Two U.S.-led coalition Convoys Attacked By Shiite Fighters In Southern, Central Iraq

dream on stupid!

We’ll know in the coming months if I’m dreaming, provided Trump wins.

It is not a plastic soldier chessboard over there, or anyplace else for that matter. I once thought as you have posted here. Eventually and thank Almighty God, a realistic understanding on the situation in many places around the world has come into view.

We are going to be gone dude and civilizations that have been around, families even, for thousands of years will continue to go about their business. We are just a johnny come lately empire and our traces there will fade into the dust. My take on this stuff.

Wet dreams mr. anglo-saxon perverspervert,greedy, paedophile,ugly Snake! Dirty Murika will be wiped out soon by the Angels of Earth! Amen

We’ll know whether I’m lying if Trump wins the election. But if you love the Iranian regime, then pray earnestly that Trump doesn’t win. If he does, it’ll be a miracle for the regime to avoid a war.

amerikans never can occupy—except Grenada….they cower in their military installations

USA can’t afford another large war or invasion (occupation) of Iraq. It would need to certainly introduce a draft system, which given the already high domestic chaos would be a further nail in the coffin. And no EUropean country (potentially only the UK poodle) wants anything to do with another invasion in the middle east – they are all on their own.

The U.S is already an occupying force in Iraq right now. What invasion are you talking about? The invasion already happened, with U.S weapons and soldiers currently on Iraqi soil. Rolling in their tanks from nearby Kuwait is just like reinforcing the forces already in Iraq. Besides, Trump can only do such in his second term – where any opposition wouldn’t mean much. I’m telling you the U.S will crush Iran’s militias in the Middle East if Trump wins a second term.

Not in Estonia. There are no permanent bases, just rotating forces. to have bigger contingent here is dangerous to the Atlantic pact, because it can be taken in blockade in the case of war.

https://4esnok.by/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/suwalkigap.jpg

I don’t see an American invasion in the near future. I do see massive American bombings. The Iraqi army will do the rest. Iraqis understand that the Iranian militias are a cancer. They see what Hezbollah is doing to Lebanon.

The U.S will likely roll in their tanks after degrading the militias from the air. This they’ll do to make sure the job of subduing the militias is done properly.

israel tried to do the same thing ith hezbollah and you know what happen zionist begged US to get Ceasfire in UN with hezbollah. it will samething happen to US bcuz if kuwait /Bahrain or any base in GCC allow US to target iraq and ressitance they will be the target itself. US is pussy if they see large scale attack on them they will back down.

Then it will create more enemy bcuz PMU is withing goverment and attacking them is like attacking goverment. PMU will use antiaircraft missile which they already have . they have bought down many US drone . US will be completly out of the region .if US think of attacking any large popultaion. US troop will go in body bags in large scale. bcuz REssitance knows US force station but US force doesnt know every place where ressitance is there.

