The Russian military has struck a Soviet-made Su-25 close air support fighter jet of the Ukrainian Air Force (UAF) using a Lancet loitering munition.
The Su-25 was on the ground in the Dolgintsevo Air Base in Kryvyi Rih region, more than 60 kilometers away from the front in the special military operation zone, when it was struck by a Lancet. The loitering munition hit the nose and cabin of the jet, possibly placing it out of service permanently.
The UAF had around 60 Su-25UB, Su-25K and Su-25M1 when the Russian special military operation began in 2022. Ukraine later received additional jets of this type, reportedly more than 14, from Belgharia and North Macedonia. Still, most Ukrainian Su-25 have been already destroyed on the ground or shot down by the Russian military.
The Lancet, which was used to target the Ukrainian Su-25, was developed by the ZALA Aero Group, a subsidiary of Russia’s defense giant Kalashnikov Concern.
The company produces two versions of the loitering munition, the Izdeliye-52 with an endurance of 30 minutes and a one-kilogram warhead and the larger Izdeliye-51 that has an endurance of 40 minutes and is armed with a warhead weighting three kilograms.
The loitering munition flies towards the designated area with a GLONASS-aided inertial navigation system. After arriving in the area, the operator utilizes an onboard electro-optical system via a two-way data-link to detect, track and lock on the target. A laser-ranging system then controls the detonation of the warhead.
The small radar cross-section and minimal infrared signature of the electric-powered loitering munition makes it very difficult to detect and intercept.
Ukrainian attempts to stop Lancet loitering munitions with air defense fire, electronic warfare or countermeasures have been mostly unsuccessful.
According to Lostarmour.info, a website that tracks and documents military losses, the Russian military has so far used the Lancet to destroy or damage four warplanes of the UAF on the ground. The number includes only strikes verified by video.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SouthFront: Analysis and Intelligence
NOW hosted at southfront.press
Previously, SouthFront: Analysis and Intelligence was at southfront.org.
The .org domain name had been blocked by the US (NATO) (https://southfront.press/southfront-org-blocked-by-u-s-controlled-global-internet-supervisor/) globally, outlawed and without any explanation
Back before that, from 2013 to 2015, SouthFront: Analysis and Intelligence was at southfront.com
ha! missed.
hard to say when the video is made up out of 6 pixels
i have seen this before: smart guys these pilots who leave the jets outside in the open. they are not volunteering for kamikaze missions lmao
why hasn’t that exceptional, indispensable nation developed glonass jamming yet? too busy trying to make f-35s fly, i guess. put more boeing engineers on the problem.
are you serious??? you call that a hit??? ha ha ha ha ha ha… you guys are embarrassing me!
so your assumption and perception of watching this video is proof it didn’t hit? okay expert
when they run out of ukrainians, its time to throw the polish into the kransky. then western trannies and soy boys will be next
that shot missed the target
looks like repairable damage at most
a unusual strong shaking up and down of the lancet, instead the usual smooth and accurate flight directon, maybe some electronic warfare measures? a nearby miss, but due to shrapnel maybe enough to damage the radar in the nose and the cockpit front to take it out of service for a longer time. use next time a fab500 or bigger, than it will be enoug to hit i even 20m away for full destruction.