Polish President Declared “Erasure Of Borders” With Ukraine, Preparing For War With Russia

Absolutely correct. Ceaucesco was a fool in many aspects but was a REAL patriot which died singing the Socialist Internationale hymn. He NEVER EVER could have done any harm to its peoples or let others destroy economy, agriculture or sovereignty. Exactly, the secret police called SECURITATE betray him for the prospects of theirs stolen and hidden currency (dollars and german marks) with the help of foreign intel agencies, the first being Mossad. For that reason the former Securitate brutes are nowaday most rich persons in the country, owning Mass Media, economy and most important the new intel agencies which were put as slaves to the CIA interests. In fact, 90% of the former SECURITATE agents were and still part of the national secret intelligence agencies. In that position they installed highly corrupt characters in the most parties leadership and use them to deceive peoples regularly every elections. Fuck Ameriscum ! Fuck this Empire of Evil and terror !

Even hungarians have something to claim over Ukropizdan.

Don’t forget the Slovaks.

Oh, OK. On second read you seem to be right.

Poe’s law strikes again. Sarcasm and irony are very difficult to transmit in written form. He used a smiley but I totally disregarded it, my bad I guess.

Against Ukrainians in Ukraine? Polish forces were greedy and wanted all for them, just as the do now.

Use automatic translation for that website and you will get the truth

https://przystanekhistoria.pl/pa2/tematy/ukraina/29398,Wojna-polsko-ukrainska-1918-1919.html

And Kievan Rus’ in X/XI (Vladimir the Great) century replaced all Poles from Przemyśl region to east of their state. Those were Krivichs and Radimichs tribes. Their conquered lands of Finno-Ugric tribes and built Moscow. Nestor the Chronicler mentioned their Polish origin.

They conquered lands of Finno-Ugric tribes and built Moscow. Nestor the Chronicler mentioned their Polish origin.

Yes Rus (Swedes in Eastern Europe originally) conquered many peoples, Slavs and Uralic alike. At some point they adopted Eastern Slavic (Old Russian) as their language and that’s how Russia (Kievan Rus) was born.

History is very convoluted. The English are also a Viking product in many ways (Normans were Vikings who became French but retained Scandinavian elements, notably their warlikeness, love for loot and general greed-driven dishonorability). England and Russia are twin nations in this sense.

But that’s past history, we are now concerned about present history and future history if anything, right?

We should be mostly concerned about making impossible that Europe is turned into a US colony with the pretext of the Ukrainian war and the brain-dead extremist Russophobia, calqued from Ukrainian nazism.

England is about 2/3 Celtic, and the remaining third is a mix of German and Scandinavian. The Normans were a French speaking German tribe. That is why the English royals have distant relatives in Germany. The modern English language is a mixture of French and whatever Germanic language they were speaking at the time. It was high status to know some French, thus the small number of French speakers in the Norman court had a big influence on the local language.

This docu is very objective (excellent WWI history channel): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Gwuu7TXPwI

Wikipedia considers both Krivichs and Radimichs as East Slavs, i.e. not Poles at all, because Poles are West Slavs. In any case that is old history. In those days Polish ethnic identity was at best being formed in the regions of Great Poland, Lesser Poland, Cuyavia, Mazovia and Silesia (further north, while West Slavs, they were not considered Polish, in the case of Prussia, not even Slavic). If you want to actually be truthful to Polsih/West Slavic grudges from those days, reclaim East Germany and even Kiel, which were (Thuringia excepted) absolutely West Slavic in those days.

Of course things do change and 500 years earlier all that, Poland and Ukraine included was pretty much Germanic but the Slavs expanded at the shadow of the Huns (Turkics) and the Germanics invaded the Roman Empire under such pressure.

Yeah, history is complicated but 100 years ago, when Poland and Ukraine were trying to form themselves into nation states after the German surrender created a power vacuum in all that area, the ethnic border was at the Curon Line and that is pretty much the modern eastern border of Poland, all the rest is Polish imperialism.

