Written by Ahmed Adel, Cairo-based geopolitics and political economy researcher
The United States is unlikely to help South Korea build nuclear-powered submarines at the moment as it is burdened by AUKUS commitments to Australia, the Pentagon said on Saturday, as cited by Reuters. This is a major blow to President Yoon Suk-yeol’s efforts to globalise South Korea, which has come at the cost of prosperous relations with Russia.
Asked during the Shangri-La Dialogue security summit in Singapore how he would respond to a direct request from South Korea for help in obtaining nuclear submarines, Lloyd Austin, the US Secretary of Defense, said it would be “very, very difficult” for Washington to accommodate that “on top of what we do right now.”
“(AUKUS) is no small endeavour,” he said. “We just started down this path with Australia. (It’s) highly doubtful that we could take on another initiative of this type anytime in the near future.”
In 2021, the United States signed the AUKUS pact with the United Kingdom and Australia to share nuclear-powered submarine technology and sell at least three Virginia-class boats to Australia by the 2030s. The two-stage security pact seeks to neutralise China’s growing power in the Asia-Pacific region and will be the first time Washington has shared nuclear propulsion technology since it did so with the UK in the 1950s.
“We believe that AUKUS is, in fact, a good addition to regional security,” said Judith Collins, New Zealand’s Defence Minister, on May 30, on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security summit. This demonstrates that the Anglo world is united in the efforts of AUKUS, even New Zealand, which, despite being a South Pacific country, has not yet joined the bloc.
Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles said that he could imagine other countries’ involvement in the future but stressed that the focus, for now, was on the US-UK-Australia trio getting “runs on the board” of submarine projects, which are set to last decades.
In effect, Austin and Marles confirmed that AUKUS is an Asia-Pacific Anglo alliance that has no room for Asians, even for South Korea, a country that has followed the US in imposing sanctions on Russia and has provided weapons to Ukraine through indirect methods, as confirmed by the Washington Post in December 2023.
Yet, despite Washington evidently prioritising Anglo allies over Asian counterparts, including QUAD partners India and Japan, South Korea continues to deepen its security partnership with the US. The defence ministers of the US, South Korea, and Japan agreed on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue on June 2 to hold the inaugural Freedom Edge military exercises, which are expected to include naval, aerial, underwater and cyber exercises and to take place sometime in the summer.
According to a Pentagon press release, the three defence ministers “stressed the importance of the rules-based international order and reaffirmed their commitment to stand with Ukraine” whilst also affirming their “enduring commitment to strengthen trilateral security cooperation to deter nuclear and missile threats” posed by North Korea and the “dangerous and aggressive” Chinese “behaviour” in the South China Sea.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov criticised Washington’s joint drills with its Asian partners on May 20, highlighting that they were aggravating the delicate security situation in the Asia-Pacific region “to the point of its transition to a hot phase.”
Lavrov added that North Korea has “recently expressed its gravest concern over provocative actions by the United States and its allies in this region.”
President Yoon Suk-yeol’s “global pivotal state” strategy aims to transform South Korea from a middle power to a global influencer by broadening the country’s military, economic, and diplomatic outreach beyond the region. However, these efforts to broaden South Korea’s outreach have meant severing prosperous relations with Moscow to align with Washington – all this while the majority of the world is only deepening its ties with Russia.
In fact, Suk-yeol’s actions have meant that South Korea, along with Japan and Singapore, is the only non-Western country to have imposed sanctions on Moscow. Instead of globalising South Korea’s appeal, Suk-yeol’s has made his country a pariah state since the majority of the world has not imposed US-led sanctions.
Although Suk-yeol’s actions have strained ties with Moscow, there has been no tangible result besides trilateral exercises with the US and Japan, which are not at the strategic level or value of QUAD, let alone AUKUS. The most obvious signal that South Korea is seen as nothing more than a vassal for Washington is the confirmation that there will be no assistance in building nuclear-powered submarines, which also serves as an indication that the US will always prioritise its ties with the Anglo world.
MORE ON THE TOPIC:
- On The Human Rights Situation In The United States Of America – Report оf The Ministry Of Foreign Affairs Of The Russian Federation
- March Madness: The United States And The Real Estate Bubble Ready To Explode Globally
- Planning The Aftermath, Rand Corporation Evokes A Nuclear Clash Between Russia, China And The United States
well then macron should offer the deal he had with autralia before the us kicked the french out now to south korea. nonnuclear but better then nothing.
better? what better about any of this?
usa help me with tranny surgery—nice amerikan surgeon remove my gonads–make me plastic clit
somehow the usa was put on the take over the world bandwagon with uk and now the aussies. at a build rate of 1.3 per year with 4 virginia class going down under the usa can hardly get them themselves.
modern generation of weapon is too complicated, expensive and thus low in numbers. you can see lower temps of building everywhere, may be except china. s.korea could build any vessel at own shipyards, so it doesn’t influence terms of pentagon’s shipbuilding program, but number possible of nuclear submarines could be 3 times lower than diesel-electric. does it help them, if to build 3-4 nuclear ones instead of 10-12 diesel at the same cost?
remain france or russia…. or to work hard to make their own.
one humiliation after another and more to come. macron could propose french assistance, but i guess when the contract will be ready to sign, yanks will steal this deal as previous one with australia or another one with swiss to buy f-35 instead “rafale”. micron – another pity minion of fashington.
ha, nobody who ever allied with the us ever came out ahead of the game. sucker punched all.
more like illuminati
let me guess, the us is going to help taiwan build them instead… muhahahaha… too many anti-usa protests and racist attacks on us troops in south korea, the nice guy honeymoon is over bitches…
there should be anti-illuminati protest.
its sould be said more crrolectly that us and all its vessles is actully an illumnati vesslez, but evryone knows that by now
whos the cun/t jew who keeps blocking comments?
yoon suk-yeol is a despicable yankee wannabe.