The Russian military has broken another record. According to reports by various Russian military sources, Su-35S fighter jet of the Russian Aerospace Forces shot down Ukrainian MiG-29 at a distance of more than 200 km.
Ukrainian aircraft was reportedly attacked by the Russian R-37M long-range air-to-air missile, which covered a record distance of 213 kilometers. This is reportedly the record distance of destruction of a target by an aircraft missile.
The MiG-29A fighter of the Ukrainian Air Force was reportedly spotted by Russian pilots at a distance of about 270 kilometers. The Ukrainian aircraft was struck when it was preparing to launch the US-made AGM-88B Block 3 HARM anti-radar missile. As a result of the strike, the target disappeared from Russian radar and did not come back to the Ukrainian airfield.
Currently, Russian R-37M hypersonic air-to-air missile is the most long-range guided air-to-air missile in the world. Its maximum range is 300 kilometers. The rocket has a launch mass of over half a ton, and the weight of its warhead is 60 kg. It is designed to destroy air targets, including enemy aircraft.
as secretary toilet scrubber for dane nazi senility party i forget
in times when a completely outdated ukrainian patriot air defense is liquidating russian hypersonic missiles, and the same completely outdated ukrainian patriot air defense 25!! from 24!! russian drones, it is also possible to shoot down aircraft at a distance of 200km.
i am already looking forward to ww3, when nato will attack with m3 us launchers from 1968 🤡 😆😆😆
now you can earn up to from 50000 bucks a month! there are no limitations, be your own boss, it all depends on you and how much you bsd want to earn each day. this is a genuine and guaranteed method for free to earn a huge sum of money at home. join this right now >>>>>>>>> richepay4.blogspot.com
the ukro-nazi pilot slave of uncle shmuel and his vassals, lapdogs, satellites and whores had no idea what hit him. rest in pieces. a 60 kilogram warhead is about the explosive force of a 152 mm. artillery shell. slava rossiye!
how can a pilot on a radar screen see that enemy mig29 is preparing to launch anti radar missile. just asking.. if some brains left in the discussion as clearly, articles are generated by some brainless pigs.
because the target was already locked by the nazi pilot u idiot
idiot ? who is idiot ? anti radar missile fly in passive mode, targeted on radar’s own signal. another brainless pig in the discussion can explain that?
dumb amerikunt
really valuable contribution to the discussion lol. but really, my question persists. how can one detect on a radar that the airplane is going to launch a missile. it is a fair question and i want answers as i have already my own theories about that.
only a moron argues w idiot amerikunt…”when i tell the truth i do not write to convince those that do not know but to defend those that do”. william blake
ok so i didn’t got any reasonable answers from sf or their mobs. so let sum it up. 1st – the most likely explanation – article is a bullshit. su35 took off, 300km from the contact line fired missile on alleged target and then returned, pretending they shot down something. 2nd russians switch on stationary radar as decoy, baited mig29 to take off, russian spy on the ukraine airfield reported back. su 35 ambushed mig29 with standard ir short range missiles. 3rd the same with long range missiles.
4th – the ghost of kiev is a wunderpilot with magical abilities, his mig-29, blessed by the soul of democracy, can disappears from any radar any time. source : cnn.
you just labelled sf propaganda on pair with cnn trash, congratulations. it explains everything.
“amerikunts are the living refutation of the cartesian cogito ergo sum. amerikunts are yet they do not think. the amerikunt mind is primitive and peurile…” julius evola
dear jens, have you been injecting that same jive juice they shoot biden up with for ten minutes worth of cognition.?
you live in a pretend world. there’s the correct answer.
it should probably say: the mig 21 was almost within range of the russian radar that was switched on near it. the russians know about the harm missiles. their range, etc. it all looked like a harm attack, i think. and it is the military who do these analyses, they know what the other side is doing.
sorry, it is my theory nr 2 and nr 3 which are contradicting original narative that it was russian pilot who detected ukrainian mig29. not stationary radar. btw it is impossible for russian pilot detect enemy plane on such long distance despite the radar signature of the mig29 is really big one with 3-5 square meters , but the best fighter jets radars in the world cant detect that beyond 175 km so it is debunked. the article is simply not telling what really happened.