You have no knowledge of what Iraq will do. US Government is predictable, Iraq, not so much. There is this interesting little detail, about Iraq. It recently requested a military alliance with Russia. This request was accecpted, a trade alliance was also arraigned. It was suggested that seeking military alliances with it’s neighboring countries may be to Iraq’s liking. Iraq followed up on the suggestion, alliances were formed. Cooperation was instant, and trade between Iraq, and the regional military power surged. US Government is acutely aware of these recent alliances, although you may not be. These events have changed the dynamic in Iraq, and the Middle East. US Government knows beyond a reasonable doubt it’s military cannot defeat Iran in conventional war. It has not the wherewithal to prosecute war against Iran, and then occupy the country should it prevail. US military cannot get what is necessary. US Government has been advised by Russia, (a very strong world power) against the use of nuclear weapons. Any launch of a nuclear weapon towards Russia, or it’s allies will bring an immediate response to attack 7 locations inside US borders, and any, or all the US military nuclear weapons launch sites in Europe. Russia named the 7 locations in US it will strike. Using hypersonic weapons, that are stationed within 200 miles of both US coasts, now. It is, of course known there is no analog anywhere in the world currently for Russia’s hypersonic weapons. Russian submarines are very difficult for Western military to track at this time. Russia also advised there should be minimal collateral damage to the targets in US. Being military facilities that have little to no civilian infrastructure nearby. Russia stated an obligatory disclaimer on the matter of collateral damage in Europe, saying that given the proximity to civilian infrastructure the US military missile batteries were located moderate to high collateral damage should be expected. Further, Russia accecpted no responsibility for and damage as the country hosting these sites knew how close to civilian infrastructure they are when they allowed them to be placed there. Fair enough. At worst, collateral damage will be far less than is caused by US military attacks on targets even close to civilian infrastructure, which US military deliberately attacks, and has a long ass history of attacking civilian infrastructure, and populations. It’s become the trademark of US/NATO military forces. Despite US Government bluff, and bluster, and lunatic behavior in general, it knows, (or at least The Pentagon does) should it choose to attack Iran, or Russia it will have its ass handed to it. Quickly. US military can expect to lose all it’s assets, as old, and maintenance deferred as they are writhin the range of Russian Tu-160 strategic bombers, and long range MiG-31 fighters. (they’re capable of carrying hypersonic weapons and are the perfect escorts for the fast bombers. F-35 can’t flee fast enough to avoid an attack, or to intercept a bomber that’s twice as fast as it is. There aren’t sufficient numbers of F-22 to begin braying about, it’s F-16, and F/A-18 that won’t really have much chance to do anything about the bombers, or a place to land. Those that survive. Hypersonic weapons aren’t the only weapons systems Russia has in service that have no analog. Nobody wants to hear about how big US military is. Russian military is smaller only in figher aircraft, and aircraft carriers. Russia has a smaller on duty size force, but has bigger reserve forces, making the numbers about even. WWII, Germany had the smallest military in 1939, 17 million men, Wehrmacht was 90% horse drawn. You do the math on the total number of allied forces, then add the Russian military to that. US military had 10% of it’s military in the Pacific Theatre. It was Russia that won the war in the European theatre for the allies. Then US stole the credit. Russia has Spetsnaz, the West does not. Still, I think US Government will attack. Unless Russia takes the correct decision, and takes the initiative. There would be far less destruction in that way. As Putin said, “When one is in a street fight, and outnumbered, and there is going to be a fight. It’s very important that you strike first.” Some US Civil War General said, “The one that gets there the firstest with the mostest wins.”

Much of what you say about Russia’s military capability is true, but that doesn’t mean Russia will risk nuclear war by trying to protect Iran. The chances of Russia physically fighting the U.S over Iran is absolutely ZERO. If you doubt me because I’m no fan of Iran, then go ask The Saker – one of the staunchest pro-Russian Iranian supporters out there. His website is, “thesaker.is” Secondly, your claim that the U.S doesn’t want a war with Iran is totally false. How can a country avoiding war assassinate the top military leader of its adversary while being in close proximity to that adversary?That’ll be completely illogical. It is the other way round. Iran is the one avoiding a war. Just of recent, Rouhani said NO COUNTRY CAN IMPOSE WAR ON IRAN. What this means is that Iran isn’t going to take the bait of America to start this war. Similarly, the top Iranian general heading the IRGC warned that Iran will occupy U.S bases should it be forced in a way.

For both Rouhani and the IRGC general, they perceive someone is trying to draw them into a war. There is no such person except Trump and his crowd.

No, not autistic. Think along asymetrical lines and you will get what I meant. If that doesn´t work, think about the 3 things an army needs to exist: B, B and B. That is the angle the atttacks are coming from.

I read your stuff.

These pin prick attacks are so ” powerful ” that they destroy a couple of tires and nothing else, not to mention they attack trucks driven by Iraqis with no US troops present. If you think they’re real you’re fooling yourself.

You still don´t get it. Don´t worry about it. It will sink in over time.

Save your breath.

For you, hardly but, there is hope.

What else to expect as an answer in Fog of War

its trade. give some get some. as long as both are happy, its all good. none of 3rd party business, specially Gremlin:))))

:))))) oki