Nasrallah Vows To Shoot Down Israeli Drones Over Lebanon, Respond To Airstrikes On Damascus

Largely a FACTUAL statement, however one Zionist F-16I was downed by a fluke SA-2 strike a couple of years ago over the occupied Golan, since then the Ruskie and Syrian supposed S-300 and 400 are being used as decoration pieces and flower pots and done fuckall at daily Zionist air strikes all across the region now. As an old professional soldier raised with notions of honor, such collective cowardice is beyond belief.

Israel is waiting for Hezbollahs retaliation so they can launch the war, the question is will Hezbollah pussy out, the Iranians already have

Yeah, they can and get theirs ass kicked. As for Israeli mighty jets, remember that super fly f35 that was downed by Syria? Nowadays Hezbollah have some AA surprises for Zionistic jets.

The F-35 was barely a military-industrial-congressional wet dream when the US military was destroying Yugoslavia. It was an F-117 Goblin that was shot down. That was the war that pumped cash and new life into NATO by transforming it from a supposed defensive alliance against the USSR into a US rubber-stamp “coalition” to attack of lightly defended peoples who live on top of valuable natural resources. It was Clinton’s introduction of the “humanitarian bombing” concept or how to make a war crime sound like a good thing.

Only good thing that Nato did then was bringing down Milosevic.

That was not a good thing. Naser Oric and Franjo Tudjman started the war, were real demons guilty of atrocities, war crimes and crimes against humanity and got away with it.

Naser started a War? He was not in power nor in position to start anything. Tudjman did, and you’re very right there that he got away, almost got away. He was as guilty as Milosevic, but all of them together with sda party are pretty guilty. Istebegovic just pour some more gasoline on fire. And all of them were CIA payed and inaugurated.

My mistake. Oric just liked to torture Serb villagers to death and even bragged about the people he had tormented to death. Now he burns for eternity, but I want the story told to awaken Americans to what the US deep state does in our name. This has been going on since before the Mexican American War, then Lincoln made the “federal” government into a platform for empire, and then Teddy Roosevelt established the US empire.

Sorry, Naser is alive an well.

Eternity awaits him and all like him who escape justice on this earth.

Everyone recognizes that the Jews are rabid. The best way to deal with them is a regional coalition armed with nukes that out mans and out guns them 10 to 1. So that the US stays out of it and the Jew problem gets corrected.

There will be no retaliation as Hezbollah, Iran and all Arabs are cowards.

I would not call Hezbollah cowards. Quite the contrary, just ask the IDF who invaded Lebanon and Hezbollah drove them back out.

I’ve asked you more than once to show us your Rambo plan so that we can laugh at it. But all you ever do is say what everyone is doing wrong without saying what they should be doing and how it would play out.

Men tend to fight back and not be used as a punching back.

Like I said, they’re killing 100 of the Jew’s Yinon plan regime change terrorists, including Mossad and IDF, for every Iranian that dies.

I will give you the benefit of the doubt as deep down you are a pretty decent human being and let’s see what happens in the next 6 months. I hope I am wrong, but don’t expect the Iranians or Hezbollah to fight back.

The Syrian government coalition, which includes Iran and Hezbollah, is killing the Jew’s Yinon plan regime change terrorists every day and has been for years.

You told me over 6 months ago that time was going to prove you right about the Russians. Instead it proved you wrong and reaffirmed what I told you at the time that you had it wrong.

How was I wrong, the Turkeys are still occupying Syria and now the Zionists are bombing Lebanon with impunity. Not a single Russian S-400 or even a firecracker has been fired. I hope I am wrong.

Your point at the time was that Syria was being partitioned and Russia was in the fix. That’s now obviously not happening. And even then I pointed out that despite the DMZ deconfliction agreement the Russians were hitting the terrorists every day.

Notions of honor, what’s more honorable than winning the war? All that you do is criticize the people who are winning the war. The Jews and their lackeys are losing the war. And hopefully getting the Jew problem solved is next on the agenda.

You must be kidding, who is winning, Syria is destroyed along with Iraq and Iran is on the verge of disintegration as the dumbass mullahs have played he last of the non-existent “nuclear program”. Why do think the Iranian cowards don’t retaliate? as Zionists kill them every day with impunity. Truth is harsh.

