Illustrative Image
NATO country proves to be involved in provocations against Russia’s ally.
Written by Lucas Leiroz, journalist, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, geopolitical consultant.
Once again, the evidence makes it clear that the West wants to involve Belarus in the current conflict. In a report published by The Times it was informed that exiled Belarusian militants are being trained in Polish territory in preparation for a future insurrection in their country.
According to the newspaper, the “Bypol” group, an extremist dissident militia that actively participated in the attempted color revolution in 2020, is based in the Polish city of Poznan, where an intense military training program is being conducted. Journalists went to the field to interview some of the militiamen and reported that the number of recruits is already “in the hundreds”.
The program would have started many months ago, bringing together “common Belarusians” who want to give a response to President Aleksandr Lukashenko’s “Stalinesque campaign of torture and detention [that] has all but silenced dissent” in Minsk. To add credibility to this narrative, the paper interviewed an exiled woman involved in the training nicknamed “Predator”. The 42-year-old dissident explained that she is the mother of a child who is unaware that she is currently in a military program. The option for combat would apparently have been motivated by the need to “fight for Belarus”.
“My daughter doesn’t know I am here. I told her I was going paintballing (…) []However] I came here today (…) to prepare for the fight for Belarus”, “Predator” told journalists during an interview.
This is a well-known media strategy, widely used by western outlets. The objective is to use an emotional rhetoric to show the supported side as a victim of oppression and an example of heroism and resilience. But for those who know what really happened in Belarus in 2020, this narrative is nothing more than a weak and meaningless fallacy.
The 2020 mass protests were the result of a Western plan to overthrow Lukashenko’s legitimate government and replace him with pro-Western opposition candidate Svetlana Tikhanovskaya. Belarusian security forces were incisive in neutralizing the Western-sponsored threat, and, as in cases of failed regime change operations, the US regarded Lukashenko’s electoral victory as illegitimate and fraudulent, pointing to Lithuania-based Tikhanovskaya as the real winner.
At the time, the Bypol group was created, formed by several dissident former employees of law enforcement agencies. Bypol engaged in active militia work, physically fighting the security forces. The group alleges the supposed “necessity” to face the government’s “state violence”, receiving financial and logistical support from the western powers for this.
As a result of Lukashenko’s victory, most Bypol’s members emigrated to neighboring countries hostile to Minsk, such as Poland, Ukraine, Latvia, Lithuania and the Czech Republic. This did not stop the group from operating sabotage and real combat missions on Belarusian soil, even carrying out a drone attack on a Russian A-50 radar at Machulishchy air base. However, Belarusian security forces closely monitor the militia’s activities and have been effective in preventing further damage from being caused.
In practice, Bypol is an ordinary terrorist organization, which acts like any other extremist group in the world, using terror as a political tool and causing harm to ordinary civilians during its illegal raids. But the West has been openly pro-terror in recent years, being publicly involved in financing and supporting terrorist and neo-Nazi groups such as the Ukraine’s Azov, Right Sector and Aidar, which makes it unsurprising that it gives same support for Bypol. In fact, if the terrorists’ targets are NATO’s geopolitical enemies, then the criminals have “carte blanche” for their maneuvers.
The problem is that amidst the current scenario of tensions, any miscalculated act could lead to a serious escalation. Belarus has been the target of repeated terrorist attacks since the beginning of the Russian special military operation in Ukraine. Minsk is involved in a secondary way in the operation, only allowing Russian troops to use its territory to enter the enemy country, without sending soldiers and weapons directly. The Belarusian attitude is legitimate, considering that Belarus and Russia maintain a collective defense treaty within the Union State, and therefore military actions are absolutely integrated.
This means that western provocations against Russia’s ally are likely to be responded to by Moscow itself. And, in the same sense, considering that these are NATO countries that are training, supporting and infiltrating terrorists in Belarus, the eventual joint response of Minsk and Moscow could even be directed against NATO, which would involve the risk of nuclear escalation.
