0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,100 $
10 DAYS LEFT UNTIL THE END OF DECEMBER

Japan May Deploy US Military Bases in Southern Kuril Islands?

Support SouthFront

Japan has admitted a possibility of placing US military bases on the two islands of the southern Kuril Islands. While this looks not likely, but Russia has already a negative expirience in such issues. For example, the NATO expanded into eastern Europe after the USSR withdrew its forces from the region.

Japan May Deploy US Military Bases in Southern Kuril Islands?

US Marine’s Osprey aircraft sit in close proximity to a crowded urban area of Ginowan, Okinawa prefecture (Photo: Getty Images / AFP / Toru Yamanaka)

Tokyo does not rule out a possibility of placing US military bases on the two islands of the southern Kuril Islands, the Asahi newspaper reported, citing the words of Secretary of the National Security Council of Japan, Shotaro Yachi. The statement was made during the Yachi’s visit to Moscow in November.

“Since November, Japan’s optimism [in respect of progress on the territorial issue] began to weaken. In early November, Secretary of the Japanese National Security Council, Shotaro Yachi, arrived to Moscow and met with Secretary of the Russian Security Council, Nikolai Patrushev. According to numerous government sources, Patrushev asked whether US bases to be placed on the islands in the case of transfer of the two islands to Japan, as it is specified in the Joint Declaration [of 1956]. Yachi answered that there is such an opportunity,” the article reads.

Earlier, the press service of the Russian Security Council reported that issues of regional and international security were discussed during the meeting between Patrushev and Yachi in Moscow on November 9. The sides paid a special attention to the “major challenges and threats in the Asia-Pacific region, as well as to the Russian-Japanese security cooperation.”

The newspaper also cites the opinion of government officials, who believe that the Yachi’s answer was obvious: if the islands are under the sovereignty of Japan, the security agreement between Tokyo and Washington will be valid on their territory too.

According to the article, it is the main reason of lowering of the degree of expectations of progress in the negotiations on the territorial issue of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe that was especially clearly seen during his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Lima at the end of November. After the summit in Peru, Abe, who did not conceal his optimism about the Putin’s upcoming visit to Japan before, said that the “achievement of a considerable step right away is impossible,” and the “main thing is to move step by step,” as a “single meeting cannot solve the problem, which could not be solved during 70 years.”

On Tuesday, Putin said in an interview with the Japanese Nippon TV (NTV) TV-company that attempts to talk about Japanese sovereignty in the southern Kuril Islands from the “first step” would close the further discussion of the issue.

“You raised the question that economic activities can be developed on the islands [the southern Kuril], the sovereignty over which will be belonged to Japan. If it will be from the first step, then the second step is not necessary. Because the issue can be considered closed. Because we did not agree about it,” the Russian President noted.

Japan claims on Iturup, Kunashir, Shikotan and Habomai islands, referring to the bilateral tractate on trade and borders of 1855. Tokyo made the return of the islands a condition of concluding a peace treaty with Russia, which was not signed after the end of the Second World War.

According to Moscow, the southern Kuril Islands became a part of the Soviet Union as the result of the Second World War, and the Russian sovereignty over them has a corresponding international legal formalization.

The Joint Declaration of 1956 regarded the transfer of Habomai and Shikotan to Tokyo after conclusion of the peace treaty; however, the fate of Kunashir and Iturup was not touched.

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
AMHants

The US have demanded Japan gets the Islands back and allows them to place a military base on them. They cannot handle not encircling Russia. Surely Russia knows this and will refuse to allow Japan access to the Islands?

pietro del prete

Russia to not give Kurilj islands to Japan!

Barba_Papa

So……, Japan wants the islands back, and doesn’t rule out that there may be a US military base on them if that were to happen? Wow, they really know how to offer the Russians a sweet deal now, do they?

John Mason

They also want the islands that go from Japan to just north of Taiwan, so does the US.

Brad Isherwood

Meanwhile….. http://defence-blog.com/news/us-marine-mv-22b-osprey-crashes-near-okinawa-in-japan.html

Gary Sellars

The Japanese unilaterally abrogated the Treaty of Saint Peterberg 1875, where Tsarist Russia recognised Japanese soverignty over the Kurils (and withdrew its colonies) in exchange for Japanese recognition of Russia rights over Sakhalin. Japanese agression during the later Russo-Japanese war negated the treaty, and it took 40 years before Russia (under the Soviets) could reassert their claims.

The morale of this story is that if your commit agression against your neighbours, and then lose, the loss of territory is a real possibility. Germany has permanently lost sovereignty over her traditional eastern baltic territories, and you don’t hear Angela Merkel whining constantly and demanding the return of Danzig (now Gdansk) and Pomeranian in Western Poland…

Furthermore, Russia will never give up the Kurils as its a matter of national survival. Were they to return to Japanese rule, they would allow the US would militarise them and further encircle and threaten Russian access to the open ocean. Never going to happen, no way. and considering Japans’ agression and horrendous wartime atrocities (particulary against the Chinese & Koreans) the Japanese deserve not a single grain of Kuril sand.

Gary Sellars

Japan has no case they renounced any claim to the Kurile Islands in Article 2 (c) of the Treaty of San Francisco. They can’t just change their mind and get them back. They will never get them back so they should just stop moaning about it.

CHAPTER II

TERRITORY

Article 2

(a) Japan recognizing the independence of Korea, renounces all right, title and claim to Korea, including the islands of Quelpart, Port Hamilton and Dagelet.

(b) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.

(c) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to the Kurile Islands, and to that portion of Sakhalin and the islands adjacent to it over which Japan acquired sovereignty as a consequence of the Treaty of Portsmouth of 5 September 1905.

gmatch

It is not so much known that the Chinese who invaded Taiwan ethnic cleansed the native population by murdering 1.5 million of them.

Nexusfast123

Maybe a heads up from the Japanese as to potential US mischief.

gmatch

Japan is still grateful for the US nukes in Hiroshima/Nagasaki. I don’t have any respect for the Japan people.

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x