On August 28, the Russian Defense Ministry released a new group of videos showing strikes on militnats’ positions and equipment in Syria’s Greater Idlib region. According to the military, the strikes targeted positions near the settlements of Et Tah, Sukayat, Tarmala, Kursa and Maaret Tera.
0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
8 DAYS LEFT UNTIL THE END OF NOVEMBER
the 3rd vid missed the target by alot.
Drone
that dosent change the fact it was a clear miss.
Death from above
and would they release a video that clear show they missed the target?
ofc just like they did with that video game footage. mistakes happen.
He didn’t think of that, he just trolls what they tell him.
An unarmed surveillance drone. Stupid murican
1. Yes its a drone 2.I am not “Murican” 3.It dose not change the fact it was a miss.
1. Yes 2. If you say so 3. If you say so Stupid troll murican
Are you a cretin? Since you really seem like one. You do not argue with any of my points and just copy my respons with your nonesense.
You mean the fourth video.. yeah it literally struck the other building next to the one the drone was designating.
Drone doesn’t designate anything in this situation. We can not know which building was assigned as target for the pilot.
it was a clear miss it did not even hit the building it hit the street right next to the small building.
Because you know nothing about targeting and military doctrine. It hit the street, because under that street there was a tunnel that was conecting those two, also destroyed buildings. FAB 250 is formidable bomb. I wish they’ve showed the aftermath after smoke is gone, if something isn’t burning, from different sides, so you can see that these targets are neutralized.
their is one problem with your statment the FAB-250 is a general pourpous bomb and a flat nose one at that its not ment to penetrate earth/concorete/rock,even with a delayed action fuse it cant do that since its shaped like a cilinder with a flat nose. Also on top of that how can a small 250kg bomb destroy a building without hitting it? You need a minimum of a 500kg to do that.
A 75 to 100mm shell, will leave a crater, and its shrapnel and pressure blast would easily wipe out troops on either side of the street.
That’s about 20kg in a large shell, so 250kg coming down will obliterate any people within the blast radius, while sending a shockwave which could collapse an underground passageway close to the surface.
“A 75 to 100mm shell, will leave a crater, and its shrapnel and pressure blast would easily wipe out troops on either side of the street.”
But we dont see anyone on ether side of the street now do we?
“That’s about 20kg in a large shell, so 250kg coming down will obliterate any people within the blast radius, while sending a shockwave which could collapse an underground passageway close to the surface.”
A 20kg 75mm shell?!?! Are you insane? That dose not exist…even 100mm shells weight a max of 15kg. Also you seem to be missing the point about explosives content as well…a standard M107 155mm shell only has about 6.5kg of TNT or RDX mix in it,smaller shells have even less. Also you really seem to over estemate what a 250kg bomb can do it cant collapse a tunnle since earth and rock are very good at absorbing shokwaves same with the street if you are hideing in a building you will be fine you will hide form both the shock and shrapnel. Also just for you info a 250kg bomb has form 50 to 87kg of explosive filler…not 250…
You should see what proper soldiers do with a few pounds of explosives, but the Poles just surrender en masse.
Are you mentally challenged or something? You are clearly wrong and now try to deflect the conversation…Also what dose Poland have to do with this? Are you ok? Did you take your meds?
You go duck yourself you nazip rick.
You are clearly a nazi troll, so do one.
…..wtf is wrong with you? I am now a nazi? wat?
I assumed you were a nazi all along, but you say it happened just now!
lol
Ok i am starting to actually think their is something wrong in your head.
Thanks for your concern Martin, how thoughtful.
Even a near miss can cause casualties due to shrapnel and compression. Do you hear what I am saying, or are your ear drums broken?
thats irelevant if it did not hit the intended building even a 250kg bomb can only do so mutch to a structure with its blast and shrapnel. I am not even hating this is a real critisizam but i can say i am not impressed with the accuracy of most of the Russian strikes they almost exclusevly use unguided FAB-250/270 and FAB-500 bombs.
And yet the Russians stopped the transportation of Syrian oil by ISIS with airstrikes.
