0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,100 $
11 DAYS LEFT UNTIL THE END OF DECEMBER

Kyrgyzstan – Next In Line For A Colour Revolution?

Support SouthFront

Kyrgyzstan – Next In Line For A Colour Revolution?

Illustrative Image

Written by Gavin O’Reilly

The accession of Kyrgyzstan to chair of the Commonwealth of Independent States for 2023 should bode well for the central Asian republic. Having not held the position since 2016, Kyrgyzstan’s new role in the CIS, a transnational Eurasian body intended to foster economic and military development, will likely spur economic growth in what is the poorest country in the region.

Going by recent trends related to the two most recent chairs of the CIS however, Belarus in 2021 and Kazakhstan last year, it also may mean that Bishkek has now been placed in the sights of the regime change lobby.

In August 2020, following Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko’s electoral victory over opposition candidate SviatlanaTsikhanouskaya, a US-orchestrated regime change operation would be launched against Minsk, owing to it being Moscow’s sole European ally, its nationalised state industries, and in what was perhaps the most pertinent factor at the time, Lukashenko’s refusal to implement the lockdown measures as part of the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset initiative.

Violent protests, backed by US NGO the National Endowment for Democracy, would sweep the former Soviet state in the aftermath of the election, continuing for several months before finally being quelled by Minsk, with Lukashenko’s government remaining intact.

This would not be a fate shared by neighbouring Ukraine, with Kiev having been subjected to the Euromaidan regime operation in 2013-14 which resulted in a Western-backed coalition coming to power. A situation, that had it occurred in Belarus in 2020, would have resulted in the precarious situation where Russia’s entire western border was composed solely of NATO-members and allies.

Likewise, in Russia’s southern neighbour Kazakhstan, protests in response to rising fuel prices in early 2022 would rapidly escalate into extreme violence in the space of several days, resulting in the deaths of 18 members of the Kazakh security services, including two who were decapitated.

The sudden, violent nature of the Kazakh protests, as well as their coordinated coverage by the corporate media, bore all the hallmarks of a Western-backed colour revolution. Indeed, this was effectively confirmed as such by a May 2020 policy document published by neoconservative think tank the RAND Corporation, which envisaged the destabilisation of Kazakhstan as having a spill-over effect into neighbouring Russia, the 7,000km long border between both nations being the 2ndlargest in the world after the US and Canada.

This is where the potential for a colour revolution attempt in Kyrgyzstan comes into play.

Though a small country, Kyrgyzstan’s geographical location, to the west of the Xinjiang region of China, means that a Maidan-style colour revolution in the country would ultimately have a spill-over effect into its larger eastern neighbour, specifically into a region known for extremist activity, such as that ofETIM, a group which previously fought with the Al-Nusra Front in Syria, and which bombed the Chinese Embassy in Bishkek in a 2016 attack.

Indeed, destabilising Kyrgyzstan as a means to trigger a Domino effect which would ultimately destabilise China, ties in perfectly with the recent activity of the regime change lobby.

Just last month,protests against Beijing’s ‘zero-Covid’ policies quickly escalated into demands for the removal of Xi Jinping from office, a situation conspicuously envisaged by Open Society founder George Soros in a January 2022 address to the Hoover Institution. Despite also receiving the support of the NED, this attempt at regime change would quickly falter due to Beijing acceding to the demands of legitimate protesters and removing lockdown restrictions, resulting in the corporate media switching to a ‘Covid is spreading again’ narrative.

However, with Kyrgyzstan’s new role as chair of the CIS, and what happened with the two previous holders of the position, 2023 may see another attempt at regime change in China, one that could possibly begin in its smaller western neighbour.

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard Steele

Kyrgyzstan should help preempt this situation by expelling all western NGOs now.

hash
hashed
Антон

NGOs are giving bribes to officials and helping other people to became officials to provide pro-western policy and to rob money from state budget, so NGOs will stay for sure. Small countries without long tradition of independence have no experience and even will to fight against “soft power”, i.e. spy-style methods of influence. Even ancient countries and not so small can’t resist sometimes. Whole EU is under Washington now.

Cromwell

Why are these CIA/NGOs still in these Countries ? they should have been sent packing years ago.

hash
hashed
Last edited 1 year ago by Cromwell
Антон

Sent or being imprisoned for espionage and sabotage.

Bobo

All Western NGOs should be expelled from any country where they are causing trouble and promoting protests and violence against the state and the law abiding population. Everyone knows that NGOs are nothing but fronts for Western intelligence services and are used be foreign governments to destabilise countries they wish to control…….

hash
hashed
Mexican Overlord

Modern China is a project of the West! It is 99.99% a design of the internationalists ok? So why is everyone assuming that China is a sovereign State? Why is humanity so stupid?

hash
hashed
Антон

Not so stupid while 7 of 8 billion people doesn’t support west in its aggression against Russia. And yes, China is one of few really independent states on Earth as much as it can be independent in our globalized world where all countries depends from others as resource/technology suppliers or trade markets for goods, this is normal dependence. And you know, sHitler really was the project of international bankers, but broke the leash and bitten his masters, because every puppet dreams about independent action, if have enough resources to go away from external guidance.

Chris Gr

Actually, we need regime change in US vassals.

hash
hashed
Cleaning Time, Ju.S.A.

Actually, we need regime change in Ju.S.A.

Chris Gr

They are not Jews but Illuminati.

Anatolio Mamontow

How about a regime changing in United States? Let’s them taste their own poison. Russia and have the means and “techniques” to do regime changing in a dirty, decrepit and decaying America.

Chris Gr

Texans autonomists, Californian autonomists, Cascadian autonomists, Chicanos and Afros.

Hakkol Havel

Poison for the government, medicine for the masses.

Kev not Kiev

The Kyrgyzstan people need to kick out the NGOs and every organ harvesting human trafficker with an Israeli passport asap. Or hang em from lamp posts. You know Mossad killed those cops, ISIS style, hallmark Zionist brutality and terror excesses…typical of a socially arrested cult of child killers.

hash
failed
Антон

Not the first time. Kirgizia has tendency to change their gov-t before end of terms, it’s permanent political crisis, lack of trust to politicians and common instability for small countries without long history and tradition of independent governing. So they can change current administration and go to Putin for next 0,5 billion annual grant.

hash
hashed
23
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x