Israeli Forces Step Up Attacks On Syrian Army Near Gholan Heights, Destroy 3 Artillery Cannons

“Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of the Jews who settled along the Rhine river.”(c) which were expelled from Khazarian Kaganat (a parazitic entity that in many ways is similar to Israel that we know now) Khazarian Kaganat was destroyed in 965 by guess who? Ashkenazi remember who ended their parazitic reign back than.

PS: May be that’s a simple explanation of SolomonKrupachek’s hatred towards all Russian?

??? …ok. So we should be killing each other over things that our ancestors did?

Sviatoslav destroyed Khasarian Kaganat not because he “didn’t like” Khasarians or their religion. But because it was absolutely parasitic “state” that was terrorising areas around it. Talmudic Jeudaism doesn’t teach how to fight in open field. It teaches to enslave Goyims with usury, lies and twisting ideology (like Christianity is actually an export version of Jeudaism, where export means “For goyim use”.) That is why your phrase “we should be killing each other over things that our ancestors did?” sounds strange. IDF is good in fighting teens with cold weapons and extremely good at displacing unarmed civilians. All while keep playing victims :) Who is it “we” that “should be killing each other over things that our ancestors did?”(c) You asked (above) why isn’t Russia fighting Israel. Than you post something that sounds contrary – which is it?

Don’t worry. It wasn’t a question. But anyways, thanks for the history lesson. It doesn’t sound strange, unless you want to blame a child for the crimes of his father. It sounds sane. Like I said, two-state solution. But tell that to the leaders.

No they are not.they are mainly descendants of khazar turks who were judaized and who married into local population. Real jewish dna is in sephardi jews not askenazi.

Refer to my below comments.

And guess what : Majority of Israeli jews are sephardi jews.

Thats news to me. Maybe a very slight majority,as until recently most israelis were askenazi.when did sephardi start to tip the scale?

P.s.my guess. You are a sephardi jew as well.

Wrong guess : I am catholic.

As for what percentage, I do not exactly know. Somewhere between between 50 and 60% are the guesstimates. Shephardic and Mizrahi jews are the jews originally from Iberia and other muslim lands.

There are about 6.4M Jews in Israel. 1.4M of whom are Sephardic. How is it the “majority”?

ps – you wouldn’t be one of those white European who believes to descend form one of of the “lost tribes” by any chance?

I’m sorry, Surya is kind of Russian way to write Syria using English letters. This way if not for first letter (S) than it will be written in Russian.

Then write Syria, because clearly I wasn’t writing in Russian. No I am not. I’m Australian.

OK, US zionist vassal. Are you jewish? Ashkenazi jews by dna proof not from ME but robber/mercenary clan. This is not new information and was researched by jews themselves. The common Jew is not a zionist and are just as screwed as are every one else regardless.

There is a battle of “Sinners and Saints” (metaphor) and as George Carlin says “its a big club and you ain’t in it”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5dBZDSSky0

Oh, nice. I like George Carlin. But hey, anyone who doesn’t agree with you is a jewish zionist US vassal. Whatever name you can come up with that will help you sleep at night. No I’m not Jewish.

http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-ashkenazi-jews-dna-diseases-20140909-story.html

http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/37821/title/Genetic-Roots-of-the-Ashkenazi-Jews/

The Islamic Caliphate was also a load of shit that spread and arabised most of the arab world today, but they lay claim to everyone else’s ancestral lands that they never lived in or originated from. So you are pretty biased.

Excellent read,Kawa. However, these studies are of mitochondrial Dna.they are from mother. They do not take into account where the father came from.so still consistent with judaized khazar turk on fathers side like falashas of ethiopia having jewish paternal ancestors.

Ashkenaz in hebrew also means turkish ,so the name “german” northern and eastern european jews contains a hint of where they originally came from.

Maybe you can give me some material to read. Didn’t know that.

Kawa.i was commenting from memory but i will copy you in next time i see something of value. I love these dna studies as well.

Sad thing is we really are related to another . My mother, cousins,niece and daughter have blue eyes and i read somewhere that all blue eyed people in the world are descendants of one person who had a mutation in russian steppes five to eight thousand years ago.a blink of an eye in human history. The only reason it survived was that it happened in non sunny part of the world. If it was in tropics or desert ,it would have died out, as in long term,blue eyes give no natural evolutionary advantage in sunny climates.