European history was falsified in XIX century when Poland was not existing as an independent country. One of the biggest secrets is that Poles are Vandals. In Polish language “w” is pronounced as “v” in English and Polish name Wanda is pronounced Vanda. You can find information about Polish XII century legend (about princess Wanda) on Wikipedia. Czechs have a very similar legend. There are a lot of other sources that confirm that Poles are ancient Vandals. Recent genetic research showed that Vikings were not an ethnic group but soldiers from many different ethnic groups. Wolin was one of the biggest centers in X century Europe and Poles apparently had very good relations with Vikings. Also Russians start to admit that Vikings in IX century Novgorod met with Western and not Eastern Slavs. Belorussians genetically are much closer to Poles than to Russians. That was another genetic research made recently. Before partitions of Poland in XVIII century Ukrainian and Belarusian languages were more similar to Polish than to Russian.

When Russians and Germans were erasing Polish history in XIX century (earlier they falsified Chronicles of Długosz in 1702 and stole one of the biggest libraries in Europe – Załuski library and said that Prokosz Chronicle was a forgery) they forgot about column of Sigismund III in Warsaw. The sign there was that he was a 44th king of Vandals. That would make the first official ruler of Poland – Mieszko I just a15 th ruler of Poland. Mieszko’s I daughter was a famous queen of England, Sweden, Norway and Denmark – Sygryda Storrada

And Friedrich Nietzche said himself “I am a pure-blooded Polish nobleman, without a single drop of bad blood, certainly not German blood.” and “Germany is a great nation only because its people have so much Polish blood in their veins.”

do you want to know more erased secrets about Poland? This one is also huge; https://culture.pl/en/article/the-truth-behind-christopher-columbuss-polish-roots Manuel Rosa, a Portuguese historian, claims that the man who discovered America was not of Genoese origin as is commonly believed, but descended from a Polish King. Culture.pl investigates his hypothesis. The twelve-toed king It is told that 15th-century Polish King Władysław III had six toes on each foot. He was also the son of the great Polish king Władysław Jagiełło, who defeated the Teutonic Order in the famous battle of Grunwald, and ruled over a mighty empire that ranged from the Baltic to the Black Sea. He ascended the Polish throne in 1434 and received Hungarian crown in 1440 to boot. As King of Hungary he waged war against the Ottoman Empire and died, at the age of 20, in the 1444 Battle of Varna, a crucial episode of the conflict. The fight was lost by the Hungarians and their allies and the king himself was slain on the field after leading a charge into the enemy’s ranks. However, the ruler’s body was never formally identified, a strange occurrence considering his unusual feet. This led to speculation that the monarch actually survived and that the accounts and stories about his death were untrue. According to some, after the lost battle the baffled king travelled to the Portuguese island of Madeira in the Atlantic Ocean, where he lived incognito as Henrique Alemao (Henry the German) for the rest of his days.

Portuguese historian Manuel Rosa supports the abovementioned hypothesis. Moreover, he maintains that after the battle the Polish king not only came to Madeira but also had a son, Christopher Columbus. That’s right. After over 20 years of extensive research, Rosa, an employee of Duke University, is dead certain that the great navigator was of royal Polish descent. Fluent in many languages, the historian studied countless accounts and documents about Columbus written in Spanish, Portuguese, English and Italian before he published this revelation in a book entitled Columbus ‒ The Untold Story. Interestingly, his dubious-sounding claim has some pretty substantial backing …

A golden double cross Let’s break down the main arguments used by Rosa to support his theory that America’s discoverer was in fact the son of the Polish king Władysław III. First, he points out physical resemblance. (Look at the portraits above and judge for yourself.) Historic descriptions of the two point out similarities in their countenances. Additionally, Rosa found that Columbus’ original coat of arms had gold anchors on a blue background. It just so happens that Segismundo Henriques, son of Henrique Alemao (who did actually live in Madeira, beyond any doubt), also had a coat of arms with gold anchors on a blue background. And here the plot thickens: rulers of the House of Jagiełło, Władysław III among them, used a golden double cross on a blue background as their coat of arms, a symbol which closely resembles Columbus’s anchors very easily.

It is also worth noting that in the 16th century the descendants of Henrique Alemao were officially acknowledged by the Spanish royal court being descended from royal Polish lineage. This coincides nicely with a 1472 letter sent by a Franciscan monk from Portugal to the grand master of the Teutonic Order, in which the author writes that he’s seen Władysław III on Madeira. Two other monks, who were sent to Madeira from Poland, claimed they recognized the king in Alemao. One might add that in Portugal the term ‘Alemao’ (German) was once applied to members of all peoples from beyond the Rhine, including Poles.

