Navalny Poisoning Is A Great Scam. New Data Unveiled

He has rabbit too….only his heart can answer which one is closer..

You are the closest, my dear rabit. The dog above I keep only to sell his pupies. Now jump on my finger.

Wow, thanks for posting about your kids in this rant then immediately expressing your fantasy how I finger an animal. If I was from child protection that would give me heads up.

Thanks for supporting my side. I will use your wize words if you din’t mind.

No problem, I don’t mind. I copied those words from this book, you might not agree with his politics. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d69b051cb00aaf18cc6149b51d6f708d3b91880e876a944ed3516a433b25db21.jpg

Thanks, most likely I wouldn’t but I agree with the specific quote.

The name and label has been tainted by a sea of lies for nearly a century.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d1f681f9cae3bcdf17cda3d13e2626570918b4189ce038537ca19cadecc0e62e.png

The name and label has been tainted by a sea of lies for almost a century.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d1f681f9cae3bcdf17cda3d13e2626570918b4189ce038537ca19cadecc0e62e.png

How is the relation between the individual and the authority in fascism? :)

The individual has free reign over their pursuits in life, as long as they do not conflict with the health of the nation and its people. Generally they must conform to the culture, though freedom of religion is permitted. There are a set of moral obligations that each individual must uphold and those come before individual rights, their duties to their families, people and nation are consistent with traditional European values. Blood and soil so to speak, and opposition to materialism.

Citizens can own private property, start a business and sell goods and services. The government steps in as a regulator, or when the business interferes with the established moral order. State oversight extends protection to employees and acts as a sort of mediator or worker’s union between employees and employers, otherwise non-governmental unions that exist today are abolished.

Some links on the subject + explanations of Fascist economics:

CT: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/65ztOo4t23NB/ https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/100360657-cultured-thug

Fascist Philosophy: https://archive.org/details/thephilosophyoffascism_20191022 * By “collective ownership” he’s referring to profit sharing (trading a portion of your wage or salary in exchange for purchasing stocks in the company), otherwise they reject market speculation (stock market) and organizations such as the IMF, BIS, WTO, World Bank, and Federal Reserve.

Towards a True Economic Third-Position: http://www.traditionalright.com/towards-a-true-economic-third-position/ Video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/joLHUWR7NUTj/

Ironsides: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/phoenix_ironsides/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvYywRiRiyg

https://soundcloud.com/user-748364735

Personally I believe the state power shoyld be continuously minimized, but not abruptly. State = power = corruption.

Well that would be fine and all, however in my opinion the masses that form the body of greater organism (the nation) can become collectively unintelligent and susceptible to a crowd mentality. People are largely shaped by their surroundings , the capitalist society of the past 60-70 years places profit above all else and feeds on people’s most base desires in order to generate as much profit as possible to the detriment to people’s health. They are conditioned to go for that low hanging fruit instead and being the lowest versions of themselves instead of aiming to attain the furthest depths of their potential.

In my opinion the man is not made by nature to rule over the masses there are very few exceptions of iluminate dictators. I represent the masses, I can’t sympatize with my opressor even if it was better for myself. I value what nature gave me more than what another man can give me by supressing my rights. IMO the conscience of people can rize from slave level to free men simply by being armed with fire arms.

Democracy appeals to the lowest common denominator and a spiraling descent into mediocrity. My vote is worth the same value as the vote of a prostitute, a propagandist, a Antifa or BLM terrorist, a criminal, or illegal migrant. Sex offenders and serial killers are each allowed to vote and their vote is worth just as much as my own.

Democracy has always been governed by corporate-financial interests of an oligarchy or a plutocratic elite, your rights are walked over regardless of whether or not they are democratic. Some democracies are freer than others and are always susceptible to subversion.

Since “natural rights” are a man-made construct, freedom cannot exist without the state; otherwise the iron law of nature takes over. It becomes a question of “might is right”, a state of complete anarchy determined by survival of the fittest.

