In Video: Fierce Clashes Between Popular Mobilization Units And ISIS Erupt Near Mosul

Thats no big question. The Coalision was called back to regain the fictive Iraqian army and do well, but thats not able to cover Iraq.

Instead the cover is by several milisia of different shiit origin, which also is a probpems, because some of them are very hostile to us as even as helpers and asked in as well as the Sunnis there.

So a map says the cover for fighting ISIS is a puzzle, where the different armed units also is moved around, so they dont attack each other.

The Coalision imainly are not fighting troops anymore. We as danes mainly educate the Turkish forces and its well organized. Next year we will withdraw abuout 185, which also take well care of a local relative big radar. That groups alos has worked hard for better logostics between troops and different kinds of troops as well as better contact to the Iraqian airforce.

The replacements will be about 230 also not being ative fighters. Its very complicated to start an army from nothing and make it to a relative good one against ISIS. A very important part of our has beem shooring practice wastling less bullets even You hit more enemies. Another has been small units having 10 soldiers has to operate as a well organised unit with the low ranked officers and dont need commanders from above to act well being much more themselves using suddenly seen possiblities(the fine name for that id oportunisme).

Arabs in the region are very very bad being not raised for that in religion and culture. We see the same for fx Assads. Too much “biig” always win´s. Thats often not true, if You meet ISIS and SDFs in the best having smaller very mobile units under small commands in 10 or 20 seize. Those are like bees and even small, they hit You again and again with their light weapons and being well educated for making traps and camouflage.

But the Iraqian part “the Bagdad regular army” actually has been able to learn that change and dont run away anymore. They fight back.

The PMUs fight much different then that. They aree much more in the old days, but they do that version of being good soldiers well. Some parts a,so are well almred for it by Iran. The main pronblems are, they see almost all sunnis as enemies and dont get those are hostile because of Iran and the mismanegmentby Bagdad.

I hope You undertsnad some of it. We teach and implements as well as we work for the Iraqians of Bagdad can take over more and more.

My private oppinion about it is very clear: Syria as well as Iraq should be divided into new structures. Bagdads as well as those from Damaskus has no strctures to devellop those artificial countries, but should be into smaller affiliated ones shaing all oil incomes in % pr inhabitant.

Military control even by several very different proxies makes military and too often devastaing control. It makes nothing else and unfortunatly also is very infected by acceptance for corruption by the wrong leaders, where even the Iraqian last election showed it well.

The population has to be changed from being passive or active having the only other alternative burning the streets and being shot at for bad reasons too. Thats no country. A country includes people and not byu tribe language etnicity religion aso.

Those were made by Assads. Those WERE heavy supported by USA and us for a short while only.

So stop Your infected outdated old crap.