The Europeans, and Kurds and Persians are descendants from those people who lived in the Caucasus. The Indo-Iranian > Indo-European >Proto-indo-european. I don’t look middle eastern at all. I have cousins that don’t look middle easter neither. I have a cousin who is redhead and has freckles. My grandfather from my mum’s side didn’t look middle eastern neither.

I know.but you did not tell me what religion your family was.that is fine ,you dont have to.

Like I have said so many times, my family’s religion will not tell you anything about me. What is with people and trying to prosecute and persecute on what their “family” or “father” believes or does.

Aside from all of this, there is much “european” blood in the mid east, from the Romans, from germanic tribe in north Africa, celtic tribes in Galatia, from the Greeks, from the crusaders, from the three million russian and ukrainian slaves taken by turks over 4 centuries etc etc.

Maybe we should forget all the sectarian BS. We are just people and who our ancesters were, that is interesting but should not be relevant to the way we as people interact.

When we don’t question the nature of mainstream propaganda and ask the questions why, we neither seek nor shall receive the understanding of truth. Then we remain subject to manipulation by those who may not have the peoples best interest at heart.

The only question that really matters: Why? “Why have we not Known?”

“When Einstein was offered the Israeli presidency, Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion stated, “I’ve had to offer him the post because it was impossible not to, but if he accepts we are in for trouble.” In a letter written in the same year, Einstein compared the Zionists’ project with that of the Pilgrims, noting, “how tyrannical, intolerant and aggressive [they] became after a short while.”

In Einstein’s last media interview, which ran in the New York Post a month before his death, he stated “We had great hopes for Israel at first. We thought it might be better than other nations, but it is no better.”

https://www.opednews.com/articles/The-only-question-that-re-by-George-King-Co-existence_Death_Fascist_Israel-170410-906.html

I don’t watch mainstream media. I read, or research as much as I can.

Let me write the way I do unless someone finds it offensive towards Syria? Anyone? If someone (like you for example) doesn’t understands what it means than I’m here to help.

Australian? What exactly – Indogenous? Anglosaxonian? Jew? (You may be calling me rasist but that’s a simple question that helps understand your background.)

I didn’t call you racist. You just made that nonsense. Why is there always a fucking JEW in there. I’m Australian, plain and simple. We aren’t racist mate.

Very good, than please answer my question “Australian? What exactly – Indogenous? Anglosaxonian? Jew? Other?” so I can better understand your background.

My ethnicity will not tell you anything about my believes. I don’t know why you make such a connection. Sounds pretty racist to me. The name says it, Kawa Asinger. I’m Kurdish.

This is ‘Very highly’ a lie. Judging from your comments and respond-comment, Tudor and George was right with their intuitions.

Your judgement is false. Next time critique yourself before you critique others. And what were they right about? The problem with people like you is that you can’t accept people with differing opinions and viewpoints. You live in a little snowflake bubbly world of safe space. Pfff. Believe whatever you want, guess it will help you sleep better at night.

It is completely irrelevant what you are. What is important here is what you say, the arguments used. Not what color, religion, gender or whatever.

Do not let yourself be put in a corner where you do not want to be.

That is why I am a dutchnational, no use discussing my background as I do not to others.

Why do you make such a problem because Tudor Miron call Syrians the way he likes. What if I call them Sirios (in my languege) Is that a problem too?

What problem? I don’t speak Russian, or your language. So how the hell would I understand you, if you don’t tell me what it means. Referring to nationalities in other languages other than a language I understand, and expecting me to understand is ignorance on your behalf.

My language is not English, so if I start taking issue on how other people call others, then this is the way arguments start. What do I care how somebody calls others in terms of their nationalities or ethnicities as long as they are not offensive?

He is a Khazar Goyim

You are racist, period. Keep making up nonsense. Bring your evidence.

You claim to be Kurdish there is no racism just genetic fact. The Khazar created the Kurds to be there Golem.

Israel is superior in weaponry and training. And Israel is capable as it has shown, to defend itself. If all those neighbours attack Israel, the US and its allies will come to its aid. Russia will stay out, at best it will sell weapons to those idiotic Arab nations. Russia will not do anything, trust me it won’t.

Israel was defeated in 2006..when israel lose more than 100 soldiers ..they use to left battle ground!..that was happen twice in Lebanon!.. once that sunni terrorist have been defeated in Syria…SAA has free hands in a war vs israel!

Israel wasn’t defeated according to your argument. Israel lost 100 soldiers, Hezbullah over 1000. I don’t think so. SAA will not go to war. Syria is useless and weak, don’t come here and attribute Russia’s hard work to the pathetic Syrians. If it wasn’t for Russia, Iran and Syria would’ve had their assess handed to them.

