Click to see the full-size image
Written by Damir Nazarov
Continuation of the theme of the fall of Aleppo and the interests of external actors. Let’s briefly try to understand the plans of Zionism from open sources of information.
Version one, the Zionists support the Syrian opposition and jihadists.
At the moment, the main arguments for such statements are the words of a certain Zionist university professor, who assured that he allegedly “is in constant contact with the leaders of the Syrian opposition.” Of course, he did not indicate names, names of groups, meeting places and forms of communication, he simply speculated on this topic, trying to cause a storm of emotion on the part of the media supporting the “Axis of Resistance” alliance.
From past events we remember how Zionists admitted to supporting jihadists and “moderate” insurgents. But there are several important nuances. The support was strictly limited to a narrow geographic area, that is, the Zionists acted in the south of Syria based on their interests in preventing the strengthening of the position of Hezbollah and the IRGC. Later, after the defeat of some influential groups in the south, the reconciliation process and the evacuation of a number of odious anti-government figures to the north, there was a relative calm in the south of Syria, which did not prevent the IRGC from developing its activities. Today, observers interpret the participation of Zionism in the events in Aleppo by referring to the terrorist Netanyahu’s threats to Assad.
It should be noted that the anti-Iranian rhetoric of many representatives of the Syrian opposition suits the Zionists.
The second nuance was that the ruling Baath party leaders themselves were and remain unhappy with the activities of the IRGC and Hezbollah. The Zionists know this. Secret coordination between some generals of the Syrian army and the Zionists is still being conducted along Moscow lines to this day in order to prevent escalation between the parties and at the same time block Hezbollah’s aspirations to open a third front.
Version two: Assad is a symbol of stability on the borders with Zionism.
This version finds considerable resonance in the Zionist media, since the issue of forming a third front is at stake. At the height of the events in Gaza, Hamas, with the help of the Iranians, carried out mortar attacks on Zionist positions in the occupied Golan, but the Baath no longer allowed the Palestinians to carry out guerrilla attacks, and even rallies in Palestinian camps were banned. Assad clearly did not want and does not want a war with the Zionists, and the Iranians know this, to the point that the new Hezbollah leader did not mention Syria as an active anti-Zionist force along with the Palestinians, Iran, Iraq and Yemen. These points show that there have been strong disagreements within the Axis of Resistance and the ruling structure of Syria is the main stumbling block. From a strategic perspective, the Zionists are not against preserving the Assad government, but they have only one condition, namely the withdrawal of the Iranians from Syria and the cessation of cooperation between Damascus and Hezbollah.
This is what the Zionist media write about the situation after the opposition took Aleppo: “Assad is an enemy, but a familiar enemy with whom we have somehow learned to get along.”
“The scenario of the collapse of the Assad regime could become fertile ground for the growth of significant military threats to Israel”.
The author of the newspaper Yediot Achranot is worried about the future influence of Hamas in Syria and their connection with the Sunni factions of Syrians (referring to the diplomatic channel through Qatar and Turkey). The Zionists fear that instead of Shiite jihadists they will have to fight Sunni revolutionaries. It is also worth noting here the concerns of Zionists about the possible fall of chemical weapons into the hands of the Sunni opposition.
Assad’s silence regarding the occupied Golan Heights also serves as an argument that the preservation of the Baath regime is beneficial to Zionism.
In their discussions on Assad, the Zionists have gone so far as to consider forming an alliance with the Emirates and Saudi Arabia to defend the Baath regime, again with one condition, that Assad must sever all ties with the Iranians.
The Turkish press even claims that during contacts with the UAE, the then President of Syria allegedly requested help from the Zionists.
Version three: Zionism doesn’t care who wins in Syria, because it is everyone’s enemy.
The Foreign Minister of the “Israeli” occupation indicated that they do not support any of the sides, because from the Zionist point of view, there is “no good side” in Syria.
Conclusion.
Based on the current circumstances, we can safely conclude that the fall of Aleppo into the hands of the armed opposition, the crisis in Daraa and even the military coup in Damascus cannot be recorded as a success of Zionist policy; on the contrary, the chaos in Syria has worsened the life of Zionism against the backdrop of a war on two fronts in the Gaza Strip and southern Lebanon. In fact, as in 2012, the Zionists themselves admit that they simply “don’t know what’s going on there.”
