Click to see full-size image
Written by Julian Macfarlane
Should the world fear American military technology?
In my last article, I explored why the US cannot hope to win a war against Russia or China.
I mostly focused on China. But much of what I wrote applies to Russia as well—especially a style of thinking that is “existential”, focusing on practical realities, as opposed to the virtual reality bubble that Americans live in.
Russia that gave us Dostoevsky and the Underground Man; America gives us the Disney Channel and Desperate Housewives.
The Russians recently downed a Reaper Drone off Crimea. This much-in-the news, electronic bird is one of those overpriced, over-rated, examples of technological redundancy that the US is regarding as a symbol of military superiority—the kind of much-ado-about-nothing wunderwaffen that is bankrupting the US economy.
When it went down, the drone was in a restricted area just 60 kilometers off Crimea with its transponder off. A transponder allows ground-based radars to identify intruders as friend or foe and, given the rules of engagement and their declaration that this area was off-limits, the Russians would have been justified in shooting the drone down.
The US has shot down civilian aircraft such as Iran Flight 655 with a lot less excuse.
However, instead, the Russians scrambled two Su27s to first identify it. The drone did go down but was not shot down.
Naturally, the Western media mob rushed to lynch the Russkies.
- CNBC: Russian jet collides with, downs U.S. drone over Black Sea
- Russian fighter jet forces down US drone over Black Sea
- Russian Jet Dumps Fuel On US Drone, Then Collides With It Over Black Sea
- The Su-27 rammed the American MQ-9 drone
How exactly did Russians bring the drone down?
While the Americans most likely have video of the entire incident, they haven’t released full footage, just a few seconds of one of the Su27s approaching in a climb from behind and appearing to jettison unneeded fuel – -which is standard military practice to lighten an aircraft before engagement.
This video is a segment and a teaser — pointedly repeated over and over again, apparently to get the mob excited and howling for blood.
Ramming?
The Media really like the image of desperate Russians ramming their Yak into a Heinkel.
Although the Russians did do some air-to-air ramming in WWII as the Japanese did, along with Brits and even Americans, this tactic often resulted in the loss of both aircraft and crew.
It is unlikely that an Su27 would attempt to “clip” the tail rotor of the drone since to do that it would have to use its nose, which is full of delicate electronics or wings which contain fuel. Either maneuver could result in the loss of a very expensive aircraft and its even more expensive pilot. You can rule ramming out.
Nor did the Su27 accidentally collide with the drone.
Illustrative Image
The Su27 was designed for supermaneuvrability.
Dumping fuel?
The Media have a thing about golden showers, as we saw with the Steele Dossier on Trump. And the Pentagon
Dumping fuel on an aerial opponent would be the military equivalent — a kind of kinky aviation fun—rarely dangerous.
It is not used in fighter-to-fighter combat as a tactic. As I have said that the Su27’s appears to be jettisoning fuel on approach, not to somehow damage the drone. In any case, the dump was well behind the drone and dissipates quickly— as you can see clearly from the video, Its purpose would be to improve their maneuverability in the case of a low speed target and enable a safe interception.
Although this drone can carry missiles and bombs for combat operations, its primary role is ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance). It is therefore designed for endurance, and loitering at long range. Obviously, there are tradeoffs for this performance profile — slow speed, long wings like a glider, a lot of fuel storage. The Reaper is not exactly a dogfight aircraft — and not built for hi-G maneuvers.
Click to see full-size image
If the Reaper were carrying on-board ordinance, the Su27s would have been justified in shooting it down. But it wasn’t— and they didn’t.
Had it been a Russian drone with its transponder off doing ISR in an area that the Americans had designated as combat zone off limits to regular air traffic, and close to an important military base, the USAF would have destroyed it without nary a by-your-leave.
In this case, the Su27s first priority was to drive the drone off. If they could get rid of it by forcing it into maneuvers it wasn’t built for, all the better.
They therefore likely engaged the aircraft— getting into firing position behind or approaching head-on — and the operator of the drone tried to avoid and evade.
This is not something that drone operators practice. They are not pilots trained for air-to-air combat; they are video gamers.
Wedding parties in Afghanistan don’t fight back.
Click to see full-size image
The Russians say the drone attempted a sharp maneuver and fell out of the sky—meaning it stalled and spun out.
Given the fact that Americans undoubtedly have a lot more video than the few seconds shown, there is no incentive for the Russians to lie. In fact, the Americans not releasing the full video supports not only Russian truthiness but the thesis that the Pentagon is egging the media mob on into Alex Jones mode.
Russian pilots are trained to a very high standard to exploit the full capabilities of their aircraft. And could easily get an inexperienced drone operator to over-react. I think the Russians knew what they were doing.
At the very least this was a very, very happy “accident”—for the Russians.
The US can no longer dictate the rules.
It is also— ipso facto— a warning to the Americans.
As a Judo and Combat Sambo expert, Putin understands strategic leverage very well.
In such martial arts, advantage comes from using your opponent’s weight and momentum against him. In other words, with a little help from your opponent, you render him helpless.