“amerikunts speak about themselves and their achievements as they did when they were little children”. geoffrey gorer
using the su-35’s electronic control and mechanical additional turn of the irbis-e’s antenna allows the maximum deflection angle of the radar beams to reach a very wide 120°. the radar can scan not only widely, but also over great distances over four times those of the original su-27’s n001 radar with the ability to track aircraft with a three square meter radar cross section up to 400km away.
ukraine’s been reduced to mig 21’s now? what’s next, yak-3’s?
made a mistake
well, they doubled down in the discussion and it is really annoying.
not as annoying as debunking your supposed debunking.
electronic warfare has developed by leaps. most of it is not even revealed to the public. atacms missiles, for example, can be electronically steered to the side from target by the russians. this has been recognized even in the western media. ground units on top of off-road trucks have tremendous electronic data collection capabilities today.
true ! thank you for taking this to the audience. it is so unbelievable that people indeed believe in this obvious propaganda crap southfront is publishing here regarding the war in ukraine. no wonder that putin is still in power & continues sending 100.000s of young christian russians meatwave by meatwave into certain death in ukraine. jewtin – the zombie commander – is only able to convince braindeads – but obviously there is lots of those available to him in this forum & in russia.
more lies from the amerikunt retire janitor
subtle hint: doesn’t the kyiv post have a forum you’d be more comfortable with? maybe the daily stormer?
and this will be the fate of the f-16s
oh, nato is already scared. now back to the reality. how many u.s. drones were already shot down over black sea ? zero. one drone was rammed midair, that’s all putin can do. and another question. is russia really prepared to shot down nato f16 over poland, romania or pribaltics and “trigger” ww3? as f16 will operate from nato airfields. i doubt putin has that balls. because once he will shot down a single jet on nato territory, article 5 will be applied and nobody will ask any questions.
you really believe russia is scared? it’s called restraint something anglos don’t know or care about, russia is ready but in no hurry to escalate ww3.
i don’t believe anything, i only observe here on discussion a lot of brainless wannabe heroes and i know that putin lost 5 years with minsk agreements and other nonsense and that he pooped his pants when prygozhin took voronezh without firing a single bullet. but i ‘m not underestimating russians. they are brave vodka drinkers – and they can fight well once the enemy is 20 km from moscow, especially when the temperature is -50 celsius.
you don’t have the slightest clue about the background of this conflict? angela merkel and francois hollande confessed that they planned the war in ukraine. in the usa, numerous parties have recognized the plan to get russia into the war. simply put: brics is a threat to the value of the $ and € and their ability to impose sanctions
why? because brics got too big. its gdp is higher than the g7 countries, its armed forces are superior (e.g. russia, china, india). it includes most of the world’s natural resources, surface area and population. it is important for the west to weaken russia and china. that’s why they don’t want the war in ukraine to end. that’s why orban is smeared because he wants the war to end. that’s what this is about.
india laughed at us sanctions when india bought s-400 anti-aircraft missiles from russia. it is impossible to impose sanctions against china, its economy is the largest in the world. russia was dragged into the war to weaken it, but the opposite happened, brics made economic growth possible when the eu’s economy collapsed due to its own isolationist policy.
and how did the west get russia to attack in 2022? go through the 2014 events on these pages. how the ethnic ukrainanrussians comprising 1/3 of the ukrainian people were oppressed and killed. until they got tired of being subjugated and declared themselves independent in 2014 (dpr, lpr). ukraine bombed former ukrainanrussian areas until 2022 when russia misled the west with an operation in kiev and was thus able to secure the dpl lpr areas.