Russia is winning the war, as are the rest of the Syrian government coalition. Who were losing until Russia got involved and turned them from losers to winners. The Syrian government coalition are killing 100 of the Jew’s Yinon plan regime change terrorists, which I’m assuming includes Mossad and IDF, for every Iranian that dies.

Your optimism is great, but as old warhorse I don’t see any hope for Syria as Russia is in Jew pockets and will only support the Zionists. I am sorry to say that it is great humiliation even for a coward not to fight back. Just watch how the emboldened Zionists now attack Lebanon again and will bomb Yemen and eventually Iran. The repressed Iranian people will suffer more, perhaps they deserve it for being so cowardly.

It’s not optimism, it’s a 100 to 1 kill ratio as the Yinon plan terrorists die in mass. You’re ignoring it, I’m not.

For your sake I hope your optimism is well placed because you are decent person and mean well. I am not that hopeful though that the Zionists will ease up on their attacks. Humans only sadly understand strength. As an officer candidate a long time ago, I took a course THE MAN and history of warfare and violence for the sake of domination. Only the aggressive survive as the old SAS motto sums it up, WHO DARES WINS. Unless one fights back, then there is only more aggression.

Yah, I get it. That’s why so many terrorists have died and continue to die. You ignore it, I don’t. You don’t acknowledge the terrorists as being Jew puppets. I do.

Of course they are getting killed. ISIS is a JEW project as I have posted on various occasions. But this war will never end unless the Russians stop colluding with the Zionists and mongrel ErDOGAN.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/823f61b52941dd3b765a209bde8323ce1c12e91e9f2117ef43ef5793f175363b.jpg

The Russians have cleared 60% of Syria, soon to be 70%, and the NE is heading for collapse with the Iraqis cutting off the US. You’re ignoring that, I’m not.

Like I said, the Americunts and their Turkey and Kurd turd proxies control over 35% of Syria and they will be there in 6 months. Time will tell.

The momentum clearly isn’t in their favor. They’re losing Idlib and the NE is a lot shakier than it was before with the Iraqis turning on the Israelistan project.

I would say Zionist. It is the Zionist agenda to kill everyone else and take over the world, their chief aim to get the Christians and Muslims to kill each other.

I will again deconstruc your statment one point at a time. “Largely a FACTUAL statement, however one Zionist F-16I was downed by a fluke SA-2 strike a couple of years ago over the occupied Golan” 1. The missile witch shot down the F-16I was a SA-5 aka a S-200 2.It was not a fluke the aircraft entered in Syrian airspace and go shot down

“since then the Ruskie and Syrian supposed S-300 and 400 are being used as decoration pieces and flower pots and done fuckall at daily Zionist air strikes all across the region now”

well considering the fact that after the 2018 F16I incedent no IAF aircraft has ever entered Syrian airspace it seems the S-200 is doing a good job at dettering them let alone a S-300.

” As an old professional soldier raised with notions of honor, such collective cowardice is beyond belief.” that explaines your arrogance and close minded aggresive thinking and complete lach of knowlage of rules of ingaigment.

They didn’t have precision missiles in 06, now they do.

Being simple minded is no excuse for spreading BS.

What is simple minded and bs?

Richard, don’t take it personally but you are a mullah and Jew Putin fan boy for a cowardly lost cause. People who don’t fight for their rights tend to lose them. The Russian Jew Putin is playing the idiot Assad. Don’t get insulting but that is the sad truth, I wish it were otherwise. Iran is a shithole and the moron NasrAllah hides in a bunker and makes usual Arab style rosy speeches while Zionist hit Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Gaza and soon Yemen and Iran itself.

He means you are stupid and you write nonsense.

What stupidity and nonsense is that?

There are lot of naive cheerleaders here and they get upset if you tell them the TRUTH. The FACT is that the Iranians, Arabs and Hezbollah is all hot air, largely because they are corrupt, self serving and simply cowards. As I have said before the illiterate corrupt Iranian mullahs have destroyed the once potentiall Iranian economy and got Iran involved in zero sum Arab conflicts.