By ensuring the unity of one’s own group of people, their rights, prosperity and very survival can be guaranteed.

What If Liberalism Is the Problem? https://www.bitchute.com/video/WfdaJYr7MNmN/ http://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-limitations-of-sargon-of-akkads.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWh3l9qF_F4

I agree that the actual system is flawed but a system that openly gives god-like power to a man is even worse. I think dictature also apeals to the lowest as they don’t care who is in power or how much the psycho (because that’s what power makes from man) cares about him as long as his neighbour suffer the same fate. Those who want to be rulled by a dictator are partly masochistic partly irresponsible.

Democracy is dictatorship by financial forces who rig the vote by gaining control over all political parties, there is no grass roots process involved and everyone is divided. The best funded and most promoted candidate always wins the election. The leading politician doesn’t have god-like power under Fascism, there is a Fascist council that overseas his actions and can vote him out of power, unlike in National Socialist Germany. There is a lot of information not well known exposing lies contained within the mainstream about the Second World War and the holohoax. https://www.bitchute.com/video/x5DATBwmEmHZ/

How is freedom of press in fascism?

There is federal oversight over the press. For instance they couldn’t spread gossip or do what the jewish Communists had done in America and Europe, particularly since the 1950s and the watershed moment of white downward spiral from the world wars and the 1960s onwards.

I wouldn’t trust such oversight more than the jews, the more powerful is the state, the greater are the lies.

It goes without saying that is a reasonable concern. Civilization goes through phases of birth and decay. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsaieZt5vjk

Healthy sexuality would be enforced, no LGBT and pornography greatly limited.

I’m afraid they woud not stop there, pornography is mostly on the internet, they should hardly censure the internet to acomplish that

Criticism of the ruling authority is allowed under Fascism. You mention the more powerful the state, the greater the lies. Corporate and banker oligarchy can still happen with less government, they control the governments of the west and not the other way around. They still had more power than these governments did in the first half of the 20th century, WW1 destroyed the last true monarchies in Europe. I don’t agree with monarchism either, I would prefer a system of meritocracy which rarely exists in the world today.

Meritocracy is when someone decides who really has merits and this is the utopia of a dictatorship, they always chose their friends and relatives, not only the dictator himself but the entire state aparatus.

Personally I disbelief current banking and corporate system would survive without being protected by the state. IMO the state is a trojan horse for the corporation dictatirship to destroy small business and enfirce corporate products and rules on the market.

Fascism doesn’t envisage a utopia, it views life being in constant flux which is more realistic. I think it depends a lot on the people themselves, the culture and the society. If you look at 2nd and 3rd world countries there is generally more nepotism than you will find in Europe or America due to the differences in cultural values. Even on its own, India for instance is more hierarchical and more run-down than many of the east Asian countries.

I don’t think there are any rules organic to the free market other than supply and demand, regulations put in place decide rules set in place. I think there should at least be some form of government, clearly there are people who are more competent than others.

I think in terms of meritocracy when applied to the government should have stricter requirements where they should possess noble character, this can be done by some form of grass roots democracy or some alternative method. People should aim to be pillars of the community, healthy forms of competition permitted.

By democracy I am referring to leadership not being decided on one’s social class or level of income, for almost as long as modern democracy has been around since the American revolution, winning candidates have almost always been the best financed and highly promoted by media and manufacturers.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/07e6a037d563f6fd92916d3530e6fd8e71ece8e36e9f9fab066e2af1f10f1750.jpg

Sounds good, why would that be called fascism? Let’s call it something new :)

An alternative name is the “Third Way”, “Third Position”, or Integralism—a Brazilian Fascist party founded by Plínio Salgado. He got overthrown shortly after taking public office.

