A Russian interceptor drone rammed a Ukrainian aerostat carrying a Starlink-equipped drone at an altitude of more than 10,000 meters, Russia’s Defense Ministry announced on October 6.
According to the ministry, an operator from the 50th Separate Varyag Brigade of the Russian Unmanned Systems Forces struck the balloon in midair, forcing it into a rough landing. The ministry also released video footwing showing the interception.
The footage had circulated on Russian military channels a day earlier. Independent observers identified the target as an aerostat carrying a first-person view (FPV) suicide quadcopter beneath it. The exact location of the interception remains unknown.
Ukraine has been using small aerostats as airborne carriers that move drones along the first leg of the journey without draining the drones’ own batteries. Aerostats can follow favorable winds and release their payloads closer to Russian rear-area targets, extending the drones’ effective reach.
A Starlink terminal lets the carried drone keep a satellite connection after release, allowing it to reach areas that would otherwise lie beyond the range of an FPV suicide quadcopter’s control link.
The tactic has been reported in recent months as part of Ukrainian efforts to strike Russian logistics routes farther from the front. At altitudes of several kilometers, the aerostat itself is difficult to engage with conventional small-drone defenses, so detecting and intercepting it is a separate air defense challenge.
The incident suggests Moscow is now developing ways to target the carrier before the drone can be released. The Russian Defense Ministry has not said how the balloon was detected or whether the interceptor was designed specifically for this mission.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SouthFront: Analysis and Intelligence
NOW hosted at southfront.press
Previously, SouthFront: Analysis and Intelligence was at southfront.org.
The .org domain name had been blocked by the US (NATO) (https://southfront.press/southfront-org-blocked-by-u-s-controlled-global-internet-supervisor/) globally, outlawed and without any explanation
Back before that, from 2013 to 2015, SouthFront: Analysis and Intelligence was at southfront.com
MORE ON THIS TOPIC:



people of the polygon 404 should do the right thing and overthrown their narco dictator. zel should go to hell, the jewish wannabe neo nazi, take him down
but what would change? just learn history of ukrainity (it’s not so long), it’s like janissary army in osmanian empire. turks forced conquered people from balkans to give own kids as tax. boys learned combat tactics an islamic philosophy. that’s how turks created janissary corps — regular army of the empire. later muslim families got access to janissary schools too, because janissary’s social status was high. they managed some coups later and disbanded for that.
ukros are brainwashed like janissary. nazi korchinskiy said clear: ukrainian is that who fight russia. core of the problem is not the clown, but ukrainization policy and its sponsors. poles invented ukrainity in the beginning of 19 century. austrians used it for ethnic cleansing in galitzia (lvov rregion) against rusins (local name of ethnic russians) and poles in ww1. later germans used them. since 1945 — epsteinites, the us and england mostly. canada gave them shelter. who rules canada?
probably how the sudden disease outbreak happened in russia recently too. read up on unit 731.
there are also natural sources of deceases, no connection with unit 731 monsters, because it’s far from region where they committed their crimes. a woman, one of scientific group, researched a probe from this source, broke a test tube, but didn’t said. found curious comment on “yahoo” at this matter: “one person died in russia and trump offering help, meanwhile at home we’ve had 3800 measles cases with 5 deaths and its business as usual!”
my americunt anuz intercepts many joo peniz
we’re close to 1 million destroyed orcs…heheheh
so musk is one of the nazism’s sponsors, right or wrong?