A Madeira native Why would Władysław III want to live incognito in Madeira, and be Henrique Alemao the humble knight, and not in Central Europe, where he would be king? Rosa postulates that he simply became disenchanted with ruling after being defeated by the Ottomans, and longed for a different life. As the king of a mighty state, he would have had to go through much hardship after his abdication, hence the elaborate scheme. In this version of events Columbus protected his father’s privacy by concealing his own background, of which he was probably aware.

Rosa’s theory, although exotic, helps explain certain facts from Columbus’ life. Namely, his marriage to a Portuguese aristocrat which occurred long before he became famous for discovering America, his receiving of a broad education that enabled him to become an expert navigator, and his residing in Madeira for some time, near Alemao’s palace. The first two events would have been unlikely to befall a simple weaver’s son from Genoa. On the other hand, they very well could have, for a man of royal descent. Additionally, Rosa believes that the Portuguese court was privy to the secret of Alemao’s identity and supported both him and his son, Columbus.

All in all, Rosa presents a strong case for Columbus’s Polishness. It might be worth looking into whether Cristiano Ronaldo, a Madeira native, isn’t also Polish…

LOL, Columbus was Genoese, it’s well determined by many documents. The Genoese were at that time very active in Portugal in search for new slave markets (or markets of any kind) after the Turkish conquest of Byzantium cut their access to the Black Sea and thus to Eastern Europe, from where slaves (term directly derived from Slav and thus a bit racist) came from.

They stumbled on Black Africa and turned it into another slave hunting ground, a new Eastern Europe on steroids.

That doesn’t mean that Poles, Czechs and Ashkenazi Jews were also not involved in the Slavic slave trade: they were and very intensely so, as were the Russian (generically Rus) oligarchies and the European Turkics (Tatars). But in the sea that role belonged to the Italian republics rather and that’s why there were so many Italians such as Columbus, Cabot and Vespucci involved in the early exploration of the Atlantic Ocean for colonialism and slaveism. Columbus is pretty much the hinge on which the shift from Slavic slavery to African (and Native American) slavery happened.

Maju, I hate to break it to you, but the old tale that the discoverer of America was a Genoese Columbus is now sunk by Manuel Rosa. The first thing Rosa proved was that the discoverer was never called Columbus/Colombo. His Spanish name was Colón. This name is still used today by his descendants. Colombo and Colón were two different people. The Genoese one was a poor wool weaver who declared himself to be 19 years old to a notary in 1470 and described himself as a weaver to that notary. The other was a full-time navigator from the age of 14 and declared in a 1503 letter to the Castilian court to have been 28 years old in 1484 when he arrived in Spain. The discoverer Colón married a Portuguese elite noble dame in 1479. Colón’s wife was so elite that 3 of her cousins from her mother and father’s side were countesses and 1 was a marquesa. Another cousin was the Lord-Chamberlain of King John II of Portugal while one of the countess’s husband was the captain of King John II’s Royal Guard. Her uncle was Captain of the King’s archers and her brother-in-law was part of the 25 royal guards, plus her brother was Captain of the Island of Porto Santo!!! Now tell us how a poor Genoese weaver named Colombo fits into this story?

Also, did know that the Portuguese starting in 1492, a decade before “Columbus” had a trading post in Ghana where they traded for black slaves which were than sold in Europe?

Colón is the Castilian (“Spanish”) version of the name, Colombo in Italian, Columbus in Latin, Colomb in Catalan, etc. The Catalan version is important because in those days sailors used the so-called Lingua Franca, which was not anymore a version of French (as was 500 years earlier in the crusades) but was rather a version of Italian with strong Iberian influences, more Catalan and Portuguese than Castilian (steppe people with little marine inclinations).

So it’s Colombo > Colomb (a common Catalan surname) > Colón (an extremely rare Castilian surname). Why is it so rare in Castilian? Because Colombo and Colomb mean “pidgeon”, “dove”, while “Colón” means nothing at all (unless it’s someone who skips the proper order at a queue, i.e. “colarse”). Castilian for “dove” is “paloma” and you have indeed surnames like Palomar (dovecot) and even Palomo (male pidgeon). The only possible way that Colón was formed was from either Italian or Catalan.

As for who “discovered” America, it was obviously the natives living there since maybe 20,000 years ago, but from the Old World that we have clear evidence of, it was Icelander/Norwegian sailor Leifr Eirikson.