Don’t take things personal, if you are too emotional to refute an argument.

Russia did mess up with Libya, that’s for sure. Syria is not the red line, Syria called upon Russia, Russia would’ve sat back and watched the show if Syria hadn’t called for help. I doubt Russia will go to Libya. But I guess we’ll see.

No one won the Lebanon war. But six day war though, they did defeat a number of Arab countries. All those countries couldn’t fight back against such a small country, which they outnumbered and outgunned. I am pretty sure, the Israelis have learnt from studying the Lebanon war. It was war regardless. Amassing troops and closing the straits of Tiran, so Israel carried out a preemptive strike. I would too if I saw troops amassing on my borders. Remember Nasser closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli vessels.

• The Staits of Tiran was closed legally.

• Egypt did amass troops at its border. It resulted from Soviet intel informing Egypt that IsraHell was readying to attack Egypt. The intel was confirmed by the CIA.

• IsraHell attacked the USS Liberty (despite identifying as a US ship nine hours) prior and attacked Syria’s Golan Heights the following morning.

Nobody attacked IsraHell in 1967s IsraHell attacked and then lied it was attacked. Israeli officials admitted it was to steal/occupy more lands. This is today old news. You need to update yourself.

Whether Israelis learnt or not is not the point. You boasted about IsraHell’s military capabilities, I put you where you belong: in the shit hole.

I don’t see Israelis learning shit. They illegally invaded and occupied the south of Lebanon for twenty years and retreated like the cowards they’re are. Israeli military officials called it a “humiliating defeat”.

In 2006, IsraHell, with its IAF, IDF and 15,000+ army reserve troops could not destroy Hezbollah with 3,000 troops.

Attacking, shooting and killing unarmed civilians (Palestinians) for decades is one thing. Going after an organized and disciplined militia, another.

May IsraHell burn.

By international law blockading a port of a country amounts to a declaration of war. By closing the Straits, thereby blockading Eilath, Nasser declared war on Israel.

There is no UN or international court decree that Israel started an illegal war in 1967.

Thanks for that.

Facts nonetheless.

You are most certainly entitled to your opinion but you must know that, at the end of the day, it’s just that: your opinion. Only facts matter. You claim it was “apparent” – where is the evidence?

In the last three months of the British Mandate in 1948, the Jews militias went on attacking the unarmed Palestinian population and then lied they were attacked. In the process, they seized 400+ Palestinians towns and villages: https://www.scribd.com/mobile/document/349720246/Palestinian-towns-and-villages-attacked-and-seized-by-Israel-in-1948 It didn’t happen in the heat of battle but was planned for a decade after the 1937 Peel Commission which envisioned a small piece of Palestine for the Jews and the rest to non-Jews. The reconnaissance “missions” to identify/locate targeted towns/villages all over apLestine attest of such reality. For months, the Palestinians had begged the surrounding Arab countries to help them but in vain. King Abdullah of Jordan had actually planned on invading Palestine to divided with to-be Israel. When the news of the Deir Yassin massacre leaked out, his cabinet urged him to intervene. On May 15th 1948, the Arab armies entered Palestine – not Israel – to restore peace. The Israelis squealed they were attacked pursuant ofndelxaring independence. To date, Israelis are unable to say which land granted to them by the UNSCOP was entered/attacked.

The Jews repeated the feat in 1967: they surprise attacked and then lied they were attacked. The lie was accepted and spread by the US. While Egypt did close the Straits of Tiran legally and amassed troops at its border (following Soviet intel informing them that the Israelis were readying to attack (the intel was confirmed by the CIA)), it was Israel who attacked. The same went on with Syria: Israel attacked the USS Liberty and the following morning, attacked Syria to seize the Golan Heights.

Israel has long claimed that they were attacked but the accounts/testimonies of Israeli officials showed a different reality. There was no threat from anyone, especially not the one of annihiliation. It was purely to steal/occupy more lands in Palestine (West Bank and Gaza), Egypt (Sinai (later returned after the US forced Israel) and Syria (Golan Heights).

• Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin acknowledged that “In June 1967, we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

• Yitzhak Rabin, who would also later become Prime Minister of Israel, admitted in 1968 that “I do not think Nasser wanted war. The two divisions he sent to the Sinai would not have been sufficient to launch an offensive war. He knew it and we knew it.”