The US had been “patrolling” the area for the previous 2 years, and didn’t hit one oil-tanker.
And what exactly is the relevancy of that to the 4th video in witch they clearly missed the target?
I give up, tell me youp rick.
You do not seem very bright,i fail to see what the 4th vids miss has to do with anything you just said.
You looking for a light, or what youp rick.
No i am looking for intelligent life but i seem to have come to the wrong place.
Try somewhere other than where you live, not a hope of any intelligence being found there.
Did you give the pilot the targeting data?
Out of all the bombs Russia has dropped on ISIS, you think they put in a shot of a miss they had?
Are you slow, or just an MSM troll?
No but its a obvious miss. Also yes you wold cosidering they claimed that videogame footage was proof that the US supported ISIS.
Obvious? Why, have you the targeting data?
The US fund, arm and transport ISIS, or did you think ISIS moves on commercial airlines.
Yes its extremely obvious it did not hit anything it hit the durt street next to the small house. Also again i fail to see what relevance has the supposed US support for ISIS with a vid of a Russian strike missing.
What is “supposed” about it?
ISIS doesn’t have its own airline service!
like i said what relevance dose that have to the miss?
Dose, is what you need, as well as English lessons. lol
My english is fine you can understand it clearly otherwise you wont be this butthurt about how a bomb clearly missed its target.
English actually, you ducking nazip rick.
No bomb missed its target, that’s just the cast in your guzz eye. lol
I think you really are mentally challenged XD getting so butthurt over an obvious miss and that i did not put a capital on english XDDDD take you pils man XD
Who cares what ap rick like you says?
then why are you replying?
You don’t do English at all, you muppet.
I just wanted to call you ap rick, as you are.
wtf is a “rick”? you know for a guy whom claims he knows english you shure do make up alot of words xD
lol.
You can’t see it, youp rick. ap rick, thep rick, ducking hilarious.
I give up you really are retarded
You should, as you’re duck all good at English comp!
It is actually more efficient in order to maximize number of casualties to detonate a normal non armor piercing bomb next to a multi storeyed building rather than having it hit the roof.
ummm no general poupous bombs need a direct hit on a uncompromised building in order to destroy it.
A 250 kg non penetrating bomb might have troubles collapsing a 3 storey hardened concrete buildings as just the upper 1 or 2 levels would suffer from any serious damage.
ofc
He never heard of blast damage, pressure waves, internal organs being burst from such effects, nothing at all that makes perfect sense to non trolls.
pardon my mistake yes the 4th
Are you sure, everyone else could count the videos!
I made a mistake in witch vid it was and corrected it,i dont see why you are beeing so butthurt about it.
You make a lot of mistakes, which explains why you are a rightp rick.
what other mistake did i make? Point it out instead of babeling like a cretin.
Spell it out, you mean.
Another one, you can’t help it ffs. lol
No i mean point it out you imbecil. FFS if english is your first language i feel sorry for you…
Those targets are neutralized. And those positions are already overrun by the SAA…
I know that but what dose that have to do with the current argument?
It does, that those targets have been eliminated, otherwise they wouldn’t be able to attack and overrun them.
Thats not the point. My original point was that the bomb missed its target by alot and this is a trend in Russian airstrikes while i am awar they exclusevly use unguided munitions for cost effectivness and i do admit that for unguided munitions they are very accurate.
Both three targets were eliminated, and that is the main thing.
IF?
Aren’t you a proper plonker, posting in a language you are to thick to understand. You must be another Polish Slav who thinks he’s Western, you potato muncher.
Even near misses do enough damage to either destroy or disable, I don’t think it’s going anywhere very soon. In the first vid the vehicle totally disappears, it’s like a clever magicians trick, now you see it and now you don’t, LOL.
ofc but the aircraft is clearly targeting a building and not the street next to it.
These look like one, two, or three weeks old videos, am I wrong ?
I think you are. I’ve never seen these before.
good “sabotage” :) altayran guy!
In the first vid the vehicle was totally obliterated, wow, that must have been a really big warhead.