“The Fascist State does not wish to be a State imposed upon the citizen, rather it wishes to be a State which invests the citizen and informs his conscience. In order to actually shape his consciousness, the State sustains and educates that consciousness; the State recognizes and acknowledges the citizen, to treat him both as what he is and what he should be, historically, economically, and politically, with all the fundamental interests that shape him and distinguish him from all others. The Fascist State, in order to penetrate and direct the consciousness of its citizens, wishes to organize them in national unity; a unity possessed of a soul. That unity would manifest itself as a unitary being, possessed of powerful will, and conscious of its own ends.” – Giovanni Gentile

Sorry, you can keep saying the positive intentions of the state towards the citizens. I just don’t teust the authority. I believe the government shoukd be afraid of the citizens so they keep their promisses. For this the citizens need to be armed and have militias of volunteers that could police the government.

You make a compelling argument.

The National Socialist German Worker’s Party reduced gun restrictions from the Weimar period, though civilian ownership of firearms don’t outmatch the police and national armies. As you stated, you prefer armed militias administered by volunteers. And for the political process to become more grassroots, as opposed to a centralized system.

As a side note: In Germany, the only legal party (NSDAP – Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) enjoyed widespread public support; in Italy, the only legal party (PNF – Partito Nazionale Fascista) turned on itself in 1943 with mass public demonstrations against the party and the Fascist council supported by the Italian king (Victor Emmanuel III) ordered the arrest and imprisonment of Mussolini.

Yes back then dictatorship was seen as a progress, by the masses. Now we have enough examples that it fails every time.

“though civilian ownership of firearms don’t outmatch the police and national armies”

Please allow me to remind you how revolutions happen: most of the army refuse to follow dictator’s orders and butcher the civs.

In order for that to happen you need a determined resitance to occupy positions and pledge to fight to the end. In case some high rank gives the order to crush them he needs to think twice as the soldiers may refuse the orders or he can get a bullet in his back from some rank that has relatives on the other side.

But if the population is scared chiken they flee when they hear shots in the air and that’s why all governments want a disarmed population.

I remember the Romanian army refused to fire upon rioting miners, this lended enormous assistance towards an armed takeover of the Romanian Communist government in 1989.

https://ww2truth.com/2019/06/18/the-german-master-race-myth/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHLvr1hW20Y

Yes, also in Russia anti Yeltzin coup. That’s the logic of the USA’s second amendment.

From what I know fascism was mostly demonized by Stalin to prevent a bad light to the word ‘socialism’. So he ordered to not mention national-socialism. But I think fascism and socialism have many things in common.

There is socialism in Fascism, but it’s a different kind of socialism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-ARQ-HUvFg

I think the revival of the european civilization should be grassroots, if a grassroot movement in EU will come to conclusion that there is no way to contain the government corruption and betryal but having heavy armed militias, I will join them.

Whichever way it occurs, I think of history as more of a circular pattern than a linear one. When it comes to Darwinism, I think the human species has undergone a bit of a devolution than a process of Orthogenesis (progressive evolution). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsaieZt5vjk

Interesting, some might blame the jews for the involution of european culture but how about the persians or aryans from India, which were also caucazians? I’m not 100% sure but I think Herodot bashed persians for their multiculturalism and predicted their fall.

I’m not as familiar with Greek and Roman writers as I should be. A century ago, students 17-18, or adults in their early-mid 20s could recite passages from the Illiad by memory.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/69ddb2d5552ee858f844699b2865d3690af9b198c08ed6e16b94582899b3c907.png

Yes, my father can

Grassroots is an ideal way to go about it, I don’t know if it’s a realistic option. I think human nature in its current state is not wise enough on average to deal with the current crisis, the media and school system largely influence the mindsets of the people. Ethnic demographics also play a huge role. In my opinion, it would initially be a more centralized process to implement the changes needed before a more ideal change can occur, perhaps in a matter of decades or a century.

I still think grass roots politics remains highly important, the anti-white propaganda is annoying. Europe for instance is something like 90% white or higher, and yet non-whites are vastly over represented in the media. It’s a psychological warfare campaign followed up with demographic replacement and the black washing of history.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRUJk74jQvQ

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c77a3c6ed3ca93ca5576045a5e4ae6ae638de675ea8b26b5e903415f1879e896.png

Regarding ethnic demographics, how do you see the future of EU?

