Illustrative Image
CNN admits that even US officials are skeptical in this regard, noting that “Russia also has extensive anti-aircraft systems that could easily shoot down the F-16s”, adding that “Ukraine has not been conducting many air missions with the fighter planes it already has for precisely that reason”.
Written by Drago Bosnic, independent geopolitical and military analyst
The troubled Biden administration “finally gave in to pressure” and decided to greenlight the delivery of F-16s to the Kiev regime. In an effort apparently spearheaded by the UK and the Netherlands, NATO’s European members will now have the legal basis to deliver their old F-16s to the Neo-Nazi junta. The almost endemically Russophobic London doesn’t even operate F-16s and yet it stands at the forefront of this extremely escalatory initiative. The White House has been mulling this for months, while Ukrainian pilots have been training in several NATO countries, the United States included. This is a clear indicator that the supply of these (First) Cold War-era fighter jets was planned for quite some time.
A bit more than half a dozen European nations operate F-16s, of which at least three are actively replacing them with the troubled F-35s. Some, such as Norway, officially retired all of their F-16s and replaced them with F-35s, so Oslo might be the first “unexpected” candidate to send its decommissioned fighters to the Kiev regime. The Netherlands, Belgium and Denmark still operate the jet and could also send theirs. On the other hand, members such as Poland and Romania are extremely unlikely to do so, as the move would undermine their own security. The same (or even more so) goes for Turkey and Greece, which both operate F-16s extensively, but are locked in a long-time rivalry that makes either unwilling to weaken themselves for Kiev’s sake.
The US is by far the largest operator of F-16s, but it still hasn’t announced plans to deliver them to its favorite puppet regime. The belligerent thalassocracy’s propaganda machine insists that Washington DC is supposedly “reluctant to do so to avoid escalation with Moscow”. However, this is a moot point, as the US has so far done everything in its power to antagonize Russia through a series of moves that have pushed the world dangerously close to a world-ending thermonuclear conflict. Still, this doesn’t seem to stop Washington DC from going ahead with such plans, at the very least covertly. National Security Council coordinator John Kirby recently admitted this, stating that “the US has been forward-looking about future capabilities and needs”.
Kirby later added that “F-16s were not on the agenda at the G7”, but hinted that “the fighter jet would certainly come up on the sidelines of the summit”. According to CNN, this issue is expected to be one of the main topics of the upcoming NATO summit in Lithuania’s Vilnius in July. To avoid directly implicating the belligerent alliance, some have even suggested that the training of Ukrainian pilots could be relegated to the F-16 manufacturer, Lockheed Martin. Still, several high-ranking US officials insist that the process would require a great deal of the Pentagon’s participation, particularly in terms of providing weapons for the jet. In essence, there is simply no way for the US to provide F-16s without getting involved directly, a move that Russia won’t forget or leave unanswered.
According to CNN, back in March, the US hosted two Ukrainian pilots at a military base in Tucson, Arizona, where USAF has been evaluating their skills to assess how much time they would need to learn to fly various American military aircraft, including the F-16. However, the infamous neoliberal mouthpiece, citing yet another unnamed senior US official, insists that “the US has no plans as of now to expand that training”. But, according to their own admission, Congress has already set aside funds in the 2023 budget precisely for such training. Once again, this is a clear indicator that Washington DC is only pretending to care about “avoiding escalation with Moscow”. Still, this leaves the obvious question of how effective the F-16 would be against clearly superior Russian jets, such as the Su-35S or MiG-31BM, to say nothing of the Su-57.
CNN admits that even US officials are skeptical in this regard, noting that “Russia also has extensive anti-aircraft systems that could easily shoot down the F-16s”, adding that “Ukraine has not been conducting many air missions with the fighter planes it already has for precisely that reason”. Indeed, while the mainstream propaganda machine will surely present F-16s as yet another “wunderwaffen”, the jet is a light single-engine platform dating back to the late 1960s/early 1970s. Since the end of the (First) Cold War, Russia has been operating exclusively heavier classes of fighter jets, including several variants and iterations of its legendary Su-27, in addition to other top-of-the-line fighter jets, such as the superfast, high-flying MiG-31BM. The F-16’s chances of survival against such opponents are minimal.