Blah blah “naive” conclusion from you before the war has even started. Your ‘other’ blindspot is that you cannot distinguish between Gulf Arabs and Levant Arabs. You just lump all ’em Arabs into your single rotten basket. For a supposed ‘wise old man’ that you claim you are, you certainly deduce like a silly over-caffeinated teenager.

He is mostly crazy.

You’re a liar. You’ve yet to disprove anything that I’ve written. You even run away from debating the issues with me because you know that you’l lose and make a fool out of yourself in the process.

You have a serious mental problem. I hope you are incarcerated in a psychiatric institution. Only a mentally disturbed person, like you, can write that the official news agency of Iran encourages pedophilia, and the former Iranian president is involved in pedophilia offenses against Iran’s children.

Copy and paste what I’ve written and try to disprove it. You can’t, so you won’t even try. You’ll just hide behind false accusations like the intellectual coward that you are.

He is mentally disturbed, that is why that troll is blocked by me.

France was more than happy to supply Jones with a ship sailed from France. This is interesting history. :)

The Bonhomme Richard. I was a retrofitted merchantman, but John Paul Jones was able to use it to take over the HMS Serapis in the battle that sent the Bonhomme Richard to the bottom.

Sadly , history is ignored in most nations, whether in be by intent or lack of interest by educators.

History of nations and their ever changing religious, political and military alliances are the prime reason that the military adventures of aggressive nations do not always go to plan.

I enjoy reading all opinions of history and somewhere in that melange of facts is the most probable truth.

The only hole you know about is your boyfriend’s.

Ahahahqhahahahahahahahahaha

Have you ever heard, I guess you have heard of film ‘Asshole patrol’?

alot of people didn’t know that i was surprised to learn it when i did we nearly traded one tyrant for the other thank goodness for Quincy Adams

You have to bear in mind Americans have not a clue what has been going on in the world. They know nothing of the IDF getting its ass kicked by Hezbollah the last time Israel invaded Lebanon. The talking heads focus American attention on queers and transgenders and welfare bums and movie stars and sports.

Absolutely, it has been hit over 300 times and now Zionists are bombing its headquarters in South Beirut and the rosy speech maker Nasrallah is hiding in a bunker.

Does 2006 ring a bell?

“Hezbollah… has acquired advanced Russian anti-aircraft weapons systems that were given by the Russian military to the Syrian armed forces …The SA-17 Buk missile battery is a game changer and will directly threaten Israeli aircraft operating in northern Israel and the region.”

– Hezbollah acquires advance Russian air-defense systems –

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/8/l-todd-wood-hezbollah-acquires-advance-russian-air/

“Syria has armed Hezbollah with it’s own advanced air defense missile systems, Pantsir S-1, which has been acquired by SAA from Russia and delivered to Lebanon.”

– The air defense systems possessed by Hezboullah party of Lebanon –

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/the-air-defense-systems-possessed-by-hezboullah-party-of-lebanon.538928/

Thanks for the information. So, in fact, the Israeli’s have been trying to stop Iranian missiles getting to Hezbollah! The BUK and the Pantsir work, but alone can be overwhelmed by low-cost rockets. I wonder what the Iranians have cooked up in the way of air defense … . This is getting high tech. Hezbollah is going to have to learn to operate radar and communications.

Hezbollah can operate the systems. But they shouldn’t have to carry the burden alone. Israel needs to be put in box to stop the Yinon plan machinations and attacks.

This includes staying out of Lebanese airspace, and stopping the attacks on it’s neighbors. Right now they have escalation dominance over any individual neighbor. They’ll lose that against a regional coalition that networks together.

The IAF isn’t going to challenge joint Turkish, Syrian, Russian air patrols over Lebanon. And once the Syrian war is won. The Syrian government coalition, SAA, SAF and SADF will be in a much stronger position to respond to Israeli attacks from a position of strength.

The Israelis will back off against Syria just like they avoid attacking Iran. Because the price of losing aircraft and precision missile strikes on their bases and infrastructure will be to high.

But it is still unwise to start the war with Israel, right now. Sometimes, it is better to lose your reputation or even some of your personnel, instead of loosing thousands of your people.

It depends on who they get into a war with. Syria has enough fire power to inflict equal damage on Israel. Hezbollah also can do a lot of damage. Iraq less so.

I agree that now isn’t a good time to go to to toe with the IDF. But another Golan smack down might be helpful.

