0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
2,180 $
8 DAYS LEFT UNTIL THE END OF NOVEMBER

Foreign Policy Tripe: Scott Morrison’s “Arc of Autocracy”

Support SouthFront

Foreign Policy Tripe: Scott Morrison’s “Arc of Autocracy”

Illustrative Image

Written by Dr. Binoy Kampmark

Grand foreign policy speeches are not usually the specialty of Australian Prime Ministers.  Little insight can be gleaned from them.  A more profitable exercise would be consulting the US State Department’s briefings, which give more accurate barometric readings of policy in Canberra.  The same goes for the selected adversary of the day.  Washington’s adversaries must be those of Canberra’s.  To challenge such assumptions would be heretical.  To act upon them would be apostasy.

The speech by Prime Minister Scott Morrison on March 7 to the Lowy Institute lived down to expectations.  Where it did serve some value was to highlight a mirror portrait of the man himself, describing an amoral world of power he inhabits.  “We face,” he solemnly stated, “the spectre of a transactional world, devoid of principle, accountability and transparency, where state sovereignty, territorial integrity and liberty are surrendered for respite from coercion and intimidation, or economic entrapment dressed up as economic reward.”

In other respects, this speech was derivative of previous efforts to simplify the world into camps of wearying darkness and sublime light.  In his 2002 State of the Union Address, US President George W. Bush did precisely that.  Before losing our intellectual integrity in examining Morrison’s efforts of profound shallowness, let us go back to that original, dunce-crafted address, amply aided by David Frum, the Iraq War’s polished and persistent apologist.

When Bush delivered his address, the moment was certainly strained.  The September 11, 2001 attacks still searingly fresh; the administration trying to come up with a doctrine to cope with the scourge of international Islamist terrorism.  In such instances, a subtle analysis of the global scene, a mapping of sensible policy, might have been too much to ask.

What the world got was an adolescent morality sketch based on angry pre-emption in a rotten world.  The US, Bush promised, would pursue “two great objectives.”  The first involved shutting down terrorist camps, disrupting the plans of terrorists, and bringing “terrorists to justice.”  The second: “to prevent the terrorists and regimes who seek chemical, biological or nuclear weapons from threatening the United States and the world.”

With the objectives stated, the heavy padding was introduced into the speech.  North Korea, Iran and Iraq were singled out for special mention.  “States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger.”  The sequence of catastrophic, and bloody blunders that would culminate in the destruction of the ancient lands of Mesopotamia, was being floated.  Evidence would be secondary to assumption and ideology.

Morrison’s own assessment is not much better.  “A new arc of autocracy is instinctively aligning itself to challenge and reset the world order in their own image.” At best, this silly formulation is dated, one straight out of musty history books depicting Beijing and Moscow as joined at the hip, keen on world revolution.

Russia’s assault on Ukraine is taken to be an attack on the “rules-based international order, built upon the principles and values that guide our own nation”.  This order “supported peace and stability, and allowed sovereign nations to pursue their interests free from coercion.”

This same order was grossly, and willingly violated by the US-led coalition that marched into a sovereign state in 2003, unleashing tides of sectarianism that continue in their fury.  The grounds for attacking Iraq were specious, and there was no interest in allowing it to pursue its “interests free from coercion.”  Instead, a sanguinary, ramshackle protectorate was created, crudely supervised by international forces that aided in driving jihadi tourism.

The same order Morrison blithely describes was violated by NATO in its bombing of vital civilian infrastructure in Serbia in 1999, ostensibly to halt a genocide of Kosovars.  In 2011, the same rules-based-order became something of a joke with the aerial intervention by French, UK and US forces in backing a revolt against Colonel Muammar Gaddafi in Libya.  Unceremoniously butchered by an ecstatic mob, Gaddafi did not live to see his country virtually partitioned by rival militias.

The adversaries of the US are on very solid ground to point these misdeeds out, and Russian President Vladimir Putin does not shy away from reminding the West of this fact in his February 24 speech.  Western colleagues, Putin remarked, “do not like to remember those events, and when we talk about it, they prefer to point not to the norms of international law, but to the circumstances that they interpret as they see fit.”  This hardly adds weight to his own self-interpreted claims, but they serve to draw a thick line under hypocrisy masquerading as virtue.

Morrison hits a sinister register in describing the effects of the principle-free, transactional world.  “The well-motivated altruistic ambition of our international institutions has opened the door to this threat.  Just as our open markets and liberal democracies have enabled hostile influence and interference to penetrate not our own societies and economies.”  What is he suggesting?  A violent retaliation, a forced reversal?

