Democratic tech experts posed as “Russian trolls” in a false flag operation to help Democrat Doug Jones defeat Republican Roy Moore in the Alabama Senate race in 2017, the NYT reported on December 19th.
“One participant in the Alabama project, Jonathon Morgan, is the chief executive of New Knowledge, a small cyber security firm that wrote a scathing account of Russia’s social media operations in the 2016 election that was released this week by the Senate Intelligence Committee.
An internal report on the Alabama effort, obtained by The New York Times, says explicitly that it “experimented with many of the tactics now understood to have influenced the 2016 elections.”
The project’s operators created a Facebook page on which they posed as conservative Alabamians, using it to try to divide Republicans and even to endorse a write-in candidate to draw votes from Mr. Moore. It involved a scheme to link the Moore campaign to thousands of Russian accounts that suddenly began following the Republican candidate on Twitter, a development that drew national media attention.
“We orchestrated an elaborate ‘false flag’ operation that planted the idea that the Moore campaign was amplified on social media by a Russian botnet,” the NYT report said.
According to Morgan, the so-called experiment was meant “to explore how certain online tactics worked, not to affect the election.”
The operatives were funded by billionaire Reid Hoffman, independently of Doug Jones. Hoffman gave the operatives $100,000 for their project, according to the NYT.
Immediately following the project, media outlets from Alabama and the entirety of US fell for the “false flag” operation and started perpetuating the false narrative in October 2017.
Roy Moore just picked up a whole bunch of twitter followers. But they ain't from around here, comrade. pic.twitter.com/vJBPVxqWIW
— The Ostrich (@ALostrich) October 16, 2017
The New York Post reported “Roy Moore flooded with fake Russian Twitter followers.” The report cited the Montgomery Advertiser, an Alabama affiliate of USA Today, which was first to run the story.
Mother Jones cited the same report in a story named “Russian Propagandists Are Pushing for Roy Moore to Win.” The article mentioned Hamilton 68 dashboard (operated by the nonpartisan Alliance for Securing Democracy) tracked the hashtag #alabamasenaterace along with “600 Twitter accounts linked to Russian influence operations.”
Analyst Bret Shafer stated that those “600 accounts push out 20,000 to 25,000 tweets every day.” By Election Day, those accounts tweeted out votejudgemoore.com the most.
Jonathon Morgan belonged to the Hamilton 68 dashboard group.
The Washington Post focused on the fact that Moore, turns out rightfully, blamed Democrats for the fake accounts.
The Daily Beast reported that “Shadowy Facebook Ads That Pushed Trump Are Back in Alabama.”
Moore’s campaign said that it had suspicions about interference:
“We did have suspicions that something odd was going on,” said Rich Hobson, Mr. Moore’s campaign manager. Mr. Hobson said that although he did not recall any hard evidence of interference, the campaign complained to Facebook about potential chicanery.
“Any and all of these things could make a difference,” Mr. Hobson said. “It’s definitely frustrating, and we still kick ourselves that Judge Moore didn’t win.”
Roy Moore was mocked on Twitter for his claims that there was interference.
The NYT report also mentioned “a generic page to draw conservative Alabamians” on Facebook funded by the project was contacted by Mac Watson, a write-in candidate for the election. According to him the page agreed to “boost” his campaign and kept in touch with him. Subsequently it helped him get interviews with major publications.
He admitted that the page “operators seemed determined to stay in the shadows.” The NYT further reported:
“Of dozens of conservative Alabamian-oriented pages on Facebook that he wrote to, only one replied. “You are in a particularly interesting position and from what we have read of your politics, we would be inclined to endorse you,” the unnamed operator of the page wrote. After Mr. Watson answered a single question about abortion rights as a sort of test, the page offered an endorsement, though no money.
“They never spent one red dime as far as I know on anything I did — they just kind of told their 400 followers, ‘Hey, vote for this guy,’” Mr. Watson said.
Mr. Watson never spoke with the page’s author or authors by phone, and they declined a request for meeting. But he did notice something unusual: his Twitter followers suddenly ballooned from about 100 to about 10,000. The Facebook page’s operators asked Mr. Watson whether he trusted anyone to set up a super PAC that could receive funding and offered advice on how to sharpen his appeal to disenchanted Republican voters.”
The page vanished immediately after the election.
It reportedly didn’t sway the election, but it seems that false flag operations involving “Russian trolls” may become a common tool in the US internal politics.
“Some will do whatever it takes to win,” said Dan Bayens, a Kentucky-based Republican consultant. “You’ve got Russia, which showed folks how to do it, you’ve got consultants willing to engage in this type of behavior and political leaders who apparently find it futile to stop it.”
There is no evidence that Mr. Jones sanctioned or was even aware of the social media project. Joe Trippi, a seasoned Democratic operative who served as a top advisor to the Jones campaign, said he had noticed the Russian bot swarm suddenly following Mr. Moore on Twitter. But he said it was impossible that a $100,000 operation had an impact on the race.
Mr. Trippi said he was nonetheless disturbed by the stealth operation. “I think the big danger is somebody in this cycle uses the dark arts of bots and social networks and it works,” he said. “Then we’re in real trouble,” the NYT report concluded.
All this Russia scaremongering is a false flag operated by CIA, MSM, Dems, Wall Street, meant to cover their meddling with Chinese big business controlled by the Chinese government.