• Israelis have also acknowledged that their own rhetoric at the time about the “threat” of “annihilation” from the Arab states was pure propaganda.

• General Chaim Herzog, commanding general and first military governor of the occupied West Bank following the war, admitted that “There was no danger of annihilation. Israeli headquarters never believed in this danger.”

• General Ezer Weizman similarly said, “There was never a danger of extermination. This hypothesis had never been considered in any serious meeting.”

• Chief of Staff Haim Bar-Lev acknowledged, “We were not threatened with genocide on the eve of the Six-Day War, and we had never thought of such possibility.”

• Israeli Minister of Housing Mordechai Bentov has also acknowledged that “The entire story of the danger of extermination was invented in every detail, and exaggerated a posteriori to justify the annexation of new Arab territory.”

Thank you for the historic atmospherics, but my earlier input is not my own opinion. These are generally accepted within both the academic community, War colleges, and military professional journals. If you know anything about operational art, you should know that the factors of time, space, and force are primary considerations. If you are familiar with that region’s geography, those factors are critically important.

I am familiar – born, raised and live in Lebanon.

The very same – general consensus – can be read/heard about the 2006 Israel/Hezbollah war: that Israel waged a war on Hezbollah after it captured IDF soldiers; when in fact, diplomatic leaks and Olmert’s testimony to the Winograd Committee attest that Israel planned the war as early as January of 2006 (with the US and treacherous elements within the Lebanese governments) and that the orchestrated capture of IDF soldiers only served as casus belli.

Point being: the “generally accepted within both the academic community, War colleges, and military professional journals“ are concocted, written and spread by those who instigate the conflicts, wars and invasions in the first place. The truth always comes out later – via declassified documents, investigations, etc.

It’s worth nothing that in regards to Israel, and like the Gulf monarchies, everything it does geopolitically is dictated by their British creators/masters. I am sure you heard of Orde Wingate.

Well, right or wrong, history is written by victors, not the vanquished. Regarding the 2006 conflict, what parallel are you making to the 1967 war?

I agree, it is written by the victors. Whether wrong or right is a matter of another devate.

The parralel that whatever the mainstream media feed, people swallow.

Indeed, good point. Thanks.

So what, Romans were there before Muhammad and they called it Palestine.

Israel ceased to exist on the first century, modern israel is a spawn of USA and Soviet Union filled with khazar fake jews.

What? You don’t like current middle east countries? I have a better proposal for you:

Bring back Persia!

I was destroying the Islamic argument perspective. And Romans were calling it that to insult the Israelis. The Philistines were a different people from the modern Arab Palestinian. Before Romans called it Palestine it was Israel. That is all history. If we go all the way back, let everybody be nomads and never set up civilisation, or go back to living in caves. I didn’t think so. And Persia, is still better than the Caliphate, they were pretty democratic. I am talking about Achaemenid Empire. The Achaemenid Empire, was a Perso-Kurdic Empire. They gave people their right, and just collected taxes from their (you could say) semi-autonomous regions. But like I said, it is all history. I will never call for the annihilation of any people. 1948 There was a two state solution, Israel and Palestine, but the Arabs chose to declare war, and reject the solution.

“Before Romans called it Palestine it was Israel.”

And then Romans expeled all original jews from that land on the diaspora, and those jews went to europe and miscigenated with local population both in genes and culture, to the point they are in no way or form direct descendants of the original ones, and neither have a way to prove they are, all they have are religious arguments that have no value in modern world.

Palestines live in palestine for thousands of years, khazar fake jews are just barbarian invaders. Palestine belonged to the English Empire before the creation of Israel, it was populated by the palestines, and it was called palestine.

Israel is a 20th century creation, and the arab nations, even with frontiers carved by western powers, are composed of local populations.

Khazar, fake, palestine. If they mixed in, that makes them direct descendants buddy. If I marry an Arab and have Kids, ten generations down they are still my direct descendants. My gene’s would be still in them. So your argument is self-refuting. “Palestines live in palestine for thousands of years,” I beg to differ. They didn’t. And as you said, the Roman’s expelled them, so Israel existed but Palestine in its modern Arab identity sense did not. Philistia did exist, but they weren’t Arabs. It was called the British Mandate of Palestine the name came from the Romans, and they got it from the Philistine whom weren’t Arabs. Jews also lived in the British mandate of Palestine. You can even go to the Encyclopedia Britannica.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Philistine-people

The flag of the Mandate:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Flags_of_the_British_Mandate_of_Palestine

So what, Castro family descends from vikings who settled in Portugal, by your logic I could go to Norway and claim my citizenship there because I have a vague notion of who were my ancestrals, that’s ridiculous!

