Russian General: We Are ‘Teetering on Brink of War’ with the United States

Whoa, you know, part of my family is polish and I can 100% assure you, USSR was waay too merciful to poland, waaay more than to germany, ofc in germany red army commiited crapton of crimes,(rest of allied forces did too). Part of germany was even given to Poland, USSR supported Polands independance and maintained close mutually beneficial relationship for quite long time.. till chauvinist NATO-fanboys came to power and fucked it up so everybody runs to UK for work, we’ve flooded UK so much that it left the EU due to OUR fault, our sheer numbers are far too large, this is also the reason why turkey, ukraine, russia etc will never join EU, theyre huge and poor = floods western countries in search for fortune, EU did this mistake with Poland once, Poland isnt that huge anyway, but the effects were devastating,

USSR was too merciful to Poland?! WTF? They invaded Poland on 17th of September 1939! How is that merciful? I as hell am glad the Soviets packed up their army and FO home in 1993. An unvited guest for 54 years.

Tell us some about wrangler, how he invaded russia, how murderd tens of thousends of russian poeple. olds, children, women.

tell us something about how you invaded czechoslovakia together with hitler in 1938!!!

you were and stood fascists!

No one died when Poland ‘invaded’ Czechoslovakia, it was a couple of towns. Not one shot was fired. Same thing when Russia ‘invaded’ Crimea. Not one shot was fired. I guess in your opinion that’s not an invasion now, is it.

hahaha!

Well, at least you have a sense of humor.

Poles? Poland had fascistic government before WWII. Poland was the best comrade of nazi Germany when divided Czechoslovakia. The ethnical border of Poles was there, where is now the eastern border of Poland. Where was the ethnical border on the west? Ha? The poles gor Silezia, got baltic shore. In the case of poles the russian made from nobody somebody!

Except it was the Germany governement that “discovered” that one.

Sorry, it was investigated by the Swiss Red Cross and verified as a Soviet war crime.

Legit.

Katyn reveals something else and its pretty telling that so many ignores it.

It shows that the Soviet governement of the time had the intention to restore a Polish state sometimes in the then near future. The way to do that was going to war against Germany and that they did not fear a German invasion of the Soviet-Union either (otherwise they would have removed all evidences after the defeat of France). The truth is that Hitler only ordered an attack on the Soviet-Union not out of warmongering like the neo-cons does but because he correctly saw Stalin and the upper Soviet governement demand for military bases in Bulgaria right next to Germany´s maine remaining source of oil as an intention to break the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalin%27s_Missed_Chance

it was the western ukrain..

Maybe you should look at a map.

you know the curzon-line?

What does that have to do with Polish borders in 1939?

like german borders in 1940 – Won in a brutal war

The Curzon-Line was won in a brutal war?

no, the polish border 1939

You need to study history a little more

I’m Polish and I reject our government fucked up position, pretty sure there’s millions like me here, unfortunately majority is brainwashed beyond repair

The Sudeten were driven out by the Czechs and rightly so! In this history, the Sudeten should regard it as a gift that they have survived

Barb, you are outmost confused. You jump from Soviets to Washington to Middle East. Stay on topic?

Now, since you had balls to tell us about your aunts, please share with us how your father participated in genocide and murder of 20 million CIVILIANS while in Soviet Union.

Maybe you should try reading my comment again – use a dictionary if you can’t understand the big words.

Barb, still no comments on your father particapating in massacre of 20 million CIVILIANS? Little nazie you are then. Like father, like son. But boy, you were quick and hot to blame soviets for alleged rapes.

One must be completed dumb to believe in what you’ve just wrote…

No, it’s what happens when you stop believing the propaganda machine and start doing objective research. You know, the Allies of WWII are the same people playing these games in Syria now. Josef Drugashvili aka Stalin, was a Georgian Freemason who hated Russians, and appointed a documented serial killer (Lavrentiy Beria) to run the NKVD. Maybe you forgot how many people Uncle Joe killed in the Soviet Union?

It seems what is shit for the rest of the humans is staple diet for you, Scott.

Oh my! The master of rhetoric and reason strikes again! You must be the terror of your kindergarten with such sophistry as that!

bullshit!

You think so? Well, why don’t you try reading up on Russian Civil War, and how the Red forces conducted themselves amongst their own people? Read about Nikolai Yezhov. Read about how Beria got made head of the Transcaucausus OGPU, then worked his way up to top, finally getting his boss Yezhov shot. Read about some of Beria’s ‘hobbies’ as regards driving around and grabbing women off the street. About the purges of 30s and 25 million Soviet citizens killed by Stalin and Beria. While you are at it, you might try reading about how Soviet female prisoners were treated by their own army when they were liberated, to get a really good idea of the thoroughly Stalin and Beria and brutalised and degraded the people of the Soviet Union in their reign. Then you come back and tell me it doesn’t fit the pattern perfectly.

