Click to see the full-size image
Written by Eric Zuesse
As the reality is now beginning to sink in, to the nations of Europe, that their military alliance with America, in America’s anti-Russian NATO, is heading for their collective defeat by Russia, in the battlefields of Ukraine, this is the ideal moment for a magnanimous and peace-oriented Russia diplomatically and privately to be communicating individually to Europe’s leaders, in order to discuss with them the ways that their nations, including Russia, can proceed forward constructively together, to achieve what the U.S. and UK hate, which is win-win progress, instead of win-lose supremacism and vassalship.
The supremacist mentality of imperialists (the master-slave relationship on an international level) dies hard, but can be turned into mutual benefit if the alternative of cooperative advancement is properly presented, as a far superior alternative, and as being unquestionably attainable — which it is. Russia’s task now is to present it as being so.
On July 18th, EuractiveTV headlined “Czech EU minister: making Europe a Federation will make it an equal global player”, and had Czechia’s EU Minister Martin Dvořák telling EURACTIV.cz in an exclusive interview, that though he favors ultimately a United States of Europe, the idea is “not at all popular” in his country. However, if Czechs’ goal is to achieve increased, instead of decreasing, national sovereignty, in their great country, then that objective will be advanced far more by all European countries cooperating together in order to free the Continent from their master-nation across the Atlantic, the U.S. Government, which has around 500 military bases there, occupying European countries. (In Germany alone, there are 231 of them, because America conquered it, though actually the Soviet Union, Europe’s largest country, mainly did — but the U.S. Government and its propaganda-operations expelled Russia and took over all of Germany.)
The only surviving empire is the U.S. empire, and all of Europe except for Russia and Belarus are under its thumb (or, as the U.S. Government likes to say, “under our protection” — insisting upon continued vassalage of, and military occupation of, European nations — which means that those cannot even possibly be sovereign independent nations).
So, Russia’s basic message to Europeans ought to be that Russia wants to have a peace treaty with each and every other European nation, in order to free all of Europe that is willing, from continuing its vassalage to the United States Government, so that ALL of Europe can build together a future that WON’T depend upon military conquest and other forms of purely win-lose relationships, but instead become built ONLY on win-win relationships and free flow of goods in a fully democratic future, and truly, United States of Europe.
The main argument against a United States of Europe is that the individual countries might lose some of their national sovereignty by being a member of it, but that would not happen if the Union’s Constitution will specifically assert that its Constitution pertains ONLY to matters that are external to that federation’s individual countries, and not AT ALL to matters that are internal to its countries. Each member-country would retain its individuality, and the federal Government would be prohibited from touching that.
Would a United States of Europe like this be better than each nation’s continuing to be a vassal of the U.S. Government? That would be the question. This is the question that Russia’s Government should, in private, put to the head-of-state in each European country, and offered as the basis for negotiation with each.
On July 19th, Czechia became the 25th European nation to allow the U.S. Government to place permanent military bases on its soil and thereby to become targeted by Russian missiles. On that same day, the U.S. Senate overwhelmingly (by a vote of 83 to 16) voted down a proposal that America’s Constitutionally required declaration of war by Congress must apply if America invades Russia — that, instead, only the NATO Treaty would apply; and this (if it becomes law in the U.S.) would also mean that for any other NATO country than the United States, there can be no national Constitution that might stand in the way of NATO invading Russia. The deal that Russia would be offering to each European country must be a far better one than that. Wouldn’t it make sense for Russia to be offering such a deal — a win-win deal, instead of the existing win-lose one? Why not?
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s new book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.
russian cabal politicians are the best alliies of the ukropizdan nazi shithole. yesterday the legendary almost mythological strelkov was arrested. under article 280 (part 2) for inciting extremist activities. instead putting him in place of gherasimov and destroy ukroshits in 6 months, they arrest a symbol of russia. pma say it again replace shoigu with strelkov ! for the sake of russian soldiers and a rapid defeat of kukrainii reich.
for the audience who have uncertainties: yes, russia can win this war even without strelkov, but with terrible casualties and in years by now. practically it’s impossible. so, they sacrifice soldiers lives for favoring time, hoping west bandits will see kukrainii failures and will finally come to negotiations. but that’s not guaranteed and even worse: bandera genocidal criminals know that aspect and will force a prolongation as much as possible.
hoping they will change the russian people opinion about the war with a constant flux of casualties (which is false, ukroshits fail here as russians in other matters). for that reason theirs official strategy is to kill as much russians as they can. what’s so hard to understand ? pma again reafirm that is only 25% or 1 in 4 chances west mafioso will settle to negotiations.
