former Republican Liz Cheney and boasting about the support of her father, former Vice President Dick Cheney, the architect of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, to toughening her rhetoric on Latin American immigrants and, especially, her alignment with Israel at a time when the Jewish state is expanding its airstrikes against Lebanon, Syria and Yemen.

By backing President Joe Biden’s staunch defence of Israel, Harris has suffered in the voting intention among the young and progressive electorate, but especially among Arab American and Muslim voters. The latter has historically voted for Democratic candidates in every election.

Michigan has the largest number of voters who are descendants or immigrants from Arab countries. It is one of the key states in Harris’ campaign to win the election. If Harris does not win Michigan, which Biden won by three points in 2020 but Hillary Clinton marginally lost in 2016, her path to obtaining the 370 Electoral College votes becomes almost impossible since, according to all the polls, the Republican is showing great strength in other Democrat states such as Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

Harris’s refusal to distance herself from Biden’s absolute support for Netanyahu could be catastrophic for the Democratic candidate.

Under other circumstances, Michigan might have facilitated Harris’ victory, but this is one of the most disconcerting aspects of her campaign: the fact that she has not sought to reach out to that electorate – even if for electoral reasons, not moral ones – that is critical of Israel’s actions. It is recalled that Harris’ campaign refused even to have a Palestinian speaker at the Democratic Convention, despite the fact that they invited Israeli speakers. Harris herself has refused to commit to stopping the shipment of American weapons to Israel if she wins the election.

While the Arab and Muslim electorate represents 4% of Michigan’s total population, which translates into 200,000 potential voters, Trump’s margin of victory over Clinton in 2016 was just 10,000 votes. If the shift in voting intention materialises, it could give the election to the former president.

Today, according to the latest polls, not only does Trump lead Harris among the general electorate in Michigan, but he also leads her among the Arab and Muslim population, something that no one could have imagined just two years ago. In the past, that electorate has leaned overwhelmingly Democratic in every presidential election, including in 2020, when Biden captured 60% of that vote, with Trump getting just 37%.

The reason for such an abrupt change in just four years has an obvious explanation – Biden’s support for Israel’s military action in the Middle East, which has left tens of thousands of dead in Gaza and Lebanon in the last year, most of them civilians. Voters see Biden and Harris talking about a ceasefire in Gaza, but not only do they fail to achieve it, they continue to send weapons to Israel.

Trump has promised in this campaign that he will re-implement the executive order he established in 2017, which prohibits the entry into the country of citizens from a series of Muslim-majority countries. But for Arab-Americans, this is not comparable to Biden and Harris financing and supporting Israel.

Many pro-Palestine voters prefer Trump as they see him as a pragmatic politician, believing that while the Republican has a good relationship with Netanyahu, he would not hesitate to get rid of the Israeli prime minister if he became politically inconvenient for him. On the contrary, Biden has repeatedly said throughout his career that he considers himself a “Zionist” who always defends Israel, leading many voters to believe that he will not change his mind regarding the continued sending of weapons to Israel instead of deepening a diplomatic solution.

In many cases, the shift of this electorate towards Trump is explained by the logic of the lesser evil, and it is not illogical that the desire to punish Biden and Harris for allowing Israel to bomb their countries of origin daily than any other argument.

Other voters in that group, on the other hand, have decided to support the independent candidate Jill Stein, who is expected to obtain almost a third of the votes from Arabs and Muslims in Michigan. Again, this would be catastrophic for Harris because many of these voters traditionally support the Democrats. However, Stein is the best option for these voters because she is the only candidate who has openly criticised Netanyahu.

It is inexplicable that Harris was recruited at the last minute after Biden’s debacle in the presidential debate with Trump. She now wants to distance herself from the unpopular Biden administration but maintains the same position on most issues, including Israel. It is clearly a bad electoral strategy. But if there is one thing that Washington cannot object to, it is the war machine, and Harris is proving it, even if it hurts her election chances.

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Name

dems don’t need votes or voters to win an election….

hash
hashed
Prigozhin

if these women are elected, congratulations united states! and you maniacal people, you would start the third world war and you will have to pay the price at any cost

hash
hashed
Wallter

nah she’ll will lose it anyway.

hash
failed
anon

who cares? big bag of bu**er all a v. big bag of bu**er all b. shabbos goy a v. shabbos goy b. you can vote for the pro genocide pro zionist candidate, or if you prefer it, you can vote for the pro zionist pro genocide candidate. you might as well vote for a stuffed animal. what do you think this is, a democracy or something? voting in elections is like the grown up version of writing letters to father xmas. the whole tawdry degrading spectacle is totally irrelevant to the us people.

hash
hashed
Foghorn Leghorn

it already has. kamala cock-a-doodle-doo harris can’t keep her piehole shut. all she can do is make lots of noise, ruffle feathers and chit all over the place. i don’t think that bird brain should have the nuclear codex.

hash
none
Anonymous

as if anything legitimate matters with them

hash
hashed
Conan M

with the american economy on the brink of permanent collapse. does it really matter?… all politicians in washington and in the state capital(s) are blackmailed goyim that will die by their own sword!!! question for russia: why do you remain in the un/imf/world bank/opec prison cell, while your men, women and children are being slaughtered russia/eastern ukraine (family)???

Last edited 54 minutes ago by Conan M
Conan M

yet serving too many western master(s) in the process. russian federation you need to look in the mirror and ask yourself who you “are”?!!!…

Last edited 54 minutes ago by Conan M
8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x