0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
100 $
NOVEMBER 2024

Military Equipment Russian Army Will Receive In 2023 (Infographics)

Support SouthFront

Military Equipment Russian Army Will Receive In 2023 (Infographics)

Source: TASS. Translated by SouthFront

On January 10, Russian TASS news agency published infographics on the military equipment that the Russian Army will receive in 2023.

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Vladimir Lenin

Learn Ukraine! Those who make their own weapons win the game. Without your colorful little friends you would have fallen as a state.

hash
hashed
Peter Jennings

We western cash cows have, since WWII, been told that our weapons are superior to ‘Soviet’ weapons. Everyone knows differently these days. I’m betting that President Putin and his military staff are itching to use their new additions, and who could blame them after the barrage of blame and abuse they have received from western career, albeit short, shyster politicians.

RussianEmpire

They still have no adequate weapons against 5th column (as usual)…. Enemy inside Russia is much stronger than Ukraine.

hash
hashed
Peter Jennings

Maybe via the jewish networks, as was done before. These networks still operate. Could be the reason why President Putin has been turning a blind eye towards the isreali apartheid regime to keep them sweet.

Bobo

The submarines and the TU.160s are a game changer as nato fears the submarine fleet being used against their aircraft carriers the TU.160s can deliver a mighty blow against any adversary and don’t forget the ability and the will is all we need to be successful…….

hash
hashed
MotherRussia

The upgraded TU 160 along with Zircon (when an air launched version is deployed) will absolutely be a game changer.

Last edited 1 year ago by MotherRussia
Dan Lavatan

Yes, but the surface ships are just targets. The west feels a need to waste money on them for political reasons, if the Russians want to prosper they should avoid wasting resources on them.

Christopher

1 expensive US carrier v s n small Russian surface ships all carrying weapons that can sink the carrier, and its support vessels. As the Americans say, you do the maths. “The fiercest serpent may be overcome by a swarm of ants.”Isoroku Yamamoto

Gomzi

Will they reci e any shoe or a jacket or something to eat in the front line ?

hash
hashed
Raptar Driver

The Arsenal of freedom. Russia will save the world again, thank you.

hash
hashed
Mr. Gorilla Monsoon

The world should not be reliant on any one nation or any one person to do anything. People, organizations, and nations need to get up off their behinds and become active and stop waiting for someone else to do something.

AliG

Very useless systems fir the SMO in Ukraine. Does someone expect a big sea battle there?

hash
hashed
Hamid K

Russia is preparing to confront with the collective west, it has to expect any kind of aggression. And yet not to forget Odessa 😉.

maharaja

The ships take a dozen years to make. So these ships if they actually hand them over would have been bought and built probably some 12 years before the smo. Unless they are the very small ships! the 800 ton they take about six or seven years each. Pretty fast with subs but boats … nope!

Din

The facts is there scared with the boats.

Irish gerry

But…but I thought russia was losing and running out of everything lol

hash
failed
Martillo

Natostan is being destroyed and without it USSA will undoubtedly shrink back to Slumville where it belongs.

Thank you Mother Russia for stopping the evil EUSSR and the rest of the Satanic angloZionaZi empire of shit.

Z

hash
hashed
Mr. Gorilla Monsoon

I’m all for Russia, but you still need to replace the guided missile cruiser you lost. And the aircraft carrier needs modernization still. The weapons displayed on the graphic only show the more strategic weapons and not all the tanks, armored vehicles, drone’s, etc that will be produced.

hash
failed
19
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x