and even so, what aces have russia to cede to ukroreich ? zapo and kherson over dpr/lpr ? impossible but…..never knows. if russia would have had the kharkov lost territory, that would have been an excellent deal for bargain, but there isn’t. so, what russia can bargain with yankeestan over ukropizdan ? till now nothing. so, the only way is to completely defeat bandera hellhole and for that only one man is capable: strelkov, the savior of donbass.
strelkov had his day, back in 2014. now he is just a bitter and twisted, sociopathic, narcistic, legend in his own ego. his own fault the trouble he finds himself in today.
when i was growing up, living both in and around london, we had to deal with the ira and their terrorist actions. it was inconvenient, but, just made us stronger in defiance of their evil. same script ukraine nanzis are using, as they try to take their terrorism to mainland russia. funnily enough, the ira (another city of london creation) were launched the same year the bolsheviks (city of london) overthrew the russian empire. notice both terrorist groups run to the same script.
riddle me this, but, besides being a dominant whinger, against the russian leadership, what has strelkov offered russia, since he got dumped in 2014? russia has actually won the special military offensive, just tidying things up now. how many nations supported ukraine with military and mercenaries? how much of ukraine has returned back to russia?
agree. another disappointing decision by the kremlin. they do not dare to arrest and destroy pro-western spies, agents, propagandists and terrorists, but they arrested strelkov?? i do not always agree with him, but this is so wrong. putin didn’t dare to arrest prigozhin either. i guess strelkov saying something on telegram is more dangerous than attempting coup and killing russian soldiers/pilots?
progozhin, was not critical of president putin now was he? he moaned about the generals. the pentagon lost $6 billion, and russia managed to move their forces within close proximity to kiev. strelkov, has destroyed whatever goodwill there was, from 2014, to his political activism and highly critical views of the russian leadership. you would have thought he was working with the sbu, rather than in support of russia.
can you translate that? the reason the political acitivist strelkov is under arrest is the fact that he is critical of the head of russia, when russia is in the middle of the special military offensive. strelkov, once upon a time was worthy of respect, then he became a very bitter man, with a sense of entitlement. funny, how his political party back in 2016, russian national movement ran to the same script as your typical $oro$ sponsored, political party.
it is time not for peace talks, but to lay out potential terms – no nato membership, but eu membership for ukraine. limitations on ukraine forces – verifiable. acceptance of the border changes in their entirety. that would leave ukraine in the eu, would end the war and would remove any threat to russia. by laying out the terms for peace, it forces an evaluation by ukrainians of what they have to gain by fighting.
:like the minsk ii peace agreement, that the un backed and walked away from?
what ‘european nations’? bunch of pathetic cuck vassals owned by yanks. fuck them. almost 40% of europe is russia. russia don’t need eu, eu needs russia.
russia should break all diplomatic relations with most of eu, especially poodle pooland and shitty baltic-banana-statelets. for start turn off their electricity, esto-lolithuanins are still connected to russian electrical grid. puny chihuahuas, let them bark in dark…
“who wants to be the net ukraine?” is a truly awful reality show.
nothing makes money for thieves better than war. peace is not good for billionaires profits. keep sending mercenaries and soldiers for big profits. always more room in grave yards.
como a rússia perdeu a guerra, a única saída é a rússia fazer a paz, mas quem decide é a ucrânia, sem a ucrânia não há acordo, os russos quer a paz, é simples, desocupa as terras da ucrânia e a crimeia.
it was ukraine that has lost the war. she only had to honour the minsk ii peace agreement, but, could not even do that. now russia has both novorussia and crimea back home. in the meantime, the oligarchs are happy, as ukraine has lost their gene pool.
i disagree, now is the time for total war on europe and america’s t o t a l w a r send them all to hell, win lose or draw. it is worth it.
why? is someone experiencing discomfort with the punishment for ukraines continued reflection on its nazi past? is someone tired of seeing nazis being punished for murdering 14000 civilians? is someone having trouble dealing with ukrainians being subtracked from the global gene pool one at a time? i most certainly could watch the punishment metted out for my entire lifetime and never get bored watching the pain and suffering of nazis. glory to russia
what i find seriously strange, is the attitude of poland. the nation that gave allowed the creation of auschwitz, whilst occupied. they are more than happy to support and fund ukraine, despite what bandera and his tribe did to the people of wolyn. yet, the prime minister of poland is ranting and raving, at the words of president putin, reminding them of the actions of bandera and his men. ukraine, who honours his birthday with a national holiday, every year.
polaks are genetical slaves with insane inferiority complex. after centuries of indoctrination (mostly by vatican) they only exist to serve their western master and to hate russia. the same virus infested ukraine, now they are poland 2.0