Communism was a Masonic creation, just another religion, another set of puppet strings. False-flag attacks are the Masonic speciality.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. They will clamour for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.

– Josef Stalin

“strictly disciplined force” – definitely not at the eastern front “Many Russian women married German soldiers and went home with them…” – impossible because of race laws “Most of the crimes committed against the Russian people in WWII were undertaken by the NKVD and made to appear as German” . like babi jar?? fo, go and defend the nazicrum somewhere else

Well, that simply shows your ignorance of the period. First, Germany had no ‘Race Laws ” with regard to anyone but Jews, so nothing barred a German from marrying a Russian. Many Russian emigres lived in Germany and intermarried.

Second, even the SS, which did have much stricter rules (German ancestry back to 1850/1750 depending on whether enlisted or officer) frequently completely ignored them. Heinrich Himmler sent several angry letters to Sepp Dietrich, commander of 1st SS Division LSSAH, because Dietrich had allowed a number of his people to marry women in the Ukraine, not even bothering to ask the SS Main Office about it.

Third, Babi Jar was conducted by Ukrainians, AND is itself questionable, in light of Stalin’s propaganda machine.

Stop living in the shadow of Georgian Masons and believing their lies. Freemasons want to keep Russians and Germans apart, because they fear destruction at their hands. That’s what WWII was all about.

Scott in Delerium

Wow! Such a sophisticated and elegant argument! It must have taken you awhile to compose that.

When you get tired of living in the fantasy world Freemasonry has constructed for you, do the research for yourself and see. You can only truly find the truth by your own endeavours.

You know, this isnt really the place to glorify nazi germany, there’s a lot of places like that on the dark web

Well, you’ve clearly completely missed the point of what I said. While I am obviously arguing that the Germany of that time has been horribly slandered by a massive Freemason disinformation operation, tell me, how exactly did I glorify the Third Reich? I argued that they had the most highly disciplined army. Not Hitler’s doing, and I’d have said the same in WWI, or Frederick the Great’s era.

Did you see me lauding Rosenberg’s idiotic racial theories? I think not. Did you see me blame it all on the Jews? No, I correctly identified the Masonic culprits, of which the Zionist leadership of the Jews are but one faction. Hitler fell for the Anglo-Zionist trap, and now his country is a sad Anglo-Zionist vassal. Russia seems to have narrowly avoided a like fate. Glory to Russia.

I pointed out that Germany and Russia have long had a common enemy, elements of which created the Soviet Union and inflicted endless suffering on the Russian and German people, as they still seek to do today. What strikes you as especially National Socialist about that? I would like to see Russia and Germany as friends, allies, partners. They have a lot in common. They are brilliant scientists, mathematicians, engineers and musicians with tremendous capacity to withstand hardship.

Is there something about accusing Stalin, Beria and the NKVD of crimes that you find especially National Socialist? Because by the standard, I think a lot of Russians are such too.

Or perhaps you think questioning the Freemason propaganda machine’s account of WWII is National Socialist? I suggest you re-think that one also.

Well, this isn’t a place to glorify the Soviets.

and glorify the nazi poland

Freemaosn actuyally have a very advanved, phislophical cosmology. The problem is how political Freemaons twist it to justify their greed, their egos, thei callouness and their ambition.

Very well. Get settled in for a long read. Also, I have endeavoured to answer your question absolutely honestly, not set out to offend you, but suffice it to say that many things I say may do so. Nonetheless, offence is not my intention, only honesty.

Freemasons created both Judaism and Christianity, hence why, having done my research, I view them through the same lens. Exoteric Judaism, and exoteric Christianity were wholly created as political and social control mechanisms, nothing more. What “Christians” practice bears only the most tangential relation to what Yahoshua ben Joseph (Jesus) the Essene/Nazorean did. The Council of Nicaea sat down and took assorted books used by various sects that identified themselves as Christian, and chopped them up, taking out all the stuff they didn’t like, like the all important Book of Mary. Constantine had no interest whatever the in the Council’s creation as a spiritual vehicle. Same for Judaism. Kabbalsitic Judaism is the spiritual vehicle. The Exoteric kind is a control mechanism for the masses. It’s like that with everything they do, including Freemasonry itself. The esoteric first 3 degrees are merely a social tool, while the higher degree hide everything else.

