0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
2,180 $
10 DAYS LEFT UNTIL THE END OF NOVEMBER

Jeffrey Sachs Trashes U.S.’s New York Times And UK’s Guardian, As Lying War-Mongerers

Support SouthFront

Jeffrey Sachs Trashes U.S.'s New York Times And UK's Guardian, As Lying War-Mongerers

Click to see the full-size image

Written by Eric Zuesse.

Jeffrey Sachs, in an interview on June 14th by The Duran, presented the history behind the war in Ukraine, and described how this issue of preventing American missiles in Ukraine from being directed five minutes away at Moscow, is for Russia what in the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis the same as what preventing Soviet missiles in Cuba from being directed 30 minutes away at Washington DC was (an uncompromisable national-security “red line” and thus not even possibly permissible to cross), and he described there how opposite U.S. President Biden is from what both JFK and Khrushchev were in the 1962 version. He blamed Biden 100% for the war in Ukraine (exactly the opposite of what both Kennedy and Khrushchev were), and he described (100% accurately) the history to prove that this terrifying picture of Biden is actually the case. 

However, he especially damned the mainstream news media in both the U.S. and the UK as being blatant war-mongering liars. He singled out most especially (because these two newspapers are so unjustifiably honored and trusted by so many people in The West) Britains’s Guardian, and America’s New York Times. Here, then, is from the video‘s transcript:

“Security guarantees w/ Jeffrey Sachs (Live)”

The Duran, 14 June 2023

15:16  [completely relevant for what we have today.] First of all, Kennedy knew both

15:22  sides had led to the war, both sides had led to the near global destruction, both

15:31  sides needed to back off, both sides wanted peace, and

15:36  this is where we are today, exactly the same thing except we have this drum beat,

15:43  crazy drumbeat in the media, which you two so wisely talk about every day and

15:49  report on, which is insane — by the way led by the British. I, I respect the British,

15:55  who speak English so much better than we do, it’s yours — but this Russophobia in

16:01  Britain is so deep, it’s about 200 years old, it’s so simple-minded.

16:08  I used to even read the Guardian by the way, now I can’t even go to the website it’s unbelievable. By the way, that’s how

16:15  our New York Times is. It’s it’s unreadable, it’s phony, it’s propaganda,

16:21  from morning till night it’s so completely one-sided, and no one tells

16:26  the history of anything, and I tried to publish that piece in the

16:31  New York Times, well they rejected it in 10 seconds, uh and more more than that, I tried to publish anything in the New

16:38  York Times and they said no. What they want[ed me] to say is, it’s an unprovoked invasion, and we’re facing a madman, and

16:46  there’s no one to talk to, and war is the only way, and NATO enlargement is the

16:51  only way, and diplomacy can’t work. And every lesson of history is ignored — that’s where we are, that’s where we are.

NOTE: The present reporter has not asked the Guardian and the New York Times for a response, because they — like all of the war-mongering (or “neoconservative”) ‘news’-media — are, themselves, large ‘news’-organizations, and moreover are controlled by billionaires; so, they possess, on their own, plenty of opportunities and facilities to respond to what Professor Sachs said about them; and, if they want to respond to it, should say it directly to him, and publish it and his response to it to the world, if they want to respond to it, at all (which I don’t expect either of them to do, because their custom in such matters is not to respond publicly to accusations that they routinely and systematically lie, since they don’t want to call to the public’s attention any such accusations: they want to keep their subscribers, not shun them away by publishing such accusations and engaging in any honest public debates about what, and who, and why, they are, and what they actually have done, and have been doing, especially if that might be honestly characterizable as selling propaganda to the public, instead of as journalism).

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s new book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Buford T Justice

truth teller , he’s a good man . shunned by the establishment for that very reason .

hash
hashed
I Ukruck watch, clean L. Austin's cum from my wife

my daughter himara works in amsterdam as call girl for a pimp from nigeria

hash
hashed
JackSmith

the guardian is run by jews. white jews come from ukraine. do i need to say anymore?

thoughtful

ash k nazis

Nobodyinparticular

gaddafi was shown on live tv news pictures as having been captured alive, then later they showed he’d been killed. by the evening all the western msm had changed the story to saying he had been killed before being captured – it wasn’t even consistent with their own coverage over the day! terrible liars indeed.

hash
hashed
thoughtful

the photos were weird and terrible, not properly clear but still horrid. the photos were hacked.

Lenny

america can not exist as a democracy without a free press as it now becomes a reflection of the lies in the media.

hash
hashed
Madam Defarge

the new york times and the guardian are trash, so mr. sachs was just repeating the truth.

hash
hashed
Uncle Ho

refreshing to hear from a man who is not a coward in the west. this man is an endangered species in the empire of lies. surely the incompetent and petulant children running the sham will retaliate against this brave man for embarrassing them. europe better remember that solzhenitsyn recommended banding up with kitchen knives and farm implements and fighting would have been more effective than simply doing nothing.

hash
failed
Gordon

this man was one of the architects of the yeltsin fiasco… straight outa ‘harvard’ for the cia…

maybe he’s just full of shit… playing both sides for his ‘team’…

Eric Zuesse

he later apologized for that and disowned the mainstream economic theory, which he had believed in.

12
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x