Thousands of years matter, documents matter, religious books are just relevant to followers of that religion… From Italian side I descend from cruzaders, so I too have a claim on Israel because Christ is King there and we christians are his people. Koran, Bible, Tora, they matter only for who believe them, for everything else we have international law.

That is whay I have been saying about religion. Religion shouldn’t have a role in this. Having said that Jews have a history in that land. You can’t just lie and say no they didn’t now give it back to the Arabs. Israel, Then Romans came, Then Muslims, Then Turks, Then Anglo-Saxons, Now Jews again. So according to your argument, the Jews have it for now until a time it is taken from them.

My argument is they are entitled to the borders before 67, nothing more, nothing less.

And they should stop the aggression toward their neighbors because this is real casus beli and gives grounds for everyone in the region t ocounterattack them in a brutal way.

Is that true daniel? .castro is a common iberian name.are all castros viking? Surely some are just roman latin with no viking forebears?

Yes, Castro is an old portuguese word for a sort of medieval fortification, it has the same root of the english Castle, and in fact sounds almost exactly the same word. People of this family was called like that by portuguese because they were invaders who settled in a region in portugal and lived there inside these fortifications, hardly mixing with the locals.

Vikings had a lot of influence in Portugal, to such a extent that the only place that retained the same technique of viking boat construction was in portugal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poveiro_(boat)

Cool.

The Romans didn’t call it Palestine, they latinized the name. “Filistan” in Aramaic has existed thousands of years before the Romans came.

The word is Aramaic. Filistan, comes form Philistia. The people known as Philistine. They settled in that region. They are not related to the Palestinians. And es the Romans called Palestine, i think he was just saying what the Roman’s called it, not that they invented the word.

I know what it is. I made no reference between the Philistines and Palestinians.

My only point is: the Romans did not name or call the land, they latinized its pre-existing name.

Yeah, I am saying the same thing. But hey why did you reply remember I am a: “Talmudic-Zionist vermin.”

If you meant to say the same thing, I must have misread.

About you, I am sure you heard of the following:

“The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.”

You pretend to be impartial, neutral, without an agenda, simply an “Australian”, etc. Yet, all your comments echoe the very essence of a typical, sly, hasbara-sayanim troll.

You came without any argument attacking me. Straw man argument. You attack the person instead of the argument. That speaks volumes about you. And just because I don’t agree with your point of view doesn’t make me sly, neither does it make be bias or having an agenda. Your just be delusional. You make assumptions and then follow from those baseless assumptions; thus, your argument is only against yourself.

If, as you claim, I didn’t have an argument, then I cannot have pulled a straw man argument. The very concept of a straw man argument is to divert the discussion I exploiting an unrelated new argument. I didn’t think I had to explain that.

If you’re not a troll and actually speak your own mind, based on that what you know, then I can only decude that you lack critical thinking and swallow docilely everything fed to you.

Philistans lived in the coastal region of Israel and their origin (as sea people) was until recently unknown. Some thought them to be early Greeks.

Recently it was found (by translation of old inscripts) they were a Luwian people, from around Troy. Luwians lives in Anatolia and were related to the Hittites.

You should read up on history, outside of the propaganda in state history books.

Jews never left the area totally and the Samaritans were the majority people there (no arabs at all). Jews hating the Roman Empire (and the later Byzantine Empire) for obvious reasons revolted several times up till the 7th century, as allies of the Persians. Samaritans were allies to the Romans until they ran afoul of a Byzantinium emporer and were persecuted from that day. They revaloted also many times. It can all be found in roman and byzantine archives and books.

After the muslim conquest, the majority were still Samaritans. After the crusades most Samaritans were forcibly converted to being muslims and from several muslim families in the West Bank and Nablus, it is known they used to be Samaritan in the past.

So, they are muslims, not jewish, end of story.

Actually it was Canaan before it ever became Israel.

Sure thing. But Palestinians are not the descendants of the Canaanites.

Who says? Most evidence says that they are semitic and descendants of original stock with a stratum of arab admixture.again semitic ,cousins of original Hebrews.

Who were the “original Hebrews”? Can you please explain.

Even those are just a a legend, people who worte the bible invented a lot, assimilated a lot, on biblic times what you really had were several nomadic people, there was no distinction between hebreus and arabs, it was created by whoever wrote the bible.