Let me quote Pope Leo X: “It has served us well, this myth of Christ.”

If you want to get to anything close to what the followers of Yahoshua practised, you have to look to Gnostic sects. The Thessalines, the Cathars, or the Mandeans, who still survive in southern Iraq, and are there decendents of those people, the tribe Yahoshua was part of.

The Essenes or Nazoreans were a group that went into the wilderness, rejecting the practices of mainstream Judaism, believing that the inner practices must be taught, not hidden away for the elect. They were strict vegetarians, and rejected the animal sacrifice of the contemporary Sadducees They rightly refused to recognize the “divine revelation” of the psychopathic war criminal Moses. Mary and Joseph were their leaders. Yahoshua and his brother James were their children. John the Baptist was their cousin, and also at one point a centurion in the local Roman Auxilia. (The Mandeans follow John to this day as their spiritual guide.) James was actually their selected heir, because Joseph, Mary and James all regarded Yahoshua as a dangerous hothead. The Essenes wanted nothing to do with politics, living in seclusion in the wilderness for a reason, but Yahoshua wanted to lead a rebellion against both the Sadducees and the Romans. Mary Magdalen was Yahoshua’s wife, and most important disciple. The Dead Sea Scrolls are documents of the Essenes. The Essenes considered themselves, and all people “children of god.”

Now, the problems start with Paul, who was actually born Saul, and was a Romanised Jew who worked as an administrative official for the local Roman government. He had gotten lost in the desert and gotten severe sunstroke, and went mad not too long after the events that led to Yahoshua being crucified. He traveled back to Europe, where he spread a wild, raving account of this Jesus, Son of God, which bore very little relation to the truth. Yahoshua, like all his people, called everyone “sons and daughters of God.” He had never claimed to be any more the child of God than anyone else, though he had strongly hinted that he was the awaited Messiah. Paul/Saul, in addition to being mad, was unacquainted with the private practices of the Essenes, so he was unable to actually pass on much of their spiritual practices, and also, saw things through the distorted view of a Romanised Jew. He could not comprehend that Mary Magedalen, being a women, was actually the most important of Yahoshua’s followers, nor that Essene religious congregations actually required a female high priestess. Neither did he grasp that the Essenes practised things like ecstatic group sex, often in combination with hallucinogens as a method of divine communion (much they the sietch tau orgies in the novel Dune). Likewise, they did not treat men and women differently, didn’t kill people for adultery, practised birth control, and really followed none of the prudish, bigoted and sexist ideas exhorted in the Old Testament. Instead, Paul/Saul seems to have hated women, and been terrified of sex, and assumed the Old Testament writing he was familiar with somehow had some relation to Jesus. He also didn’t get that ‘God’ to the Essenes was more a kind of Pantheistic spirit in everything (The Holy Ghost), and NOT a anthropomorphic personality who threw temper tantrums. He further missed that Essenes believed in reincarnation, and that this, the material world was hell, and that people were forced to reincarnate in it until they found enlightenment, exactly as in Buddhism. (And there is a reason for that.)

Then there was Peter. Peter was a failed disciple. You see Yahoshua had gotten this idea that he needed to spread enlightenment outside the Essene community, then lead the people in a rebellion against the corrupt Sadduccees and the Maccabean dynasty, who hoarded all the Kabbalistic secrets, and allowed and encouraged many things the Essenes found abhorrent, like usury, animal sacrifice, slavery, sexism, eating of flesh, etc. To do this, he need to teach the common people how to live as Essenes. Therefore, he set out to collect a literally random group of people, who became his disciples. The problem was, used to the tightly controlled, oppressive ways of the Sadducees, they had a really hard time adapting to the laidback, open ways of the Essenes. Now Judas mostly got it. He was the only really successful disciple (other than Mary). Peter, however, really struggled to get over all the prejudices and preconceived notion he had been raised with. His biggest problem wasMary Magdalen. It absolutely infuriated him that Yahoshua talked with her about things that he didn’t talk with Peter about, saying that Peter wouldn’t understand at this point. Maybe worse, Yahoshua treated her as more important than him and the other male disciples, which was just incomprehensible to his piggy little mind and fragile ego.

His vast jealousy towards Mary would later be reflected in the things he said in Rome, where he not only claimed to be the senior disciple, he even called Mary a prostitute, and denounced Yahoshua’s second favourite, Judas, as a traitor, and also lead things back toward the Judean prejudices he was comfortable with, though less so than Paul.

See the problem? Peter and Paul are regarded as the fathers of the church, but completely twisted everything Yahoshua taught beyond recognition.