you’re clearly a man blessed with cognition.
this is clearly a duel between the two largest nuclear powers on earth. nato’s glove slapped russia, not once and not just twice.
fuck around and find out’s all i can say. i frankly don’t give a damn if it ends in wwiii and neither do i think the russians.
cat’s out of the bag, along with your inner nazi/russophobe. in the earliest days of the russian recovery from the 1990’s predation by the us, they stuck a finger in nato”s eye at pristina airport, and they’ve never backed off an inch since. they don’t have a glorious list of battle honours like the flight from kabul in 2023, but certainly they flung sackashitski up against the wall in georgia.
i clearly remember when that pos wesley clark ordered canada’s michael jackson to attack the russians at pristina airport and jackson told him to go pound sand. last sane thing canada ever did.
president putin has lost nothing. he makes more gains every day thanks to his forward thinking. it’s a shame that the nato proxy army couldn’t get 20 miles away from moscow to test out your theory. the last to try it was prygozhin. that didn’t work out too well. the us and its nato poodles bark more than they can possibly or currently bite. they know it, the brics know it and so does everyone else.
russia did not lose 5 years, owing to france and germany not honouring the minsk ii peace agreement. hato wanted the time to build up the ukraine forces and it suited russia to also build up their forces for what was coming. plus, it showed russia that the west are not ‘agreement compatible’.
amerikunts consume more alcohol than russians
hogwash nothing else
that’s really valid point. but is still does not explain my fundamental question how russian pilot on su35 detected ukraine mig29 over distance 300km with such precision, that he even noticed that this particular mig29 is going to fire antiradar missile and type of the missile as well. but according to the article, russian pilot not only detected the mig29, but he was able to shot him down before mig29 was able to launch his own missile. it only illustrates how desperate is sf propaganda.
just fyi. mig29 has crossection 3-5m. russian aesa radars detect it in 170km but it will make them targets because of nato awacs. it is out of question that russian pilots can use their own radars. mission as described in article is possible, but highly unlikely as it would require meticulous planning, coordination and precision which is beyond russian capabilities. maybe israel can do that but israel would start with shooting down enemy awacs first.
what a foolish man you are. you remind me of that pompous pompeo pile of poop.
as i already said, sf is just a clone of cnn, first creating hoaxes, then doubling down on their own bullshit, when exposed, feeding it down the throat of people and i’m sick of that. call foolish man your trans mother bro
so, why spend so much time commenting on a site that you do not like or believe in? what are the priorities of a nafo troll? discourse, deny, disagree, discredit, deflect – or the strawman – attack views/ideas expressed by the target.
other requirements of a troll/bot. whataboutism – deflect discussion away from target. attack – use brutal language and discourage the opposition. mockery – use sarcasm to belittle the opposition. provocations – who benefits from ‘cui bono’? exhaust – drown opposition in details and technicalities. denial – flat out deny any evidence.
in times when a completely outdated ukrainian patriot air defense is liquidating russian hypersonic missiles, and the same completely outdated ukrainian patriot air defense 25!! from 24!! russian drones, it is also possible to shoot down aircraft at a distance of 200km.
i am already looking forward to ww3, when nato will attack with m3 us launchers from 1968 🤡 😆😆😆
israeli meticulous planning, coordination and precision?
now you’ve really made me break out with a good laugh.
maybe you meant in a genocidal german-like precision way. the first to become abusers are the abused themselves, as the psychological literature has proven time and again.
the isreali apartheid regime cannot even defeat a rag tag army in the midst of their own concentration camp called gaza. the regime is crapping their pants now they have disturbed a hornets nest. quite how the isreali apartheid regime can win anything without support of the usadmin is anyone’s guess?
according to you. what happens if the us, france or the uk decide to nuke russia? the russian air defence system is alerted and without human interaction, the response goes into action. same with the advanced technology that triggered the reaction from the su-35. not rocket science, now is it? unless you are a nafo troll/bot.