This is a bit unrelated, this account does visual comparisons of old architecture compared to newer ones:

https://twitter.com/Western_Trad/status/1301893951981596673

Not so unrelated, and not only architecture, everything else. All things have two effects, one positive and one negative. The negative effect of the information spreading among the masses is that many can’t process it so anything new can be called ‘progress’ or ‘beautiful’.

I think politicians, billionaires and university professors are very particular about what they want the masses to think is “progress”.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRfT_ONmelE

I look at these people and I think that some trybes looked in the antiquity, full of piercings and tattoos. Or some African tribes. Also homosexuality and paedophilia were norm especially in the upper class. Also today there are still large communities in Indonezia and Afghanistan where young boys are given by their parents to paedophile ‘teachers’ to learn belly dancing and seduction art. The globalists have us turn back 2k years ago and make this normal.

Homosexuality and pederasty among the upper class, or any class, is a result of cultural decline. The behaviour and quality of the ruling class always has a trickle down effect upon society. The European “barbatus” or “barbarian”, among others used tattoos and piercings for cultural reasons, rather than a result of fashion. Alternatively women may wear earrings when fashionable, the Japanese used to humiliate dangerous criminals when caught by etching tattoos onto their foreheads, or other parts of their bodies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnCp-T_-fHA

Dostoyevsky on the jews: http://www.bitchute.com/embed/LtpCxr3icOtZ/

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0972bff38c832462bb2841e3f65fa0e4fa0e57b890489ef3ed606d2e53736c35.png

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e78fba2bb7288fdda0a1f4703d710ce7dc7ca1bd228ade03dbbe74ce93a61da1.png

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOD-LhGD42Q

Thanks, I have a lot to watch. Btw first video doesn’t load for me. I didn’t know about this platform.

Interesting video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/VbyVxslV31Yc/ — Brian Ruhe is odd, but he hosts some neat interviews. The video is about Mein Kampf, Chapter XIV: Eastern Policy.

Communism imposes itself on the individual, unlike Fascism and NS.

Communism is a system the Jews use against non-Jews. It’s a system created by Jews, for Jews, to reduce non-Jews to a cattle class whose sole purpose is to provide for and serve the Jewish people.

“The Fascist State does not wish to be a State imposed upon the citizen, rather it wishes to be a State which invests the citizen and informs his conscience.” sorry but something like that was the Communism too, I just can’t trust humans that have too much power over others.

Yes, I think the Bolshevik leaders wished harm on the population. It makes sense to be wary of big government, at the same time it makes sense to be wary of big business forming private security companies and abusing others, or dominating the market place. This could happen under an Anarcho Capitalism.

It’s true that Bolseviks wanted to harm the population but later most communist countries got rid of their jewish elites still the government continue to harm the population repeating the propaganda that the state wants to empower the people. So it’s about the dictatorship and corruptuon. Humans should not be trusted with too much power in their hands.

I think the jews set the precedent for the harm being done, they still served jewish interests after many jews were removed from the top echelons of the poliburo. The shift from Communism to democratic capitalism reasserted jewish power in Russia.

I observed that some ‘advanced’ nations have this bad habits to educate ALL their children to dream to work too hard, to become doctors, engineers, astronoms, etc while other to have a shop, a butique, to sell something and the first categoey almost always end serving the second. That’s what happened in Russia too.

Yes our economies have outsourced most heavy industry to China in favor of a service economy.

I meant the jews, muslims, mugrants children in general tend to dream to be sellers, to trade, while others, like Russians dream to be soldiers, ingineers, that’s why the second category will serve the firtst. Even Chinese are better traders than Europeans.

Plato said something similar:

“For it would be absurd if someone should think that spiritedness does not occur in our cities from private citizens, who indeed have this reputation, such as those who live throughout Thrace and Scythia and nearly all the northern areas, or love of learning, which indeed someone would say is especially prevalent in the area around us, or as someone would say that the love of money is not least among the Phoenicians or Egyptians.” — Plato’s Republic, 435e3-436a3.

