Click to see the full-size image
Written by Uriel Araujo, researcher with a focus on international and ethnic conflicts
This has been a busy weekend in the Levant and in the Red Sea, as well. For one thing, according to the US Central Command (CENTCOM), on January 20, at about 6:30 p.m. (Baghdad time), several rockets and ballistic missiles were launched by “Iranian-backed militants in Western Iraq” targeting the al-Assad Airbase, which hosts American troops. Most of the missiles were intercepted but some evaded the defense system and the base suffered some damage.
Some American personnel were injured also. The next day, however, Brigadier General Yahya Rasool, spokesman for Iraq’s Joint Operations Command, referring to the presence of the US military, stated that his country’s government is “ resolute to put an end to the deployment of foreign forces in the country. It has devised a vision plan for the next stage, which includes joint technical activities intended for the US-led coalition’s departure and subsequent security and military cooperation.”
On January 18, during the World Economic Forum in Davos, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ al-Sudani had already reiterated the call for the troops to leave: “the end of the US-led coalition mission is a necessity for the security and stability of Iraq. It is also a necessity for preserving constructive bilateral relations between Iraq and the coalition countries.”
Since then US President Donald Trump ordered the assassination (by drone strike near Baghdad International Airport) of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in 2020, many voices in Iraq have been calling for the withdrawal of foreign troops. The assassination was praised by both Israel and the ISIS terrorist group. Soleimani and Iraqi militia commander Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, who was also killed during the strike, were both leading figures in the struggle against ISIS in the Levant. Iraq’s Prime Minister Sudani has repeatedly demanded the Americans leave Iraq, with his country adopting a law to expel foreign troops.
After the al-Assad Airbase attack last weekend, however, the US is trying to exploit the episode to justify their presence in the country. The country’s Prime Minister not being very inclined to agree with such line of reasoning, so the US Ambassador to Iraq Alina Romanowski met with Former Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on January 21, the next day after the attack. Although al-Maliki stressed “the importance of strengthening the ties of friendship and cooperation” between Washington and Baghdah during the meeting, he remains a top leader of what can be described as a pro-Iranian bloc in his country. Iran’s influence in Iraq has grown tremendously in the last years, and Tehran could in fact be described as the main winner of the Iraq’s war, after the failure of Washington’s neo-colonial project.
The episode on al-Assad Airbase is just the latest in a series of attacks on American positions in the Levant (in both Syria and Iraq) since October 2023, when the Israeli-Palestine conflict escalated. These attacks are being launched by Iran-backed groups in the region. It is not the only thing pertaining to Iran that troubles the US and the West though, one needs only take a look at the Red Sea, for instance
On January 21, the US Centcom stated that two Navy Seals (American elite special operations personnel) have been declared dead after a 10-day Search. They disappeared during an operation off the coast of Somalia to seize Iranian weaponry destined for Houthi forces in Yemen.
For years, Israel has carried out strikes targeting Iranian personnel and their allies in Syria, where Iran has a military presence. This has intensified since Israel’s widely condemned military campaign in Gaza started. As I wrote, that turn of events in Palestine has also triggered an escalation of the long-going Iranian-Israeli covert war – this “secret war” is increasingly turning into an overt one, as we can see in the Red Sea and beyond.
On January 20, an attack in Syria in the Mazzeh neighborhood (south-west Damascus) killed the Iranian Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) intelligence chief and his deputy, plus other IRGC members, and a number of Syrian forces. Iranian president Ebrahim Raisi said Israel was responsible for the strike, which he described as “terrorist and criminal”, adding that it “will not remain unanswered.” Raisi urged international actors to condemn the attack, which took place in an area that is home to embassies and to the UN headquarters – these locations were not hit, but a residential building was and at least 10 people were killed, while other civilians were injured. Last month, another suspected Israeli strike near Damascus killed a senior IRGC commander.
The Syrian Arab Republic and the Islamic Republic of Iran remain close strategic allies, and the latter has provided the former with key military, financial and logistical support throughout the Syrian civil war. Moreover, Iran-backed Hezbollah fighters from Lebanon have taken direct combat roles.The Iranian Revolutionary Guard and Hezbollah have in fact been the main deterrent to the expansion of the terrorist group Daesh (the so-called Islamic State or ISIS) in the whole Levant region.
Some observers describe Iran today as “the main power” in the Middle East, and such assessment might bear some truth. This rising influence however won’t go unchallenged, but it has many supporters.
