Click to see full-size image
On June 9th, US President Donald Trump issued a memo ordering a review of the country’s requirements for icebreaking capabilities in the Arctic and Antarctic, with the goal of getting a fleet in place by 2029.
“The Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), shall lead a review of requirements for a polar security icebreaking fleet acquisition program to acquire and employ a suitable fleet of polar security icebreakers, and associated assets and resources, capable of ensuring a persistent United States presence in the Arctic and Antarctic regions in support of national interests and in furtherance of the National Security Strategy and the National Defense Strategy, as appropriate.”
The memo is a bit of a reminder, since three heavy icebreakers are currently being built in the United States, but the remaining ships that aren’t under contract should be reviewed for what can be done to maximize their utility in the frozen poles.
The memo calls for “an assessment of expanded operational capabilities, with estimated associated costs, for both heavy and medium [Polar Security Cutters] not yet contracted for, specifically including the maximum use of any such PSC with respect to its ability to support national security objectives,” which is due in 60 days.
In addition, the memo shows concern of specifically Russia’s capability, as it is the only country that has a fleet of nuclear icebreakers.
“This assessment shall also evaluate defensive armament adequate to defend against threats by near-peer competitors and the potential for nuclear-powered propulsion.”
The memo asks for “use cases in the Arctic that span the full range of national and economic security missions (including the facilitation of resource exploration and exploitation and undersea cable laying and maintenance) that may be executed by a class of medium PSCs, as well as analysis of how these use cases differ with respect to the anticipated use of heavy PSCs for these same activities.
“These use cases shall identify the optimal number and type of polar security icebreakers for ensuring a persistent presence in both the Arctic and, as appropriate, the Antarctic regions.”
Finally, the memo calls for the study to identify two basing locations in the United States for its ice-hardened fleet, as well as two international locations. A study mandated by last year’s National Defense Authorization Act mandated that the Department of Defense study locations for a port in the Arctic.
Click to see full-size image
Alaska’s Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan, who is an advocate for allocating more resources to directed toward the Arctic, said in a statement that Trump’s memo would “add weight” to ongoing efforts to build up the U.S. arctic presence.
“Our adversaries are well ahead of the United States when it comes to Arctic infrastructure,” Sullivan said. “We have one heavy and one medium functioning Polar-class icebreakers, while Russia has more than 50. I have fought for five years to bring Arctic issues to the forefront, including in the FY19 NDAA to authorize the building of six such icebreakers and my bill, the Strategic Arctic Naval Focus Act, to develop the capabilities and basing locations needed to support persistent presence in the Arctic.”
MORE ON THE TOPIC:
With most of the unemployed drug addicted US population on ice, they surely need a ice-breaker.
They continue to present toys, and toys and more toys, perhaps it is better that they stop at the models, when they try to build seriously they only do damage to the Treasury.
Thing is they’re spending our money because our banks still buy their dollars. Some day soon we’ll realise that funding your own subjugation isn’t really such a smart idea and when that happens they’ll get a century of hyperinflation all at once. They should get while the getting’s good because the gravy train won’t last much longer.
When all else fails, they take the country to war. The diabolical monsters that implement US foreign policy know that the majority of the population is either apathetic, extremely naive or just downright dumb. Traurig aber wahr!
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4f36b099c7c8264f62eb0e51d0a7fb3754b4b53024b51bb2b094fe9df82943c0.jpg
The fleet should be up and running by 2050…
Why do we have to turn everything into a fight. It makes sense to have a few ice breakers to rescue shrimp fisherman or oil rig workers in northern Alaska once in a while but now we have visions of fighting pitched battles around Bolshoy Island. We are the most belligerent people on the planet while pretending otherwise … “my bill, the Strategic Arctic Naval Focus Act, to develop the capabilities and basing locations needed to support persistent presence in the Arctic” God forbid that there should be a square inch on this planet that does not have our ‘persistent presence’.
Too late trumpenstein, russias got the arctic down pat