DEAR FRIENDS. IF YOU LIKE THIS TYPE OF CONTENT, SUPPORT SOUTHFRONT WORK :
MONERO (XMR): 86yfEHs6pkoDEKCxc6MAnQX8cVHmzhYxMVrNuwKgNmqpWK8dDxjgGnK8PtUNJMACbn6xEGxmRauNTHJhUJpg9Mwz8htBBND
BITCOIN (BTC): bc1qgu58lfszcpqu6fd8l98m378wgzugyg9y93lcym
BITCOIN CASH (BCH): qr28d80s5juzv2793k5jrq59xrl5fxd8qg9h3zlkk2
PAYPAL, WESTERN UNION etc: write to info@southfront.org , southfront90@list.ru
If you face any problems sending funds to the addresses given above, please contact us: info@southfront.org and southfront@list.ru. Also be aware that many email services such as Hotmail, Yahoo etc. may block correspondence from info@southfront.org and some others put it in spam.
If you want to support SouthFront but have no opportunity to do it via cryptocurrency, please contact us: info@southfront.org and southfront@list.ru.
Last night, at least seven Russian regions reported attempted attacks by Ukrainian drones.
One of the targets was the military-civilian airfield in Pskov, which, according to various sources, was targeted by 10 to 21 drones. The Russian air defense failed to intercept all of them. The local Ministry of Emergency Situations confirmed that several aircraft caught fire as a result of the attack. According to media reports, four IL-76 military airlifters were damaged. According to local authorities, casualties were avoided.
The targeted airport is located almost 700 km from the border with Ukraine. While the distance from Pskov to the Latvian border is about 65 kilometers.
The probability of the UAV attack from the territory of the Baltic countries is very high. There is also a version of the work of a pro-Ukrainian group of saboteurs on the territory of Russia, probably aimed to escalate tensions between Moscow and NATO. However, this would be a complicated and risky operation by the Kiev regime.
Anyway, such a provocation could become a step towards a terrible conflict.
Soon after the attack in Pskov, four drones targeted the city of Bryansk. According to the local governor, all of them were shot down. Local sources showed that after a UAV crashed, a fire broke out at the local Kremny EL microelectronics plant.
Two more drones were shot down in the neighboring Oryol region. No damage was reported.
Then two UAVs were intercepted in the Kaluga region. One of them fell into an empty tank for storing petroleum products in the Dzerzhinsky district, as a result, a fire broke out in the area.
The Ministry of Defense announced the shooting down of two more drones in the Ryazan region.
Another UAV was intercepted in the Ruzsky district of the Moscow region.
The governor of Sevastopol claimed that Russian anti-submarine and sabotage defense forces had repelled a drone attack from the sea in the bay in Sevastopol.
In addition, around midnight, one aircraft of the naval aviation of the Black Sea Fleet destroyed four boats with Ukrainian paratroopers with up to 50 servicemen in the Black Sea.
Meanwhile, the air alert was roaring all over Ukraine.
The Russian Aerospace Forces struck targets in Kiev, and according to Ukrainian sources, this was the most massive attack on the city since the last spring. At least six targets were reportedly struck. The mayor of Kiev confirmed fires in the Shevchenko district, including in an administrative building.
Russian strikes also hit targets in Odessa. The infrastructure facility in the Zhytomyr region was damaged. Explosions thundered in Zaporozhye, Krivyi Rih and in the Cherkasy region.
Stuck on the front, the Ukrainian military is trying its best to inflict at least some damage in the Russian rear areas. The last night marked one of the most massive drone attacks on the Russian territory, which indeed resulted in some victories. However, if the involvement of NATO countries in the strikes is confirmed, the small Kiev’s victory may lead to a global catastrophe.
how does a drone target ground based fixed wing aircraft? if it’s done by operators using cameras to spot them then that would be susceptible to jamming. if it’s done by cameras then anything that obscures vision would also counter it, even something as simple as a net canopy, not to mention hangars.
i bet you they were simply parked on the tarmac, which is not uncommon especially since they were most likely active, ie taking off and landing routinely
they park them in makeshift cover out of a berm of dirt. sides and rear are protected by a u shape. it’s good for nothing other than protection from the ground. some of the poorest nations at least have simple hangers. even hardened concrete ones that a drone would merely scratch.
why leave your aircraft exposed insted of putting them on a shelter?
hahahahaha hahahahahaha hahahahahahahah hahahaha hahahahahahaha hahahagahagahahaha hahaha hahahahahah ahahahahaha hahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahah ahahahahahah ahahaha
it all sounds quite nice, but unfortunately you can’t make the calculation without putin, the coward in the kremlin.
nord stream is blown up, putin claims in all seriousness that it was ukros.
the crimean bridge is blown up, putin claims in all seriousness that it was ukros.
the moskva was sunk, putin claims in all seriousness that it was ukros.
airfields are being attacked, putin claims in all seriousness that it was ukros.
dear russians, this is just embarrassing, finally choose a president who has the courage, maybe dmitry anatolyevich medvedev or someone else instead of putin.
the political clique in the west knows putin and shows him off like a stupid circus bear
putin is nothing but a figurehead, the kremlin elites control the situation (to an extent), changing figureheads will do nothing, the war is hopeless now anyway, it’s just positional warfare and the lines have been largely solidified, the way the initial invasion was conducted was so bad that i almost expect that the top brass of the russian military may have been infiltrated by western intelligence agencies
to be successful the invasion force would have had to be much larger, the first objectives should have been to secure the nato borders with ukraine, also instead of multiple spearheads in the northern regions at the start of the war, there should only have been two, one from belarus to secured the polish border and the second, a naval invasion of odessa to stop supplies from romania and link up with forces from transnistria
instead we got an invasion that looked like it was planned by a first grader, or as i suspect, potentially a western intelligence asset that convinced the kremlin elites to go through with a terrible plan that will weaken russia and its government
well ukros have admit it. and us too. in the news. haven’t you watch news?
…the ukros are taking on the responsibility to protect the nato clique. if an atomic bomb explodes in ulan ude tomorrow, the ukros would also take responsibility for it.putin was careful not to have to react.
—can drunk ukros take a ship to the baltic sea at night? -yes —can drunk ukros navigate with a ship at night? -yes —can drunk ukros dive in the baltic sea at night? -yes — do drunken ukros have underwater explosives? -possibly — can drunk ukros dive 70m deep in the baltic sea at night? -possibly — würden die besten taucher der welt nachts in 70m tiefe nordstream finden??? -definitiv nein!!!!
it takes at least one underwater drone to find nordstream and place explosives in several different places to destroy several tubes.
no matter what the ukros claim, they just weren’t!
quite restrained of ukraine not to use heavier ordinance in russian territory. the irony of russia being permitted to have carte blanche in ukeleland and shoigu still manages this mess.
chinese muhang 5 used again? as for crimea targetting
this war is now dry, from now on.
master of the universe would not stop until russia lays down on their knees to their empire… if this happens we are hopeless against them… slava russia!
unless the us and washington itself is hit these strikes will carry on, the us needs a taste of war.
i smell mi6 looking for a reciprocal atrocity as they are bent on turning the city of london into a sea of glass.
what global catastrophy? ah, europe goes to war? would be a short one. the us. would be the final end of the latter.