Syrian Army Eliminates Infamous TOW Operator In Northern Hama

i think it just has to do with some latency in registering upticks. In this moment it looks legit for me, 6 pluses and 6 users.

I think it has more to do with the way disqus is working. I appreciate people supporting my view but there’s no obsession about it.

until there is no more and large cats patrol all the alleys and backstreets.

“As long as USA supports Kurds, Erdogan has no other way but seek an alliance with Iran and Russia”

Nope.

Erdogan siding with Russia and Iran is something that has a much more strategic value.

It appears clear by now, what has happened with Turkey:

Zionists lied to them into becoming a main party among those that started the Syrian civil war. Clearly throughout the zionists man in Ankara, PM Davinoglu – one of the most fervent supporters of a Russophobic/Sinophobic policy of expansion of Turkey into mid-Asia.

Only later, Erdogan realized that if Turkey were to fight against Syria for Israeli, US and Saudi interests, the zionist side would have replaced him with Davinoglu, when Turkey would come out and claim the “promises” that the clique made to them before the war.

The “coup”, was probably a desperate attempt at putting Davinoglu in power, after Erdogan received intelligence from Russia and China about the zionist plan.

In addition, Erdogan realized that for Turkey to fluorish economically, the only strategy is to become part of the Chinese silk road – otherwise the country would have been exposed to financial attacks by the likes of Soros and co.

So don’t believe zionist and cryptozionist medias when they try to picture Turkey as a country that will betray his partners at the first occasion. Turkey has won an important battle against this scum, and it’s on course to free itself from them for good.

Because I know how military propaganda works.

In the west especially, there has always been the tendency to create myths about enemy combatants, because, if exercised inside certain limits, this practice gives some advantages.

For example: during the Vietnam war, the US military propaganda invented news about a certain Vietnamese pilot of MiG-17s, dubbed “Colonel Tomb” (Tomb is not even a Vietnamese name).

This “ace”, was credited with like 20 kills of USAF/USN Phantoms.

Now what’s the effect of that?

It gives US pilots an excuse, for when their comrades are shot down in air combat. All of a sudden, where there is a US plane shot down by a Mig, “colonel Tomb” is responsible.

And when it’s needed the most, they give the story a “happy ending”.

In this case, “colonel Tomb” is engaged in an air battle by the USN ace Ritchie Cunningham, who after a lenghty combat, puts a sidewinder in Tomb’s Mig, killing him.

So they create an “american hero” out of the story.

After decades: All North Vietnames air force records of the war, showed that no “colonel Tomb” ever existed. Some NV pilots became aces, with some of them scoring many kills in Mig-17 and 21. Some of them perished, some survived. But on the other side, Richie Cunningham was forever the “American Hero” killing the best NV pilot.

Now, this scheme has been re-used in many other contexts, especially by US/UK subjects.

Another example: during the 80ies, US and UK attack subs patrolled the Northern Sea. The western navies came out with a notice, that the Soviet Northern fleet had a Victor 2 SSN skipper which was incredibly good, and dubbed him “the prince of darkness”.

No one knows if the “prince of darkness” ever existed, but the effect on US and UK submariners was that everytime they were outsmarted by a Soviet sub, they had the excuse they met the “prince of darkness”.

So, I’m not saying that the killing of the raghead missileer is just propaganda, in fact, it’s probably true. But the significance of these single events must be put into the broader context of an entire engagement, if not an entire war.