Several biblic accounts are a colection of stories told by ancient peoples, like sumerians.

Predisely.

Their Book says they came from Mesopotamia, invaded the land in a military fashion, killed all the inhabitants (the Canaanites) to then establish vast empires. Archeology and recent DNA studies have invalidated all those stories.

No land was conquered. See “Chapter 5: The Structure of Joshua”: http://oyc.yale.edu/transcript/955/rlst-145

No Canaanites were killed: http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017-07-28/ancient-dna-shows-canaanites-survived-biblical-slaughter/8749264

Additionally, the Old Hebrew alphabet is Canaanite-Phoenician, the deities they worshipped were Canaanite-Phoenician (Yahweh is the Phoenician God of Fertility, Adon), their first Temple (supposedly Solomon’s) was built by the Canaanites-Phoenicians, etc.

It is a coincidence that the history of the Canaanites-Phoenicians (who were the same people) has been suppressed by the Jews, Romans and later the West?

A few other points worth consider:

• None of the ancient people mention the Hebrews and/or Israelites in trade or diplomacy but they mention each other. The ancient Egyptians who wrote about everyone on their walls did not make a single allusion to them.

• All Hebrews (whoever they were) were not Jewish. Only the tribes of Yehuda, Benjamin and part of Levi were: https://www.ucg.org/bible-study-tools/booklets/the-united-states-and-britain-in-bible-prophecy/are-all-israelites-jews

• Jews practiced Pharisaism, later known as Talmudism (Tradition of the Elders), Medieval Rabbinism, Modern Rabbinism before being renamed as Judaism. Pharisaim was based on the Babylonian Code of Hammurabbi – an oligarchical system where a few on top control all below.

• Hebrews (whoever they were) practiced Yahwehism/Hebrewism.

The original ‘Hebrews” were one of the tribes, or a group of tribes, that evolved in the wider region.

Those who study the old languages have clearly shown the interrelations between old Phoenicician, Hebrew, Moabite and some other languages of the region. It is even posed some of them were mutually intelligable at some time.

Didn’t they supposedly come from Mesopotamia, invaded the land of Canaan in a military fashion, killed all the inhabitants to the estavkish vast empires? At least, that’s what their stories claim.

Old Hebrew is Phoenician; period.

Why was the story of the Canaanites/Phoenicians suppressed by the ancient Jews, Romans and later the West?

All old peoples claim either to have lived there forever or to have come from somewhere. As most were semi nomadic, illiterate, the histories were verbal.

Over the centuries, stories gradually changed a bit.

It is often stories were both correct. A new group came, conquered the lands, were the “Masters” for a few generations and then were incorperated into the older stratum. Happened in China many times, France – normans, Bulgaria (Bulgars were turkic nomands conquering and being incorperated into thew slav stratum, only retaining their name), germanic tribes in North Africa and Iberia etc etc.

For present day politics, it is hardly relevant.

You’re diverting and extrapolating to brush it off as irrelevant.

The point is that the ancient Jews, Romans and later the West have suppressed the history of the Canaanites/Phoenicians and/or have hijacked their achievements as theirs.

Yes Arabs are semites, so are Assyrians. I know this.

You love exploiting people’s ignorance don’t you you slimy Talmudic-Zionist vermin.

Most Palestinians have Levantine DNA. This is old news old.

The European and Eastern European Jews in Palestine pretending to be Semitic – aka “Israelis” so not.

Todays Lebanese are:

The study found that over 90 per cent of the ancestry of modern-day people from Lebanon was derived from the Canaanites.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017-07-28/ancient-dna-shows-canaanites-survived-biblical-slaughter/8749264

Lebanese and Palestinian are not the same. “Talmudic-Zionist vermin.” Why are you getting personal? if you can’t argue, then don’t.

Don’t fall for his Zionist manure.

The Romans didn’t call or name the land, they latinized its existing name.

As far as your comment goes, the land of Canaan didn’t become Israel. That’s is incorrect. None of the Biblical stories are true. There was no military conquest of the land, no killing of the inhabitants, no establishment of “Hebrew” Empires. Archeology has invalidated all those fallacies.

I agree with you.i did not want to go into too much detail here.since you asked we might tell our readers a liitle bit more of what we know.

Latest research ,very hard to go against ,proves Hebrews were simply an offshoot of original canaanites living there. There was no hebrew invasion,no killing of jebusites etc.simply one lot of canaanites separated themselves from the rest and kept themselves that way.a bit like dangerous cults like jonestown and waco cult.