Israel’s military campaign in Gaza has been described by many international observers and organizations as an attempt at ethnic cleansing or genocide, as Tel Aviv announced a total blockade of Gaza, which stopped supplies of food, water, medical items, and energy. This has further polarized public opinion in the Middle East, the African continent and also Europe. The escalation of tensions also ensued the intensification of the long-going Iranian-Israeli war, which now extends from the Levant to the Red Sea, with global consequences.
Last week, in the US Congress, 15 Jewish members of the House released a statement saying they “strongly disagree with the prime minister” of Israel, meanwhile leading progressive members of Congress call for Washington to reset its “unconditional support of Israel”. The US radical support of the Jewish state indeed fuels anti-American feelings around the world and aggravates the crisis.
Part of the problem is the fact that Washington sees a number of actors such as the Houthis, Hezbollah and others as mere pawns of Iran. The truth is that the Islamic Republic cannot “control” its “proxies” – much the same way Washington cannot do so with its increasingly bold Israeli ally. In such a complex equation, there is a large degree of unpredictability and much room for backfiring. All the aforementioned groups have their own popular base, agenda and agency as political and social actors. And any good diplomacy must contemplate all that – which is no easy task.
In trying to oppose its Iranian adversary, Washington might end up alienating its potential Middle Eastern partners and allies – who are already investing in new relationships. The Iraqis for instance seem to be fed up with an American presence which, from their perspective, only brings trouble. And they, much like the Syrians, the Lebanese and others, might have good reasons to support and even welcome Iranian presence, influence and assistance.
reset “unconditional support of israel” when will that happen at the end of the conflict. nothing the usa says can be believed only what they do .
‘the islamic republic cannot “control” its “proxies” ‘
hezb and hths are cultural and political ‘allies’ of iran; not ‘proxies’! this is twisted murikan bs disseminated via its army of alt-media shills, many in sf.
ymn has been pounded for years by ksa (a real us proxy), lbn by isr (ditto), but neither caves nor kowtows to murika’s posturings. courageous groups like this (and states like sth afr) standing firmly up to the declining west are the only hope we have.
always iranian proxies and us allies, why can’t we start saying us proxies and iranian allies? it’s closer to d the dictionary meaning of both terms.
its the same reason everyone mocks the “special military operation” of russia and no one seems to have a problem with all the phony names the us use for their attacks on others i mean names like “operations prosperity guardian” are just calling to redicule them but no only concentrate on the russians.
scratch out closer and call it fully accurate or truthful instead.
uk proxies trying to fuck ex partner (us), as uk has turned east now teaming with china, see english balance of power policy as described by sun yat sen.
it is time to abandon these crazies in washington with their demonic system and expedite their failures and it is a matter of time.
watch as the pentacon drug-addled beast does a kabul high tail with beautiful rockets chasing its wobbly a$$ back to $lumville. it’s the end of the anglozionazi empire of filth and its blood cocktail happy hour for the dying pedovore demons. z yankee stay home.
bro, the impediment to us expulsion is the more than $250 billion of iraqi oil revenue sitting in the bank of america. it will all be confiscated.
that can’t be helped. they will grab that. iraq might as well think it’s already gone, because even if they remain an american vassal, they will not have access to it. it’s not like they can get online and transfer it to their own bank.
it’s just money that is being held hostage. and that money will never be returned. if the only reason to remain occupied is some silly hope that it might one day be released, then the iraqis can maintain that same silly hope after they kick out the yanks.
i understand what yous sayin, i also believe the turmoil that will happen when iraq inevitably faces multilateral us sanctions, if the us is evicted will heavily burden iran. iraq will quite possibly face balkanization bro. .i believe this why iran has been cautious before taking the step of evicting the us permanently from iraq.
iran is the big winner of all this
maybe this has nothing to do with iranian influence, and iraqis are just fed up with us influence?
they just do not want to stay a colonie for ever.
trying to have a diplomatic discussion with american occupation forces about leaving your country, is like trying to ask a heavily armed rapist to leave your bedroom befor his uber arrives to take him off to epstien island.
they will soon leave on their own if the axis of resistance sends a few missiles and drones to visit them every day
how cheeky and brazen the us imperialists are can be seen from the fact that despite the iraqi and syrian announcements and demands that they should leave syria and iraq, the pentagon is planning to station more than 1,000 additional soldiers in both syria and iraq. the axis of the resistance should accelerate theyr descent with constant fire under theyr arses
the us is now weak militarily and economically.this is a good time for oppressed nations to throw of its chains.