Much impatience was expressed with how these naughty regimes of the autocratic arc have managed to get away with it.  It might be “right to aspire” to “inclusion and accommodation”, but Australia and its allies had been left “disappointed”.  But not his government – not the Liberal-Nationals, who had been “clear eyed”, having “taken strong, brave and world-leading action in response.”

To show how clear of eye Morrison has been, he has successfully made Australia the subservient partner in the AUKUS security pact with the United States and the UK.  What was left of Australian sovereignty has been brazenly outsourced.  The prime minister barely acknowledges the rationale of the agreement in the Lowy address, which has little to do with Australia eventually having its own questionable submarines with nuclear propulsion.  The central point is granting greater access to US armed forces for easier deployment in the Indo-Pacific, a logistical benefit that is bound to make any war more, rather than less likely.  Some freedom; some sovereignty.

Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge.  He currently lectures at RMIT University.  Email: bkampmark@gmail.com

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Karl Wolfe

Australia: the Bastion of Totalitarianism in the world. These Freemason controlled pedo monsters do EXACTLY as they are told to take away our Human Rights worldwide. Read “1984” or The Original Sherlock Holmes Stories to help sharpen your mind to see through the lies and propaganda. Kiev is indeed controlled by extremist groups who are closely allied with the Mafia that traffics kids through Ukraine. Putin is a modern day Peter the Great against a world of satanic murderers. They hate him for standing on Principles instead of just going along with the Plan to turn earth into a communist totalitarian state.

hash
failed
Derka964

Qanon fruit?

Karl Wolfe

Qanon is a psychological operation against the American people. Only a fool would believe in it. I read the overseas news and history books and articles. Because you are ignorant and don’t read you are easy to deceive by the television programmers. They work for the people who are Invested in the gas pipelines in Ukraine. Better start reading a little bit. I recommend George Orwells book “1984”, his deliberate WARNING to humanity about the plans by the “elites” against humanity. Then I would read The Original Sherlock Holmes Stories to open your mind to Observation and the skills of learning how to identify Truth versus lies. Then consider the words of Jesus of Nazareth that the world is run by “powers and principalities”. Or perhaps he was a conspiracy theorist as well ?

Elohim Kosher Bar

I wonder how much blackmail the Globalists have on Morrison? Did he visit Epstein’s fantasy pedo island?

hash
failed
BabylonGarden

Morrison is a under performing failure. A classic underwhelming Party hack. Prone to lying to the public and then claiming the right to change his position. Polls show long term tanking of his popular approval, and declining approval from within his own Party. He will not survive the next election cycle.

hash
hashed
Last edited 2 years ago by BabylonGarden
Tommy Jensen

Exactly what I have pointed out the last 20 years: The invasion of Ukraine is an attack on “the International rules-based usury order” and our planet. This “usury order“ supported peace and stability, and allowed sovereign nations to appoint gays as PM’s sniffing coke when they wanted it, and pursue Western usury loans in their own interests free from coercion and any interference from people and nations who wanted to play Robin Hood’s. Today an axis of evilness and aggression have gathered, an axis who are hoarding gold, develop hypersonic weapons, pay out their loans, and refuse to participate in the dollar circus, pursuing their own happiness without any empathy for innocent British bankers, threatening our financial business and our way of living.

Last edited 2 years ago by Tommy Jensen
goingbrokes

Morrison’s speech at the Lowy911 Institute needs to be read like a coded document. Like this: “We (the elites) face the spectre of transactional world with principles, accountability and transparency (that we have been able to subvert and avoid up to now) where states are sovereign (unlike Australia) have territorial integrity (no external governance) and have true liberty, and they will not surrender these for coercion, or intimidation, or economic debt entrapment dressed up as economic reward (like they have done until recently)!” Russia’s attack on Ukraine is an attack on “the rules-based international order of the elites, built upon the elite principles and values (of inequality, racism, slavery and world-socialism that we have used to) guide our nation. This order supported peace (by exporting war) and stability (of elite incomes), and allowed no sovereignty to nations to pursue their interests free from coercion.” “The ill-motivated un-altruistic ambitions of our international elite institutions has mistakenly opened the door to this threat. Just as our controlled, but not controlled enough, markets and illiberal, but still far too liberal, pseudo-democractic puppet shows have enabled hostile influence and interference to penetrate our own(ed) slave societies and controlled economies.” There, fixed it!

Tom Bombastadillo

Scott Morrison is tripe personified.

hash
hashed
.....

Scott the Idiot

hash
hashed
Last edited 2 years ago by .....
yep

true

Last edited 2 years ago by yep
10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x