Is it?

You can start with 2334, add the lack of a mutual defense pact, and go from there.

2334 was a political statement, not a statement of law, it has no legal effect

2334 is a UNSC resolution. Recognized as international law by the ICJ.

How did the ICJ manage that trick that would be in violation of the UN Charter and the ICJ’s own Charter

You haven’t disproven anything that I’ve written. Because you can’t. So you don’t even try. –

There’s no trick involved. They looked and the law and evidence and issued the ruling. I’ve already provided an expert opinion on the matter which you’ve yet to disprove. Because you can’t. Because you’re trying to bs your way around court decisions that disprove your contentions.

I have read your Wiki post, it mentions no ” expert opinion ” and names no “experts” . Which “court decisions ” are you referring to?

The Wiki article is supported by many footnotes that meet the evidence standard of expert opinion.

The UN Charter is much more of an expert

You haven’t quoted anything from the charter to support your claims. Because it doesn’t.

I gave you a reference to the entire Chapter VI and Chapter VII that govern SC resolutions. That you do not like that response would seem to be your personal problem

The ICJ has looked at 6 and 7 and doesn’t agree with you. Which is why they’ve issued decisions that don’t support your claims.

When did the do that? What “decision” do you continually refer to without any support from any facts? What Article of the UN Charter or the Court Charter gives the ICJ the legal authority to change the UN Charter?

I never said that they operated outside any charter. You’re the one who keeps alluding to it, not me. The ICJ issued the wall decision based in part on the charter, including 6 and 7. They know it inside out. Which is why they ruled against Israel on the wall, and agreed to allow Palestine to petition the court on Jerusalem: https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a5be7918ed26d49385870e03d36d0233d5ff3d8bb0f424eddcc05a1c6236a02e.png https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/176/176-20180928-PRE-01-00-EN.pdf

Ah, yes, the infamous “Wall OPINION” not “decision” That would be the one where the ICJ exceeded its authority and rewrote Article 51 of the Charter, openly said that “Palestine” is NOT a “state” and said that Israel should just shoot the “Palestinian” terrorists to protect its citizens rather than try to stop terrorist murderers. Many International Law experts called it “Ipsy dixit” rather than a legal opinion. PS: Ipsy dixit is a legal term mean, basically, because I said so, somewhat the same argument your mother probably used on you, rather than anything based on law. But that was a nice try.

Israel lost the case. And has never had the court’s findings overturned. They could have brought a case to assert their sovereignty over the Palestinian territory in question using your claims. Just like they could over the Golan. But they know that they would lose. So they don’t even try.

The court said that Israel was encroaching on occupied Palestinian territory and that the UN and it’s members are within the law to do what needs to be done to correct the problem.

The Court didn’t return a “finding” it issued an “opinion” and that opinion has been debunked by numerous legal institutions and experts

The ICJ used the term finding in the ruling. So yes, it is a finding. And one that can legally be used by UN members as part of resolution enforcement operations

I can cite dissenting opinions all day long, including from some ICJ members, as I illustrated in my quote from the ruling.

It doesn’t change the fact that the ruling went against the vermin Jew baby rapers, that it is based in international law, and that it adds to international case law against Israel.

The ICJ used the term “Advisory Opinion” which in legal terms is neither a “finding” or a “ruling” it is just an “opinion” that has been debunked by numerous legal experts and law schools. They, without authority, rewrote the UN Charter nd other International Laws, based their OPINION on UN nonbinding resolutions rather than on International Law. The OPINION is only useful as a propaganda tool, NOT as a basis for LAW

Your dissenting opinion doesn’t change the court’s ruling which has never been overturned. Neither the Israeli government nor any UN member, the SC or GA have even tried to overturn it based on your objections. Almost all of whom agree with this case law and the method used to issue it.

Is that the same UN (SC and GA) whose entire population of 193 states agreed thet Israel extended from the River to the Sea when they signed the Charter?

Your misinterpetation of the UN Charter is well known. The baby rapers have argued you faulty arguments for Israel’s entire existence and consistently lost.

Article 80

So what’s your point? The Brits turned the mandate back to the UN without having transfered any of their interest to the Jews.

Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel (Hebrew: הכרזה על הקמת מדינת ישראל‎), was proclaimed on 14 May 1948, the British planned to dissolve their association with the Mandate August 1, 1948. I’d say Israel beat them to the punch.

The mandate was extinguished by the UK. The partition resolution failed. And Israel was admitted as a mandate rump state west of the green line. With the Arabs administering the currently occupied territories east of the green line. The baby rapers never had control beyond the green line from their admission to the UN until the 67 invasion. No one besides Israel has ever recognized that invasion as conferring sovereignty to Israel.

Exactly what in the charter that you keep referring to do you mistakingly think gives Israel sovereignty in the occupied territories?

Israel “extinguished” British control when it issued it declaration, but the Mandate, with its borders was included in the UN Charter along with many others. The Charter is still with us. As for the Green Line, read the Armistice Agreements.

Your bulls— is laughable. No competant attorney agrees with this nonsense. The UK government canceled the mandate. It was issued to the UK, not Israel, Israel didn’t exist when it was issued to the UK. It wasn’t Israel’s to cancel. It was turned over to the UN to sort out. At that point the UN was the successor to the UK’s interest, not Israel.

The UK never transfered it’s interest to the Jews. The Jews were given the opportunity to try to get something in place that the UK could transfer it’s interest to. And the Jews subverted the Balfour Declaration, San Remo Resolution and attempts to implement them from day one. They never intended to comply with them. Which is why the Brits never gave them anything transfering the mandate’s sovereignty to them.

Exactly what in the armistice agreement do you think confers sovereignty to Israel east of the green line?

Any ” competant [sic] attorney” would tell you that did not have the legal authority to ” cancel ” the Mandate

Specifically, when did the ICJ call their opinion a “finding”?

“The Court began by finding that the General Assembly, which had requested the advisory opinion, was authorized to do so under Article 96, paragraph 1, of the Charter.”

– Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory –

https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/131

You, nor they have ever stated how the land of Israel, under international law, magically became “Palestinian Territories”

That’s not true. The UN has determined for decades by many resolutions that anything beyond the 67 borders is Palestinian territory. As reaffirmed by ICRC and ICJ decisions.

Your failed arguments to the contrary have been considered and consistently rejected.

Resolutions, by the Charter ARE NOT law. PS: The ICRC can not make law.

What part of the charter is that?

A questionable statement of jurisdiction is NOT a “finding” (ruling) of law. You are correct, You are not my law professor, you know nothing about law

I wouldn’t say that it’s questionable when almost every judge on the court agrees with it. As does the SC, GA & almost every UN member.

You’re obviously incorrect that the court didn’t find that it had jurisdiction. It’s right in the disposition.

The baby rapers submitted a 246 page brief that challenged the court’s jurisdiction, among other things. And they lost. As anyone using your failed arguments has over and over again.

“SC, GA & almost every UN member.” completely ignores it

Ignores what?

The international community, ICJ and UNSC have already decided that your Jewish arguments about the mandate and article 80 lack validity:

“At present, based on the result of numerous UN resolutions that cite Article 49 of the Geneva Convention, the consensus view of the international community is that Israeli settlements are illegal and constitute a violation of international law.[9][10][11][l][m] According to the BBC, every government in the world, except Israel, considers the settlements to be illegal.”

– International law and Israeli settlements –

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law_and_Israeli_settlements#International_legal_opinions

– Territories — Legality of Jewish Settlements –

https://www.mythsandfacts.org/replyonlineedition/chapter-9.html

–

“The international community, ICJ and UNSC have already decided” that the UN Charter lacks “validity”? That’s interesting.

No, they’ve decided that your arguments lack validity. And that their interpretation of the charter and international law is different than yours and that it supports the Palestinians not the Jews. All of your arguments have been rejected by the ICJ and the UNSC.

My “arguments”are a;; based on the words of the Charter. I keep asking you for the specific ICJ and UNSC “rejection” and as yet, you have refused/ been unable to provide any instance of such.

You’re making a false allegation. 2334 rejects your claims that the occupied territories belong to Israel. I quoted the exact passage. As does the ICJ decision on the wall:

“In its Opinion, the Court finds unanimously that it has jurisdiction to give the advisory opinion requested by the United Nations General Assembly and decides by 14 votes to 1 to comply with that request.