Otherwise, even if the Zionists establish contact with some of the jihadists, the moderate opposition, representatives of yesterday’s Baath party, such an alliance will not last long simply because of the local popular pro-Palestinian reaction, the influence of Iran, the existence of numerous supporters of Sunni fundamentalism and “political Islam” throughout Syria. Zionism knows this, and it knows that even some successes in Syria will be only momentary for it, simply because its time is up, it is a stranger in the Islamic world and its end is not far off.
P.S. The fact that Zionism has no reason to rejoice is shown by the fact that the joy over the burning of the Palestinian flag by representatives of Jabhat Nusra was short-lived, against the backdrop of the fortress in Aleppo, where a huge Palestinian flag flutters.
MORE ON THE TOPIC:
syrian rebels showed to russians how to do a special operation. in 3 days aleppo fell, in 3 years kyiv is still standing 🤣
standing in ruins ?
wait how erdogan blow your mind in 4 years, wolf-wannabe homie.
moron turkey, first learn what its nean rojovo. rojovo is turkeys ukraina, and turkey do not do anything about rojovo, minbic still exist. at last russia fighting with ukraina what about turkey? (nothing) rojovo is sitting in its place and turkish army do not move in mimbic.
since 13 years i ask the same question. why assad didnt call out a general mobilisation and clean out all of syria from islamists and the turk and kurd traitors?
lack of manpower, arms, money and support. they did a huge offensive in late 2010s and for the size of greater london, they lost hundreds kia and thousands wounded. idlib is a fortress with tens of thousands of seasoned global jihadis who have made a state. also, idib is tough terrain. very hard to penetrate.
the answer is russia, it is the one which negotiated the ceasefire with turkey in order to protect the terrorists, and if necessary they can be triggered as currently. a sort of pressure move, as proof, israel bombs syria without hesitation and with russian blessing.
we will get the russians and americans out of syria. we will destroy the plan for greater israel in syria (eretz israel). the russians don’t care about syria and the syrians, they just want their access point to africa. we will get you out, slowly if necessary, but you will get out of syria. take care of ukraine. 🇹🇷🐺🤘🏼
greater israhell is coming to…..montana! and hopefully the khazar can be walled in there forever.
despite the khazar bea$t wallowing in blood, much of its own idf diaper-head baby killers, it would appear that the zionazi abomination in occupied palestine has a death wish, which hopefully will soon be fulfilled. the orange man cannot hope to fight and defeat all of the ziorat$’ enemies. israhell is dooooooooooooomed. zzz
i cannot take seriously a writer who cannot write the name “israel” without quotes or referring to them as zionists. even press tv in iran calls them israel. come on, mate. you are not a real analyst. you are an adolescent pretending that the popular kid in school does not exist.
on the contrary, he points directly to the source to the cannibals, the satanic bible. it looks like even russia have forget that those “jews” are from the fatal mistake of weaponizing the khazars. they are more hypnotized than hitler youth. only blind people can not see that today’s “israel” and nazi germany are one and the same. insane white people killing native people.
and they call nazis to the ukranians , just nonsense of idiots wrigting to sheeps
the upper class is fighting against the lower class. assad is not sitting in the trenches. he is not losing any limbs, etc. politicians are not the people’s friends, they are their enemies. every politician in the world belongs to secret organizations that think up these constant conflicts. human history has always been the same. shaped by dictators and their wars. culturally speaking, we still live in the middle ages. with rulers who wage wars with war propaganda, etc.
assad’s leadership under the most difficult circumstances over the past 14 years has saved syria from being overrun and turned into another libya. assad and his family were targeted for murder just like gaddafi and saddam hussein. without him syria would have been overrun by the us/uk/zio proxy headchoppers who have just said they want to recognise israel. syria is the rock on which zionist and neocon intrigues have foundered.
i see “written by damir nazarov” and i know to not waste my time reading a trash article from an erdoganist turd al qaeda lover.
one and three is correct. israel hit many sites between lebanon and syria and also killed the person responcible for cooperation. israel point of view it would be good, if jihasists and hezbollah fought together. but to really degrade hezbollah israel needs to cut the roads between iran and lebanon.
another part is reconciliation. assad torturing tens of thousands of sunni civilians to death and bombing sunni cities to rubble. removing assad would be publicity stunt that might lead saudis and syria recognise israel. assads methods of rule has made him bigger satan in eyes of most sunni arabs than even netanyahu. moreover 80% of syria is sunni arab.
third reason for zionist support is that if syria is cut from iran and iraq, it will be a lot more expensive for iran to sustain syria and hezbollah. if syria is in three parts, it will be even more expensive. if rebels cut highway and take homs, practically government areas will be in three parts.
i love this kind of comedían at sf