0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,000 $
OCTOBER 2024

Militants Threaten Oil And Gas Infrastructure in Algeria

Support SouthFront

If you’re able, and if you like our content and approach, please support the project. Our work wouldn’t be possible without your help: PayPal: southfront@list.ru or via: http://southfront.org/donate/ or via:https://www.patreon.com/southfront

Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) militants fired rocket propelled grenades at the Salah gas facility in Algeria on March 18. Despite there were no casualties or damage reported, the Norwegian oil and gas company Statoil and the British oil and gas company BP plc, which mange the attacked infrastructure, have announced that they will temporarily withdraw some of their staff from two natural gas treatment plants.

The Statoil-BP infrastructure in Algeria was already attacked in 2013 resulting in the death of 40 oil workers on the In Amenas facility located near the Libyan border. Unlike 2013, the recent attack was made from the territory of Mali on the up-country object which shows significant problems in the Algerian security.

Furthermore, AQIM released a video statement threating an attack on Statoil-BP facilities in few hours prior to attack. Considering that militants were able to transport and use 130-mm rockets and launchers, it becomes clear that the Algerian security services aren’t able to provide security for the crucial country’s infrastructure.

An important fact is AQIM’s video included a demand for foreign companies to cut the links with the Algerian government and a suggestion to launch negotiations on terms of future works on the development of gas and oil fields. In other words, AQIM asks money for safety of Statoil-BP facilities. The video also included a threat of non-demonstration attack if AQIM’s demands will be ingored. This is likely why Statoil and BP have decided to temporarily withdraw staff from the gas facilities.

Nonetheless, it couldn’t be ignored that AQIM can just carries out an order of some foreign power which pursues own interests in the region. For instance, Saudi Arabia has differences with Algeria on the conflicts in Yemen, Syria and Iran. In this case, the recent attack showed that Algeria is vulnerable for such unfriendly acts.

In the contemporary situation, the Algerian government will seek to demonstrate that it’s able to control the situation in the country. This issue becomes especially acute amid ISIS’ statements to open the war against Algeria.

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nizam

Warmongers who destroyed and looting Libya now eyes Algeria. Unless Russia helps, Algeria will have to follow the suit of Libya. May Almighty save Algerian people.

Christopher Corvino

take off you tinfoil hate please.

Nizam

I love humanity and hate inhumanity.

Christopher Corvino

Ah ha. Why is it always the looney tunes types who try and act like phony saviors?

Citizenofnextworld

KSA (Saudi + Wahhabist) gang corporation days are numbered, their imminent collapse est with absolute certainty, it’s not question of if, but of when, yet are hell bent not to go down quietly, by causing misery to those who objected to them and stood on their way. Not long ago Mr. Lavrov warned Algeria to be ready and allert for a strategic heinous agenda against the state. Algeria should not be too confident by request assistance from Russia immediately, her lifelong ally. Also, it about time Algeria close down gulf sheikhdom embassies to include Turkey — and to show them the exit door. As well as outlaw and kick out all foreign NGOs from the country. ISIS leader was helped and assisted by Turkey to escape to Libya where he is at large. He is a potential threat while he is still alive. He is cabal asset and vassal in Nortn Africa.

Alberto Campos

You’re right, but on the other hand Russia has no naval base in Algeria to secure – as she had in Syria. So, either they decide to have one, or they won’t come to help Algeria in any way.

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x