Thank you for the quote. I knew from somewhere that ancient greeks blamed phoenicians for their only taste for trade but was not sure. Now I know more precise.

In a Third Positionist system, it is enforced by law that merchants and entire upper class are meant to serve the interests of the nation and its people. It promotes and enforces a national synthesis of all social economic classes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HL_e43wVbqw

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/13e5cb03e77a445d1d6fb7c0c2e6d52dd01ef7514b7f178a7f5475a041c434ff.jpg

But for the jews, the accumulation of capital is only a means to an end. Mercantilism and swindling people is heavily intertwined with their religion. The superstitious thinking of their religious class is more bizarre than anyone else’s.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/dAxpA8oDvKqm/ https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f8e43cb1cf7a86dd67a0d6afe34364874553dc80c00dff6c17a1c6e24f20e7ad.png

I removed the other pictures, these quotes better articulate my point about freedom of the press. Russia now has a law prohibiting “fake” news, obviously it is up to them to decide what is “fake” and what is now; therein lies the danger in irresponsible hands. I do think there would be less abuse of power if white people ruled their own countries instead of being ruled by jews, even under a Fascist system. That sort of system would have the potential to fix all of the problems that cannot be fixed in the current political framework, unless major changes are made.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d044d3fb8a1c4a16cdf4b488cc09c64104a789f646800121f0d72cc928ce6405.png

I see nationalism good only when it comes dirrectly as manifestation of the people, like a revolution or a boycot, but not when enforced by a dictatureship as they would primarily asure their own good before the people, that always lead to national disaster. Speaking of the jews, they are the strongest nationalists and they never had a dictature of their own.

The jews had dictators in ancient times, otherwise they mainly listened to their rabbinical authorities until the 1800s. There were also jewish Communist dictators in Hungary and the Soviet Union.

The ghettos originated as a method of separation between jews and gentiles, enforced under jewish law. They segregated to avoid becoming assimilated with gentiles, they do however marry in with gentiles, historically as a means of infiltration into the non-jewish hierarchies of whatever host nation they reside in.

The purpose of intermarriage is two-fold: gaining influence (this initially involved marrying into the aristocracy) and eugenics (a reduction of inbreeding). They can marry for other reasons and are allowed to leave their religious communities, inter-marriage and miscegenation helps to hide their jewish facial features.

https://archive.org/details/DouglasReedTheControversyOfZion/page/n73/mode/2up

[When the Roman ghetto was destroyed at Mussolini’s order in the early 1930’s the Jewish press (as Mr. Bernard J. Brown records) lamented the event in such words as these:

“One of the most unique phenomena of Jewish life in Goluth is gone. Where but a few months ago a vibrant Jewish life was pulsating, there now remains a few half-destroyed buildings as the last vestige of the quondam ghetto. It has fallen victim to the Fascist passion for beauty and under Mussolini’s order the ghetto has been razed…”.

The implication of this is that the razing of the ghetto was “Fascism”, just as the original creation of ghettoes (at Jewish demand) is presented as persecution by the Zionist historians of today.]

I meant the jews are nationalistic without needing an iron fist that lead them to nationalism. This is the type of nationalism that endures. The nationalism promoted by the governments is flawed as history showed already.

And since you mentioned Russia, they have around 100 billionaires from which 90 jews, 10 turcic. It’s a pure oligarchy masked in the form of fascism. Russia is the resource-richest country in the world and many are living in poverty. If you check their social media you’ll see more white trash than in USA.

Thanks for mentioning. I have seen parts of Russia on social media but have never been there, a lot of the white trash living there seem to be in their 50s or older, the younger generations move to larger cities for better work and education. Or to a different country entirely. Ideologically speaking, Russia appears more democratic than Fascistic and runs on a Keynesian economic model. It retains Marxist ideas that blend in with the western liberalism of the 1990s, the Enlightenment ideals of Classical Liberalism and the ideas of Critical Theory permeate the media of almost every country on earth.