The Court responds to the question as follows:

“A. By 14 votes to 1,

The construction of the wall being built by Israel, the occupying Power, in the occupied Palestinian territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, and its associated regime, are contrary to international law”;

“B. By 14 votes to 1,

Israel is under an obligation to terminate its breaches of international law; it is under an obligation to cease forthwith the works of construction of the wall being built in the occupied Palestinian territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, to dismantle forthwith the structure therein situated, and to repeal or render ineffective forthwith all legislative and regulatory acts relating thereto, in accordance with paragraph 151 of this Opinion”;

“C. By 14 votes to 1,

Israel is under an obligation to make reparation for all damage caused by the construction of the wall in the occupied Palestinian territory, including in and around East Jerusalem”;

“D. By 13 votes to 2,

All States are under an obligation not to recognize the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by such construction; all States parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949 have in addition the obligation, while respecting the United Nations Charter and international law, to ensure compliance by Israel with international humanitarian law as embodied in that Convention”;

“E. By 14 votes to 1,

The United Nations, and especially the General Assembly and the Security Council, should consider what further action is required to bring to an end the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and the associated regime, taking due account of the present Advisory Opinion.”

– INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE ADVISORY OPINION FINDS ISRAEL’S CONSTRUCTION OF WALL ‘CONTRARY TO INTERNATIONAL LAW’ –

https://www.un.org/press/en/2004/icj616.doc.htm

The UNGA recognises Palestine as a state by resolution within the 67 borders. As does the ICJ which is hearing a case brought by Palestine on Jerusalem. The ICJ only hears cases by nations with governments and borders.

Idiot, read that Wall Opinion again, you will see that you are (again) wrong. The ICJ only considered the question based on a request from the GA and clearly stated that “Palestine” is NOT a state

They stated that occupied Palestinian territories are not part of Israel. And that Israel is illegally encroaching on them. Which refutes your claim that they’re part of Israel.

Numerous Legal institutions and law schools disagree with their and your opinion. The Mandate disagrees with your opinion. The UN Charter Article 80 disagrees with your opinion. The peace treaty with Egypt disagrees with your opinion. The Peace treaty with Jordan disagrees with your opinion. The fact that there are no treaties demarking borders of “Palestine” disagrees with your opinion. UNSC 242 disagrees with your opinion. AND the “Palestinians” themselves disagree with your opinion when they talk about a “future” state. Suck it up, you are wrong.

You haven’t disproven anything that I’ve written. The ICJ, UNSC, UNGA, ICRC, and the vast majority of UN members all disagree with your claims. And the compilation of all of these decisions constitute the international law the evil blood sucking Jew baby rapers are in chronic violation of and have been for Israel’s entire criminal history. Those are the facts.

” evil blood sucking Jew baby rapers [sic]”? See your doctor, you need help. While you are in his waiting room you can read the report in “The European Journal of International Law Vol. 16 no.5 © EJIL 2006” to see them debunk the “Wall Opinion”. After you return to your meds, we can discus the rest of your rant.

The vermin Jew pedophile mass rape 1,000 children worldwide every week using Jew cannibal prostitutes with their vile blood sucking felony oral copulation with a minor Jewish “circumcision” statutory rape ritual. Taking their virginity and infecting some of them with venereal disease, brain damaging and murdering them.

Judaism should be outlawed and the planet dejudified so that it is Jew free. A UN convention should be passed and ratified abolishing Judaism like was done with slavery.

Who do you hate more, Jews or yourself?

You’re the one shilling for an evil pedophile cult that felony mass rapes 1,000 children worldwide every week.

The only “evil pedophile cult” is Islam

That’s an obvious lie. The Jews are the ones ritually raping 1,000 children every week, not the Muslims.

Ask Europe about their Muslim “migrants”

So they have criminals. The Jews are the ones practicing ritual pedophile rape.

“pedophile” like marrying a six year old?

She was 19, not 6 according to reports. That’s one questionable case from 1,300 years ago. The Jews are the ones indisputably ritually raping 1,000 children every week. Judaism needs to be outlawed, the synagogues and yeshivas closed and former Jews assimilated into a Jew free society so that Jews go extinct.

Islam’s Qurán disagrees with you. Are you saying the Qurán is a lie?