In the virtually guaranteed case that any Russian jet shoots down an F-16, this could easily destroy its reputation, which the American war propaganda has been building for decades, primarily based on its usage against largely helpless opponents during countless US aggressions and invasions. This could also translate to major financial losses for the manufacturer, as was the case for Raytheon, whose stocks plummeted after its much-touted “Patriot” was destroyed in a recent Russian airstrike. Such a loss could also affect the sales of newer variants of the F-16, particularly the Block 70/72 model which has been earmarked for delivery to China’s breakaway island province of Taiwan. In addition, as already mentioned by the “unnamed US officials”, Russia’s second-to-none air defenses would make short work of even much heavier and more advanced targets, let alone an F-16.
like these old f-16s will make a difference for the ukranazis, lmao. 😆🤣😆
the new picture, very different from the start of the war, is that russians acquired almost a pleasure when hearing about new metal junk deliveries from west shithole, because only now they are safe on theirs military-industrial complex. from the first of january 2024 to may, over 117.000 volunteers entered the ranks of the russian forces (not wagner)
the man himself 😘😘
https://twitter .com/i/status/1661144879450161158
the f-16s will absolutely bring back the millions of refugees who have bailed out of the burning pile of dogshit that is the failed ukrainian cia project. the f-16s will likewise resurrect the 150k+ dead ukrainian military personnel killed since the us coup in 2014. and the f-16s will finally allow the ato to retake donbas after more than nine years. crimea, too. i predict all of the above by the end of june.
just like the other megatrash wunderweapon sent from atlantic shit to be discarded as soon as they encounter the red army….let them coming, lad’s ! pma is in a point where is a high pleasure to hear about new west deliveries. keep sending them, rambo is awaiting, idiots !
the man himself 😘
https://twitter .com/i/status/1661144879450161158
great opportunity for “sharpening” the targeting of those advanced sa systems, both sa-400s and prototypes.
bagati tinichele… avem destule la borcea…
thesef-16’s, if they are sent, will have to be piloted by well compensated nato pilots. what will be their targets? whatever that might be it certainly will be only to provoke russia into a reaction that the western criminal elite desire.
ha, ha, ha … f16 ak dodajú na ukrajinu tak to bude ďalšia veľká rana pre darebácky štát usa ak sa ukážu že stoja za veľké hovno. a to sa ukáže. ruskí vojaci sa už nevedia dočkať, ako si budú môcť konečne zapoľovať na f16!!! pohoreli himars, pohoreli patriot a pohoria aj f16!!!
the f-16 is very ill-suited to ukraine even in the event they are properly trained, which they won’t be. they are delicate and have one engine on them that can be affected even by dirt. they can’t take off and land in dirty fields and half-destroyed airfields. most of them might be unable to fly and those that do fly will just be in the air for minutes before being detected and brought down. successful strikes will come with the total loss of the plane
nothing prolongs ukrainian suffering as much as zelensky!
so which version of the f16 is being provided? anything below block 50 will be pretty useless. block 50 and above are good aircraft with decent avionics however how many will be provided and more importantly where are they going to operate out of?
soviet aircraft were built to take off from improvised runways, fields etc. this is why ukraine has been able to continue flying its migs and sukhois despite having all their airfields bombed.
precisely and thats exactly what the f16 are for: to prolong the suffering the ukrainian people until kremlin cant take it any more and unconditionally give up…………………………lol.
the kreml never gives up. ask napo or hitler
we know. why the purpose is only to leave russia as a smashed and hurt, muddy country like they were after wwii………………………..lol.
if ukraine was smart, they’d buy their weapons from the russians.
training for that plane is minimum 1 year !!! perhaps they will just train to take off and fly to the target, if they get there, drop a bomb and never come back. rusia has to take an eye on the black sea, the only way they can come. if they cross the border from poland , romenia, then thos countrys become legitim target. for maintenance the crew must come to oukraine and be killed. be careful, i think the yankees are gon a use a biowapen like covid to neutralise russia.
i have read some articles about f-16, and still don’t understand , how they can help to “save” ukraine. it’s like a wholesaler gets rid of a junk by spending it to some nonprofit organisation. or like a sabotage action against ukraine to make sure they will loose. makes no sense.