you already stated that no airborne radar can detect 3 m2 beyond 175 km, so you’ve already proved yourself to be full of shit, so why do you continue making a fool of yourself?
using the su-35’s electronic control and mechanical additional turn of the irbis-e’s antenna allows the maximum deflection angle of the radar beams to reach a very wide 120°. the radar can track aircraft with a three square meter radar cross section up to 400km away.
you are so brainwashed by the western media that it spills onto the floor from your text. it doesn’t matter which field the plane takes off from, but what airspace it is in and what it does in that airspace. isn’t the west seeking a third world war by escalating the situation? article 5 applies to an attack on a country, not an attack by a nato country itself.
you gave away with the game when you used the standard five eyes bogeyman trope. isn’t it funny how the five eyes are always opposed by a single wicked individual, from muammar gaddafi to manuel noriega to saddam hussein to joseph kony to vladimir putin or any of the kims? thanks for derping.
don’t forget milosevic. nato bombed belgrade to tear kosovo away from serbia yet does the opposite by proxy in ukraine, never mind that unmik after a 2 yr investigation couldn’t even come up with 5,000 fatalities of mixed origins, yet poroshenko killed far more in the donbass.
that alone is enough to tell you that nato is full of shit and not a legitimate organization as advertised.
nato can not win a nuclear war againt russia , are you retarded
riddle me this, but, what is left in the hato toybox to back up article 5? russia, only spends around $75 billion on defence. compare that to the $860 billion that the us spends. however, russia has more n*clear warheads than all of hato combined.
2) russia has hypersonics in active service, which no hato member has. russia has the world’s best air defence system, which hato cannot penetrate. plus, russian industry can easily keep up with demand, whether drones or missiles, unlike any hato member. russia is only using a small amount of their forces and weapons, as the pre-1917 borders return to russia.
russia certainly does not need nor want the pre-1917 borders. your wagon has lost its wheels.
really? is that why the territory that was novorussia, which lenin gifted ukraine, voted to return home to russia and russia accepted the results of their referendum? is that why crimea, which the bolshevik, ukrainian, krushchev gifted to ukraine, back in 1954 held 3 referendums, since 1992, in order to return home to russia.
2) 2014, the last referendum, which again the majority voted to return home to russia, and this time russia agreed. ukraine without borders – have never ratified the borders with russia or belarus, since the fall of the soviet union, back in 1991, in accordance with international law.
3) the reason they could not join nato in 1997 and reasons still stand. same reason they cannot join the eu. even the un has admitted this. guess that means the borders return to pre-bolshevik lenin times, which is prior to 1917.
why not wwiii? once the last ukrainian has bit the bullet, it’ll be time by my reckoning. it’ll be the purge of all purges.
you know the old saying: fuck around and find out.
if ukrainian f-16’s are just flying circles over “poland, romania or pribaltics” why would the russians bother to waste a missile on them? they have no weapons that can reach russian forces from that range. they have to overfly ukraine or the black sea to launch and even if the russians shot down an f-16 over poland what’s going to happen? there’s a better chance that nato would break up than form a grans coalition against russia that could see paris, berlin and rotterdam reduced to ashes.
tak tomu sa povie ďalší z úspešných testov. už vidíte sami na čo je švo dobrá. teraz si treba počkať na tie f16. potom sa môže začať ešte len ten pravý lov. svetu mier!!!
did you ever hear of the phrase suicide by cop? well now the west has invented a new term, suicide by russia.
very clever.
i am broken record–i repeat lies from wiki media and lgbt amerikan often
and the us & their nato lapdogs still don’t understand what they’re dealing with.
up to 300km range is impressive and being hyper adds to the headaches for the nazis, they’ll be crying uncle soon. bring on the f-16’s, russia’s waiting.
when will we see this use on the crappy f16?
soon to a theater near you!