I don’t know one way or another. But it doesn’t matter. The Jews are the vile blood sucking pedophile mass rapists.

Finally, some truth from you, you “don’t know one way or another.”

Anyone shilling for a pedophile mass rape cult like you are has some serious mental issues.

None of my Prophets married a 6 year old

There’s no verifiable proof that that’s even true. And it has nothing to do with your evil cult raping 1,000 children every week. Which is verifiable.

https://worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/palestinian-european-jew.png?w=660

What you are saying is that European Jews unwanted in Europe could claim to be the Israelite returning home and arrive by the thousands and then they have the UN on their side making a ruling that Palestine must be partitioned for the Palestinians and for the alien European Jews. The alien Jews numbering 650,000 were given 56.6% of Palestine and the indigenous Palestinians – Muslims and Christians – who were twice as many at 1,300,000, were given 44.4%. Who in their right mind would think the indigenous people would find it acceptable. And what is so strange is that the Europe Jew is completely alien to the Middle East. The European Jew never ever was in Palestine until he came as a Zionist in 1882.

https://worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/major-res-etai-pinkas-and-captain-res-yoav-arad-pinkas1.png?w=620

Before international law, 650,000 European Jews entered Palestine. Who allowed them to enter Palestine? Were the indigenous people consulted? The European Jew had made up his mind when the British came in power in Palestine that he was going to go grab Palestine with the blessing of the British. The European Jew is as alien to our region as the Chinese or the Japanese or the Eskimos. We do not know the European Jew and the European Jew does not know us. How then did these goddamned aliens who used to speak Yiddish and cook gefiltah fish wind up stealing Palestine?

https://worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/european-jew-vs.arab_.png

On what F-ING basis is the white man known as the Ashkenazi in the Middle East? Is the white man related to us?

The other site is blocking my comments. Like this:

RichardD charliematerne 15 hours ago Pending It’s pretty clear to me from the circumstances and the wording that 2334 was intended to be both binding and enforceable. And that it was passed in a manner and using appropriate procedures that make it international law. Here are two qualified and competent expert opinions that support this:

“Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali related that during a press conference his remarks about a “non-binding” resolution started a dispute. His assistant released a hasty clarification, which only made the situation worse. It said that the Secretary had only meant to say that Chapter VI contains no means of ensuring compliance and that resolutions adopted under its terms are not enforceable. When the Secretary finally submitted the question to the UN Legal Advisor, the response was a long memo the bottom line of which read, in capital letters: “NO SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CAN BE DESCRIBED AS UNENFORCEABLE.” The Secretary said, “I got the message.”[17] …

Former President of the International Court of Justice Rosalyn Higgins argues that the location of Article 25, outside of Chapter VI and VII and with no reference to either, suggests its application is not limited to Chapter VII decisions.[23] She asserts that the Travaux préparatoires to the UN Charter “provide some evidence that Article 25 was not intended to be limited to Chapter VII, or inapplicable to Chapter VI.”[24] She argues that early state practice into what resolutions UN members considered binding has been somewhat ambiguous, but seems to “rely not upon whether they are to be regarded as “Chapter VI or “Chapter VII” resolutions […] but upon whether the parties intended them to be “decisions” or “recommendations” … One is left with the view that in certain limited, and perhaps rare, cases a binding decision may be taken under Chapter VI”.[25] She supports the view of the ICJ that “clearly regarded Chapters VI, VII, VIII and XII as lex specialis while Article 24 contained the lex generalis … [and] that resolutions validly adopted under Article 24 were binding on the membership as a whole”.[26]”

– Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter –

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapter_VI_of_the_United_Nations_Charter

UNSC 2334 “9. Urges in this regard “, please note that the use of the word “URGES” makes it a request, not a command. How does anyone enforce a request? Also not the reference to UNSC 242 and 338 which clearly state that Israel is legally in possession of the so called “West Bank”

The resolution obviously disagrees with your erroneous interpretation of preceeding resolutions:

“1. Reaffirms that the establishment by Israel of settlements in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law”

Urges means that it authorities the implementation of 2334’s provisions by member nations. As do subsequent resolutions, such as the one on a Palestinian protection force. As elaborated on in the Secretary General’s report.