I can agree with that

I want to see and experience a national, cultural and religious revival. This includes ethnic and racial consciousness, especially among Whites, and moving forth with those interests in mind which does not necessitate harming the group interests of everyone else as long as they do not conflict with the interests and well-being of my own group.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/XyqLUKl0sMHt/

“Anarchy is a reaction to the failures of democracy. It is based on the pacifistic Utopian belief that world peace is somehow possible by dissolving the state. It is another product of the Enlightenment. ”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xE4yMA7O7wY

I see fascism more like a dictature than a national ideal, something like Turkey. On short term dictatures are winners but in long term – losers.

That’s understandable, Turkey since removing their sultan is more of an oligarchy overseeing a republican governmental model, as with most countries. Compared to western democracies, Turkey is more like a banana republic with state power that is more centralized into the hands of the ruling party. This is still better than the theocratic monarchy they lived under.

Anarcho-Capitalism has never been put to the test, anarchic societies were not peaceful and were often under threat from stronger tribes. Even the French and American Revolutions were led and supported by members of the ruling class and rich land owners.

I don’t think there has ever been a political system run by the people, except in pre-historic or ancient times where tribes of similar background squabbled against each other in tribal warfare, or in brief periods of political strife before the new rulers took power. This was certainly still the case when ancient Rome invaded Gaul, Briton and the Balkans.

Places they didn’t manage to conquer like Germania would temporarily band together to combat Roman imperialism. Such a process could only materialize again if the world runs out of natural resources to run a modern industrialized world.

I would not titally exclude the state and the rich class, I just believe that people that reach the corage to reduce the state also reach the conscience to buy locally and oppose multinationals. Btw the fast growing China could change the logic of the globalism in the world as the West will need to oppenly adopt economic nationalism.

Poor little snowflake. Ridicule is fought with same, and you get triggered? The horror…

Thankfully I wasn’t triggered this time. Everyone develop as much self-control as humanly possible, I shall do the same.

Your source of article is from the gray zone of the Internet

Everything that is not US PROPAGANDA media you dicks call ” a gray zone” FUCK: CIA Nazi News

If you had oppened that shitty global research you have aids in your computer

What’s the source, globalresearch?

Go there and see for your fucking self you moron, link is provided!

But I don’t like stupid bligs with malwares

I advise to block and ignore him.

Bulgaria is delaying construction again and again. If Serbia wants to be a US slave, than Russia should stop giving anything for free. Im pretty sure about the 50% cap. https://www.google.com/search?q=The+EU+has+put+a+cap+on+North+stream+2+gas+flow+by+50%25.&oq=The+EU+has+put+a+cap+on+North+stream+2+gas+flow+by+50%25.&aqs=chrome..69i57.1694j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

No, no you got that wrong! Russia have changed little bit this time…

This time Turk stream went to Greece coastal waters with 2 possible branches! One could go over Bulgaria and another would go over Greece to North Macedonia. So in theory there is alternative to Bulgaria through the other branch towards N. Macedonia… But if Serbia doesn’t build their part towards Hungary (EU) than the Turk stream is dead !!!

It does make “difference” because Russia is supplier of the 1/3 of EU gas. There is nothing that can viably substitute North stream 2 gas that was already needed on EU market. The market that keeps growing in demand. US “LNG” gas is 30% more expensive than Russian pipeline gas. That will ruin the competitiveness of the German industrial products.

And problems will not stop with North stream2 but will continue to Turk stream blocking it as well.

Russia will be forced to answer with the same set of measures(sanctions) to US and their stooges like UK, Germany, etc etc. So this time sanctions risque to put in question any kind of trade between Russia and Western gangsters on the longer run. So Russia will be forced to turn towards ever more growing Asia completely and leave Old Whore Europe to herself.

The UK bought Russian liquid gas last winter when in got colder :)