Thank you for clarifying.

While I don’t think the “Waco Cult” was dangerous – I think the people involved were demonized to justify the disproportionate government response – the Jonestown massacre cannot be more on point. The indoctrination (the Holocaust and mythical Siege if Masada) going on in IsraHell is identical to the preaching of Jones: collective suicide. I invite you to read the two pages Editorial in the following link:

http://wlym.com/archive/campaigner/7812.pdf

Thanks Omega. I will read. It will take me some time to get back to you though as it is fifty seven pages.

Most welcome. At your convenience. If you can, the two-pages “Editorial” was on point with what you brought up: Jonestown massacre.

Massadah is not mythical at all. The romans have written extensively about the siege and all and we still have the texts. The fort and the ramp the Romans built are still there to see and have seen it myself too.

Never said the fort did/does not exist. The archeology to back up the story doesn’t exist or is inconclusive.

I refer you to the roman history books, written at the time itself. They are conclusive.

I either miscommunicated or your misunderstood. The fort, ramps, etc are there. It’s the story of how some Jewish families escaped there to survive from the Romans that doesn’t add up. The accounts of Josephus and the archeology don’t match. In a nutshell, the story is an invention aimed at fueling patriotism. You can read about it here:

The Masada Myth https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biblianazar/esp_biblianazar_55.htm

“Don’t fall for his Zionist manure.” It is called a logical argument. You’re the only one with a filthy mouth.

For your augment to be logical, it would first have to be unbiased. It isn’t.

Instead of correcting Brother Ma – that the Land of Canaan became Israel – you went on with it.

For an argument to be logical, you don’t have to be impartial. I am putting forth an argument, and it is logical because I am not attacking anyone personally or making disgusting claims like you. Go educate yourself, then talk about what is logical or not.

Your comments/arguments are neither logical nor impartial. They are based on the Zionist narrative which distorts history, religious history and reality as a whole.

The Land of Canaan didn’t become Israel. You should know that but instead, you went on agreeing. How are you logical or impartial?

The Romans didn’t call the land. They latinized the existing name.

Who cares what the koran says? Some of us were there before the moslems arrived in middle east anyway and before jews came to palestine.

Tell that to the Palestinians who will Kill for saying that. They claim the dome of the rock because of religion. Many things they do, is because of religion.

Fanatics are idiots, it doesn’t matter from which people they come.

God damn, finally someone agrees with me. Exactly, we have to deal with reality. Israel exists – fact. So, how do we fix this Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Withouth baseless historic claims to land- except recent. Because if we go back in time no one owned any land, we were just wanderers on this earth.

67 borders, and kurdistan is a big huge no, unless Iran, Turkey, Iraq and Syria allow.

Kurdistan has a history spanning further back in history than the Israelis or Palestinians. One step at a time. 67 borders, nah mate, they want the annihilation of Israel. Look at HAMAS. Remove the PLO and HAMAS and Palestine will be born.

Problem is, world peace is founded upon UN charter which protects current nation state borders at all costs, internal matters are to be settled by the laws of respective countries.

UN charter also protect populations like kurds, if any government decides to ethnic cleansing, but it is more complex as any military action depends on UNSC approval.

This is a very solid, petrified system, so it will be very hard for kurdistan, and even catalunia and the like to become countries, the best way is to be a part of such countries, to be brothers to the point where political borders won’t matter, or such countries would willingly allow the independence of these regions.

Any other option will only bring hatred, chaos and death to the world.

I would rather live in Catalonia under Spanish rule, Then any part of Kurdistan under the neighbouring countries. Yes, Looking to redraw maps is hard. That is why Kurds have to take it a step at a time and not rush. Rushing will cause a retaliation against them. Right now Iraq is on good terms with the Kurds, and slowly it will get better hopefully.

You wouldn’t say that under the rule of Generalissimo Franco, not if were basque at least.

Now the majority of catalonia do want to be a part of Spain, those who voted to indepence were a minority of provocateurs, and they are playing with fire, latin people can be very brutal if needed.

But Europe is more stable than Middle East. Just look at the History in the middle east. Genocide after Genocide, against their own time after time. Everyone from the Middle East runs to the west for a reason.

Nowadays Europe is mre stable, but the scale of hatred, violence and destruction of WW2 in Europe is yet to be seen in history.

Kurds would probably stay with semi-autonomy for now.

So do zionist israelis.

