0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
2,200 $
8 DAYS LEFT UNTIL THE END OF SEPTEMBER

Repars Of Russia’s Admiral Kuznetsov After Fire Incident Will Cost $1.5 billion: Reports

Support SouthFront

Repars Of Russia's Admiral Kuznetsov After Fire Incident Will Cost $1.5 billion: Reports

Click to see full-size image

Repairs of the damages caused to the Admiral Kuznetsov heavy aircraft carrying missile cruiser by the fire on December 12th, would cost approximately 95 billion rubles (about $1.5 billion), an unnamed source in the Northern Fleet told Kommersant.

“This is not only about damage to the structures of the aircraft carrier, but also about damaged repair equipment and also due to the injuries to the military and civilian specialists,” he explained.

According to the official version of events, a spark from welding fell on some of the debris in the hold, which led to a fire.

At the same time, another source of Kommersant previously noted that the consequences of the accident are unlikely to be catastrophic for the ship.

The Admiral Kuznetsov warship was transferred to the United Shipbuilding Company in April 2018.

Civilian specialists have to completely upgrade the power systems and armaments of the ship under a contract worth about 60-65 billion rubles ($1 billion). The same contract involves the reconstruction of the dry dock which will cost another 23 billion rubles ($370 million).

According to the Kommersant source, due to the repair work, almost all of the equipment on the Admiral Kuznetsov had been dismantled, so only communications equipment has allegedly burned onboard the warship, mostly power cables and communication lines. All of these were supposed to be replaced within the framework of the concluded contract.

Thus, the 95 billion rubles in damages is a puzzling, and massive cost, having in mind that the entire retrofit of the warship didn’t cost that much to begin with.

To compare costs, the USS Gerard R. Ford aircraft carrier itself costs $13 billion, with the entire program costing upwards of $30. Regardless – a brand new aircraft carrier, a massive warship, commissioned in July 2017 costs $13 billion, while the repairs of equipment that was about to be replaced somehow cost approximately $1.5 billion more.

To provide some additional scope, the entire program for the British Royal Navy’s two new aircraft carriers – the HMS Queen Elizabeth and the HMS Prince of Wales costs $8 billion USD.

When the incident with the Admiral Kuznetsov happened, there were three possible explanations:

  • Sabotage – the goal of such actions is to deliver a devastating PR blow to the Russian Navy and Russia itself, and to delay the plans to put the Admiral Kuznetsov back into service.
  • Criminal Negligence – in this case, one of the main reasons is a poor production behavior that has become common for the modern Russia. Not so many representatives of the powerful Soviet engineering school remain in the defense industry. The Soviet system of engineering education was destroyed. The new one is not so effective .The Russian defense industry suffers from a lack of young skilled and motivated specialists.
  • Corruption – the fire occurred at the first energy compartment. This is one of the most complex and expensive parts of the warship. Millions of dollars have already been spent on the maintenance of it and other equipment of the warship. The fire accident may allow to spend even more money on the maintenance of the warship.

Therefore if these reports by Kommersant’s sources are true, this would indicate that the massive scale corruption may have been one of the key sources of the issues with the Russian Navy’s only heavy aircraft carrying missile cruiser.

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sephiroth

Russia should burn this piece of crap completely and build a new one.

Hasbara Hunter

No boats…Missiles….Hypersonic Missiles…The entire AngloZioNazi Fleet will be Sitting Ducks waiting to be Transformed into Submarines

wwinsti

That would be a superb final service for the Kuznetsov,. First, get it buoyant, then hall it out to sea and use it for kinzal/zerkon missile practice. Coupled with lots of insane angled drone footage, it would finally leave an impression that desperately needs to be made.

Dušan Mirić

Scrap that junk!

PZIVJ

1.5 BILLION DOLLARS FOR REPAIRS FROM THE FIRE ?!

BMWA1

Its too much….Russia still lacks big ship yards….this was built in Nikolaev Ukraine….in terminal Soviet times…..and it shows.

Seems like it is time to reconsider.

Hasbara Hunter

See…Boats are useless floating coffins…

Black Waters

Focus on the Shtorm.

SnowCatzor

Someone in the shipyards is taking the Russian taxpayer for a ride on this one. Much of that $1.5 billion is probably intended to enrich their own pockets, because there’s no way it should cost that much. It makes me sick how much corruption there is in the shipbuilding industry, if Putin was serious about eliminating it then he should go there and sort them out.

At this point I don’t think it’s even worth repairing the Kutznetsov, just scrap it. If they still want carrier’s, they should ask the Chinese if they can build them a new one. They already know how to build Kutznetsov class ships anyway.

MzUnGu

If your job is to repair a boat, it would make sense to keep the cash cow in the docks for as long as possible. That boat is gonna buy everyone a lot of vodka.

Neo Onh

According to “unnamed source” in Kommersant – an anti-Russia, anti-Putin, liberal-traitor owned propaganda paper…….. yeah, I believe in Santa too…..

Pommy Pie

Fuck ….just sell it to China already

Dick Von Dast'Ard

Best thing they could do is float it out and sink it with a Kinzhal, Tsirkon and/or a heavy weight torpedo as a demonstration to the USN of Russia’s carrier killers.

Dick Von Dast'Ard

New Borei-K (cruise missile and Tsirkon firing cruiser submarine) would cost the same, converting a couple of Project 941 Akula into a guided missile firing cruiser submarine would be a similar cost.

Icarus Tanović

Very likely to be a western sabotage of some sort.

Ivan Freely

“Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.”

The thought has crossed my mind. We’ll know on the next incident.

Bio_ Hazard

At this point the carrier is just too expensive to maintain. Russia needs a better carrier to be built

Mehmet Aslanak

1.5 billion dollars seems like too high for an old boat. But do not forget Russia’s infamous bribe system. Probably it would cost 1/3 of it without the bribes.

Dick Von Dast'Ard

Future for the ship would be best suited as a ASW/AsuW command ship with all it’s Su-33’s either sent to Arctic or Pacific permanent airbases, leaving a small air-wing complement of MiG-29K’s for ASW/ASuW task force defence.

19
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x