And along came Constantine. His empire was having an identity crisis, and having noted the cultic devotion found amongst the Mithraites, Zoroastrians, and the now hundreds of squabbling sects of Christians (thanks to the confusion caused by Peter and Paul), his advisors recommended they get themselves a state religion. He wasn’t too keen, and probably would have gone with Mithraism, except that his mother, a Romanised British noble, was a follower of one of these Christian sects, and so, purely to humour her, he insisted her religion had to be included. However, all the freethinking, anti-political ideas of the Essenes, and even the still kind of radical Peter, just wouldn’t do. The focused on Paul’s ravings, and folded back in all the paternalistic, vengeful/jealous God, do-as-I-say-not as I do, don’t question, don’t think, pay your taxes, fear authority swill that the Old Testament and the Sadduccees offered, because that suite their purpose. They stripped out references to Mary Magdalen as anyone of any significance, and brought things back to the usual patriarchal garbage. They also shifted the Sabbath to Sunday, to please the Mithraites. They created a powerful priesthood, and ignored Yahoshua’s injunction that God could only be found within, and no priest to intercede with God for you. They did their best to overlook that Yahoshua had said one should not pay tithes to the priests (or the government!), and instead insisted ‘Christians’ needed to do both.

So, knowing that it really is a political construct, I can’t really take it seriously as anything spiritual. Also, the Old Testament is merely a heavily edited rehash of older Babylonian religion, itself an edited rehash of the Sumerian version. In each case, the power-that-be played up their deities of choice, and downplayed trivial ones, and edited events to suit their aims. An example: God vs. the Lord God. In the Hebrew, God is ELHM, generally said Elohim. It is a neuter plural word, and refers to the pantheon of gods and goddess collectively, hinting pretty loudly at the origins. Meanwhile, the Lord God is written YHVH, or Yehovah. He is the personal God of the Israelities, created by the fear-monger Moses, an Egyptian prince and sorcerer/Freemason of the invading Hyksos line, who made the vengeful, jealous, sacrifice-your-sons-to-me jerk to keep his followers in line. Both appear because through much of the history of the Israelties/Hyksos, they lived inside larger empires, where their god was acknowledged as a tribal god, but no more than that, by wherever state they owed fealty to. Telling the rulers of Babylon their YHVH was the chief god would have been a bad idea, but the Babylonians were totally fine with them having their own personal minor deity. That is why Genesis features creation twice; first, God/ELHM, the pantheon of divines,, creates the earth and man and woman in their image and the animals and plants, and later, in a following section, Lord God/YHVH crates Adam and Eve.

Now, to answer your second question: Yes, before I knew anything about Freemasons, or the truth behind Yahosua the Essene, I read the Bible, as a child and teenager. My father made a very vague attempt to bring me up Methodist. I can’t say I was impressed. First, without having the Hebrew, and the Kabbalistic underpinnings, and the historical background about Babylon and Sumeria, the book makes little sense. Second, all the blatant sexism was immediately noxious to me. Even having Eve made from Adam’s rib is pretty silly. Scientifically women are clearly ‘the original’ gender, as can still be seen in come species. Third, the whole thing with Lucifer having no free will, but being evil even though made exactly as intended, and Adam and Eve having no free will but being sinful for ‘choosing’ eating the apple that gave them free will was too much of of a logical contradiction. Fourth, all the wacky and arbitrary rules and the whole submit-yourself-to-authority-unconditionally theme completely turned me off, as a freethinker. The blood sacrifices didn’t appeal either. And that whole awful section in Numbers, where Moses is telling them that they need to kill all the Canaanite males regardless of age, and all the non-virgin women, but they can take all the virgin women/girls as brides? Suffice it say, I don’t like Moses, and any religion he ‘discovered’ I’m happy to keep far away from.

That being said, Gnostic Christianity and Kabbalistic Judaism seem reasonably spiritual to me, as long as they are strictly non-political. Though of course, that is very much like what Freemasons practice, as you hinted. But there is the irony: it’s not what Freemaons

All these barrage of words is showing just one basic underpinning thought and that is the denial of God’s existence. First of all It’s clear to me that you haven’t watched the video. You do that first and then we can carry on with the discussion. By the way your world view is far from being original and authentic to say the least. You should acknowledge that with any bit of honesty. One thing is whether He exists or not and the other how comfortably a person can live with it. Jesus in His goodness through the apostle Paule has prepared almost 2000 year ago an answer to your questioning of His nature and character. If you are serious truth seeker it should make you rethink your cosmology without prejudice. Here you go. This is a perfect description of where you come from. For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. 24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. Rom 1:18-25 (NKJV)