Thanks for figuring that out. I was replying to your comment. I know there are Jews who will kill fellow jews who marry outside their religion, or extremely xenophobic against other people. I have read and seen them.

Another nail on the cofin of your argument.

Here in Brazil we have the New Christians, which were Jews forced to convert to catholicism when they came here:

Oliveiras, Carvalhos, Coelhos, Teixeiras, Pereiras… it is a long list of numerous very commom families, millions of people who descend from spanish Jews, millions and more millions, if you take them all to ISrael people would have to take turns to sit, and they are all Roman Catholic mixed with brazilian natives and blacks.

Let’s take all this people to Israel too, let’s see how that will work out.

No nail in my coffin. My argument is a two-state solution. And you can’t forcibly take people elsewhere.

I’m saying these people are also genetic jews, so they are also entitled to israeli citizenship, let’s see what the current people in Israel will say about it.

The argument is the same, they descend from jews, so they own the land too…

Yes, true. I get it. But Israel doesn’t say bring them all here. They whoever wants to come back. But realistically, If they all did go back, Israel can’t handle it. So it would probably stop them. It is self-destruction.

They say, bring all jews, but they say that to religious jews, or traditional european jew, even if atheist, if you take all real jewish descendents they won’t accept… Well, they treated the black jews like crap too, so it seems you need to be a religious jew, and not black, then you will be accepted.

Any way you look at this it just stands as a fraud, they are invaders, period. It was really a shame europe, UN recognized Israel in the first place, but what is done is done.

Everyone is an invader. At one point in time, someone invaded someone else. That doesn’t fix any problems. Turks invaded Anatolia but they won’t give it back. Just look at Kurdistan, a place where no Arabs existed now Arabs have settled there and won’t leave. So that makes Arabs invaders. That argument is nonsense.

Yes, there is a double standard. But all politicians have double standards, that’s politics.

Daniel.you already know i love history. The names above.surely there are some that were never jewish.like weiss and meyer ,usually jewish but not absolutely always.

Why would they name themselves as jewish if they were forced to abandomn their heritage? They adopted names of trees and animals to replace their own, however the most common of them is Oliveira, which come from Olive, like in the city of the olives, Jerusalem.

I didnt say they gave themselves jewish surnames only that some germans ,who swear they have no jewish blood ,have surnames commonly used by and associated with jews.

Who knows ,maybe they were Jews centuries ago, yet the current descendants do not know it.

Hitler’s leaders and generals,pfeiffer,franks,michaelis all nomally jewish names but not in their case?

These are families of converted jews, the inquisition forced them to convert to stay here, they picked up names of trees and animals to replace their jewish names, but now after centuries there is almost no trace of jewish culture on them, most being roman catholic and now some few are evangelics.

Indeed, many of them are ignorant of their backgrounds and will feel insulted if you tell them they have a jewish background. Yet there are still some few who are trying to become jewish again nowadays…

Yes i heard abour many cryptojews coming out.apparently,a whole village in northern portugal has tried to get in touch with jewish roots again. It starts with b but i forgot the name.

Also temer ,whats with him? I heard he was orthodox but now changed to catholic.i suppose he had to in majority catholic brazil.

Temer is syrio-lebanese, but don’t hold any hope for him, he is a master politician, but completely corrupt, he will deal with anyone, absolutely anyone, I even think these accusations of him being a CIA agent are a misconception, fact is he deals with CIA, but will deal with chinese or russians too, he plays everyone.

Temer actually never had any interest in being president, he just took over power because he saw Dilma Roussef had screwed badly and would throw him to the dogs to save herself, so he acted first, now he only manages to stay in power because he is bribing his way through the olygarchy he knows so well.

I don’t know, really don’t know how we’re going to get a real leadership for Brazil, for now we’re just avoiding falling in the same pit that Venezuela is…

A pity.Brazil has so much potential.all climates,all minerals,tourism ,agriculture etc My concern is law and order outside the cities.i have seen too many horrible videos of machete murders of narcos and just between townspeople in interior. Why does it seem that people have to take justice into their own hands?

It is indeed well known that many of the early settlers in Brasil and Spanish Americas were “converted” jews.

When the Dutch took Recife and Bahia for a few decades some converted back to judaism and left for Curacao (dutch west indies) with the Dutch after the Portugese took the cities back again.

The oldest still existing synagogue of the Americas still stands on that island.

Kawa.you said you were kurdish.shouldn’t you be claiming the dome of the rock as well?

Why would I claim the Dome of the Rock??