And, specifically, what International Law allows the UN, or anyone else to partition what legally belongs to one state to create another? . Specifically, what created the so-called “Palestinian territories”? What is the legal precedent for the creation of such territories? Where are the minimum of 5 treaties that would be required to create the “Palestinian territories”?

The powers invested in the UN as a supranational treaty organization that Israel belongs to contained in it’s charter provide it the legal authority to make determinations on questions of nationhood. And the UNSC, UNGA and ICJ have all determined that Palestine within the 67 borders isn’t Israeli territory and belongs to the Palestinians.

Such as 2334 that I’ve quoted, the ICJ wall decision that I’ve quoted, the UNGA resolution granting Palestine observer status, and the ICJ decision granting Palestine litigation status.

When and under which Charter Articles did any of those determinations become law?

When among others they meet ICJ statute 38 which they do.

“Article 38 1. The Court, whose function is to decide in accordance with international law such disputes as are submitted to it, shall apply:

international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting states;

international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law;

the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;

subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the various nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law.”

– STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE –

https://www.icj-cij.org/en/statute

Was that supposed to answer my question? It didn’t

It answered it concisely. Your rejection of it shows that you’re a truth hater.

My question was “When and under which Charter Articles did any of those determinations become law?” You have not answered that question

Under the charter provisions creating and governing the ICJ and ICJ statute. Such as ICJ Statute 38 that I quoted word for word. Which determines what comprises international law. You can’t get any more specific than that. Your deficiencies in understanding jurisprudence isn’t my fault. I’m not your law professor.

UN Charter idiot

You are wasting my time with your ignorance, lies and stupidity. I just gave you the chapter and paragraph.

Where you raped as a child by a blood sucking cannibal Jew prostitute who infected you with venereal disease and brain damaged you?

Here it is word for word.

“Charter of the United Nations Chapter XIV — The International Court of Justice Article 96 “1. The General Assembly or the Security Council may request the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on any legal question.

2. Other organs of the United Nations and specialized agencies, which may at any time be so authorized by the General Assembly, may also request advisory opinions of the Court on legal questions arising within the scope of their activities.””

http://legal.un.org/repertory/art96.shtml

An “advisory opinion ” that you have somehow managed to twist in your demented mind into a “law”. No nation would accept that “opinion” as law

It’s case law. And nations obviously recognize it by among other things not moving their embassies to Jerusalem. Which is another case that Israel will probably lose.

The ICJ ignored its own previous RULINGS (actual case law) in producing its Kangaroo Court opinion. That opinion clearly states that no nation can claim Self-Defense under the UN Charter of any other International Law against ” non-state organizations” such as ISIS or Boko Haram or AQAP, a situation NO nation will follow. It has been declared an Ipsy Dixit opinion. It was dead on arrival and it is still dead, give it up and let’s discuss something relevant

You’re talking out of both sides of your mouth. Saying that the ICJ can and can’t produce case law. When obviously it can.

Provide the quote saying that a nation can’t defend itself against non state actors. You’re misrepresenting what the ruling says.

No, you are simply reading through your ears, not your eyes. I have repeatedly stated that “Opinions” are NOT “Rulings” Opinions carry no weight From the Opinion: “139. Under the terms of Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations:

Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security.

Article 51 of the Charter thus recognizes the existence of an inherent right of self-defence in the case of armed attack by one State against another State. However, Israel does not claim that the attacks against it are imputable to a foreign State. The Court also notes that Israel exercises control in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and that, as Israel itself states, the threat which it regards as justifying the construction of the wall originates within, and not outside, that territory. The situation is thus different from that contemplated by Security Council resolutions 1368 (2001) and 1373 (2001), and therefore Israel could not in any event invoke those resolutions in support of its claim to be exercising a right of self-defence. Consequently, the Court concludes that Article 51 of the Charter has no relevance in this case.”

The ICJ, without and legal authority rewrote that article by adding the qualification that attacks on a member must be made by a state to invoke Article 51. It is clearly saying that no state (as the US responded to 911,an attack by a non-state actor within territory it controls) has any right (responsibility) to protect its citizens from “non-state actors”. It also uses the (political, not legal term ) ” Occupied Palestinian Territory” a term with no basis in law or fact. That is why every state member ignores the opinion.