This only makes it even more legitimate for Minsk to receive Russian nuclear weapons on its territory. Minsk is taking pre-preventive action to dissuade hostile countries from realizing their war plans against the Belarusian people in order to avoid further escalation, as the consequences could be catastrophic.
another failed cia project on the cards. “predator “don’t make laughter go and look after your offspring you silly bitch 🤪 🤣
what prevents russia and belarus training militants to go to brussels and massacre stoltenberg and other pencilnecks who think their war will never reach them?
don’t mix polish aggression with bruxelles politics. you have to find out the states who try to control the eu war efforts. so you have to wipe out poland and the balticsbthese states make the most support for a further and increased war. french is going to negotiate soon if there is no pressure from the east eu.
russia and belarus don’t train terrorists and assassins to do their dirty work. only “western values” nato does.
fewer pygmys required to change lightbulb than polak
known and no doubt that the head of terrorist is the west and otan.
washington dc
well, if attacks come from poland, then it is act of war.
pacea fie cu noi. nu se va intampla nimic. daca se intampla suwalki si tarile baltice dispar. orice scenariu e de luat in calcul. dar primul afectat va fi coridoul suwalki. e pacat si pt ruta avioanelor civile
stupid polskis if you are not successful in ukraine trying belarus?
if they were not a nato member russia should kick them hard.
i do not know a more war loving country in europe like poland. they are sending most weapons and try to engage nato and eu in the ukraine war. poland is the biggest obstacle for peace.
yes , unfortunately true.
my polish cousins can hardly be called wise, they can hardly even be called smart now.
you are kidding. poland has been invaded and partitioned many times.
this is true , however the other side of the story is , it is the country , which had the most conflicts (in europe) with their neighbors in their 1000 years history , and in most cases it was poland which started the wars. they were invaded and divided but they also invaded and divided themselves. truth be told , it is nothing special in the history of mankind , but no reason to play a holy nation (“christus of the nations”), which they cultivate in poland so eager.
what countries did they invade besides lithuania?
poland is doing what amerikans require—they have had poor relations with all neighbor nations throughout history
totally agree , there is at the moment not a single neighbor without conflicts.
the best way for a solid peace on western borders of russia and belarus would be to wipe out warsaw`s goverment with a tactical nuke. the nato would cry but not dare to fight back as long as the storry goes just about the “cheap lives” of stupid canon-fodder poles. they are the replaceable slaves of usa – and very cheap.
totally agree. the most stupid kurwas in history of the world.
there won’t be 1939 again, or may be if the germans and the russians come together and make alliance with the blessings of vatican (not nato or us).
these socialist dictators like in belarus, north korea (stalinist), eritrea and syria (venezuela is not that bad) are not good either. after all, lukashenko was himself saying that svetlana was supported by wagner to overthrow him and he became paranoid like stalin. in all of the world, we see right-wing insurgencies, except for latin america.
dumb greek –moron tiresome
yes maybe , we don’t know exactly , but no reason to train terrorists and send them to belarus ( do you know the case of terrorists trained in us to overthrow the governments in south america, “the school of both americas”? i see a strong similarity to this). poland is just creating so many enemies among their neughbors , that it will be only consequent , they will be themselves invaded and divided again. and then starts a big whining again.
this is not the main point. if this is the case then we are seeing that the us are arming groups that the soviets used to arm like the tplf in ethiopia and the pkk/pjak/ypg/ybs in turkey/iran/syria/iraq. and some people say that here in greece they support far-left anarcho-trotskyist groupuscules.
poland – world “best” at not learning lessons from history.
poland is (as ukraine was) one of the last white nation in europe. globalists jews want to destroy it and replace the population by mixed races, by a multicultural society. then poland will be “de facto” globalists. the brics are challenging us hegemony. so the globalists use the russian blood to fulfill their racial agenda in europe.
when all this is done in ukraine, poland and the baltics are next, and, it won’t be so hard this time round, because nato would have exhausted all their weapons. an open door for russia and belarus to invade.
poland will destroy themselves yet again at the insistence of the british snakes. poland and ukraine are related – genetic defects
putin needs due couple things. first, fire minister of defense and his generals staff. second russia needs mobilize additional 2 millions man/solders. third, russia should start counter offensive in sumy region and from belarus and the same have enough units to attack poland. sonner or later nato will get involved directly. therefore for russia pre-emptive attack on poland and baltic republic will be the right choice right now. third, russia should trigger csto for help.
to get csto help, it makes more sense to let nato make its move. the destruction and failure of nato equipment is going to slowly convince asian countries that the west is losing and the ticket to success is to join in destroying western crap armies and stopping nato
direct hit on polish training bases might give them a hint. article 5 none existent when attacking neighbour using proxies.