With the slo-mo destruction of the Zelensky regime, the failure of Western sanctions, a progressive military advantage in weaponry, committed public support at home intensified by attacks on Russian territory using American resources, and American economic failures, Russia now has the upper hand — or perhaps we should say, paw. It is saying: “Beware: this Bear can bite.”
Illustrative Image
Too expensive to use, too expensive to lose
In my last article, I pointed out that the US produces weaponry that is literally too expensive to lose.
This is a good example. You will see various costs for the Reaper Drone
The usually stated figure of $32 million is considered by many to be too much since it is at least twice as expensive as an F16.
In April 2021, the US defense department quoted the Australian government an estimated figure of $1.651 billion, when they enquired about buying 12 MQ-9 Reapers, along with the relevant equipment and supplies.
Ouch! $1.651 billion! How many wedding parties does that blow up?
Too expensive to lose indeed.
What the Russians have demonstrated is that ISR vehicles like the Reaper are useful only against enemies without resources. Yes, they can loiter for long hours at fairly high altitudes, but they are slow and easily detectable by radar. Yes, they can blow up kids — but a peer level adversary can take them down anytime.
With drone operators, quitting in droves, The RAF is reportedly recruiting video gamers as Reaper Operators. Get’m while they’re young.
The Independent
War for the US is a game. But a dehumanizing one. When virtual reality becomes real, it is a shock. For the Russians and Chinese, it is real from the start, which is why they do everything they can to avoid it.
Dumpster Diving in the Black Sea
As I have said, the Reaper drone is very expensive kit with all the latest add-ons.
So, if the Russians….
For the rest of article please click here to go to my Substack site. Please subscribe – it’s free. And please support SouthFront.
DEAR FRIENDS. IF YOU LIKE THIS TYPE OF CONTENT, SUPPORT SOUTHFRONT WORK :
MONERO (XMR): 86yfEHs6pkoDEKCxc6MAnQX8cVHmzhYxMVrNuwKgNmqpWK8dDxjgGnK8PtUNJMACbn6xEGxmRauNTHJhUJpg9Mwz8htBBND
BITCOIN (BTC):bc1qgu58lfszcpqu6fd8l98m378wgzugyg9y93lcym
BITCOIN CASH (BCH):qr28d80s5juzv2793k5jrq59xrl5fxd8qg9h3zlkk2
PAYPAL, WESTERN UNION etc: write to info@southfront.org , southfront90@list.ru
If you face any problems sending funds to the addresses given above, please contact us: info@southfront.org and southfront@list.ru. Also be aware that many email services such as Hotmail, Yahoo etc. may block correspondence from info@southfront.org and some others put it in spam.
If you want to support SouthFront but have no opportunity to do it via cryptocurrency, please contact us: info@southfront.org and southfront@list.ru.
I saw the video and the Russian jet DID come into contact with the drone. I don’t understand why Russia is lying about it. When Iran shot down one of those drones a few years ago, they said “Yea, we did it. Now kiss it.” Why does Russia act like they are afraid?
The drone operator panicked, that’s what really happened.
No it did not. Why do I know that? Really simple IMHO, try to hold your hand out of your car with a speed of more than 130 miles and try to just lightly touch a lamp post or a tree, something sturdy with it. You will either break your hand or even loose it. Imagine flying with speeds over 400 miles per hour and just lightly touching the thingy the Drone had. A part of the Drone would either be crushed or a part of the Russian Jet would be crushed, it would not just pull up, that’s imho just the high speed of the Russian Jet flying by. No way in hell, it was something different, again, try my example with the hand and you will instantly understand…
Also try squirting yourself with a jet washer, if there was enough speed difference a liquid could bend the prop. But there is also another thing about aircraft, they have turbulent vortices around them, if you flew close to something it could be unintentionally sucked in closer, you might kind of experience this passing trucks at speed. It surely would be very difficult to just bend a propellor tip intentionally, there would be a risk of serious damage when the other plane could move unpredictably, this was not pre-planned formation flying, and if contact was intentional, then was it the jet pilot trying to hit the drone or the drone operator trying to hit the jet? If the drone was attacking this was a hostile act by the US! As the video drops out at the critical moment who knows though, we can only credit the Russian account as being from the side with a better record of factual accuracy.
Even if the contact occurred after the second overflight of the plane, the video shows that the drone is still flying without any changes in flight parameters, so that alleged contact is not the cause of the drone’s crash…
after the hilarious decision of Biden to arrest Putin because of the crashed US drone, the questions are whether Biden will wear a cape when doing this, and if he can avoid falling over or defecating in the process
The ICC ‘arrest’ nonsense was simply to divert the sheeple’s attention from the drone incident, notice how fast the drone coverage vanish across the pretend Jewish controlled western MSM once the real facts started to come out.
No pilot fair game, V1 doodlebug or mq9 just let the interceptor do his job. Have fun and use for training who can down most -win an all inclusive trip 7 nights with family at a posh resort. These drones are collecting targeting info to kill civilians in the Donbass in addition to Russian troops.
An early Christmas present to Russia. From Uncle Sam with love if you wish.