0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
1,800 $
6 DAYS LEFT UNTIL THE END OF DECEMBER

Why Are ‘Sensitive US Nuclear Technologies’ In Ukraine?

Support SouthFront

Why Are 'Sensitive US Nuclear Technologies' In Ukraine?

Illustrative Image

CNN admits that the “sensitive US nuclear technologies” in question “could be used in a way that undermines US national security interests”, which is disturbingly similar to earlier US claims about the so-called “biological research labs”.

Written by Drago Bosnic, independent geopolitical and military analyst

When talking about various reasons as to why Russia launched its counteroffensive against NATO aggression in Europe the points usually revolve around historical and strategic/geopolitical aspects of the Ukrainian conflict. And while those points certainly stand regardless, there are other crucial reasons, almost entirely overlooked or even censored by mainstream media. One of those is the aspect of NBC (nuclear, biological, chemical) weapons in Ukraine, all of which fall under the category of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs).

The topic of “biological research facilities”, as infamous neocon warmonger Victoria Nuland ever so euphemistically put it, received a significant amount of attention from media around the world, while the mainstream propaganda machine tried suppressing it. On the other hand, by far the most overlooked aspect of the Ukrainian conflict has been the covert transfer of US nuclear technologies to the Neo-Nazi junta. CNN, the infamous US neoliberal mouthpiece, was the first major mainstream propaganda outlet that broke the story last week.

According to the report, Washington DC has “sensitive nuclear technologies” in at least one (former) Ukrainian nuclear power plant (NPP). CNN claims that “the US has already warned Russia not to touch them”, citing a letter Department of Energy (DoE) allegedly sent to Moscow’s Rosatom corporation. CNN supposedly reviewed the letter (dated March 17) in which the director of DoE’s Office of Nonproliferation Policy, Andrea Ferkile, told Rosatom that the Zaporozhye NPP in Energodar “contains US-origin nuclear technical data that is export-controlled by the United States Government”.

Firstly, the idea that Russia is in any way intimidated by a third-rate US bureaucrat who allegedly “ordered it not to touch anything” is simply absurd. Secondly, both Washington DC and its Kiev puppets are parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which means that transferring “sensitive nuclear technologies” to the Neo-Nazi junta is a direct violation of that agreement. Worse yet, the US is now (supposedly) threatening Russia through a director of its Office of Nonproliferation Policy, an institution that was supposed to prevent “sensitive US nuclear technologies” from ever reaching Ukraine.

This blatant hypocrisy is only matched by the sheer magnitude of US irresponsibility and WWIII brinkmanship for even considering the possibility to transfer such technologies to an unstable, genocidal and deeply corrupt regime in the middle of a direct confrontation with a nuclear-armed superpower next door. What’s more, CNN admits that the “sensitive US nuclear technologies” in question “could be used in a way that undermines US national security interests”. Once again, this is disturbingly similar to US claims about the so-called “biological research labs”.

“It is unlawful under United States law for non-authorized persons, including, but not limited to, Russian citizens and Russian entities such as Rosatom and its subsidiaries, to knowingly and willfully access, possess, control, export, store, seize, review, re-export, ship, transfer, copy, manipulate such technology or technical data, or direct, or authorize others to do the same, without such Russian entities becoming authorized recipients by the Secretary of the US Department of Energy,” the alleged letter reads.

Once again, the US is trying to enforce the self-proclaimed exterritoriality of its laws. However, in the case of Russia, this practice is not only legally void, but is also impossible to implement, especially after the city of Energodar and the Zaporozhye oblast (region) where the homonymous NPP is situated voted to join Russia last year. Obviously, CNN’s motivation to report the story was anything but altruistic, as it revolved around an attempt to portray US “demands” to Russia as anything more than a laughing matter to Moscow.

However, what surely isn’t a laughing matter is the seriousness of Russia’s approach to the situation. And for good reason, given the fact that the Kiev regime boasted about its intentions to acquire nuclear weapons nearly a decade before the start of the SMO (special military operation). As early as March 2014 and as late as February 2022, the Neo-Nazi junta has been openly declaring its intention to get WMDs, specifically nuclear weapons, to say nothing of the constant grumbling of many Kiev regime politicians about how they “made a big mistake for giving up on nuclear weapons in 1994”.

This only shows their lack of knowledge on the subject, as Ukraine itself never actually had nuclear weapons, because all those deployed there were Russian-made/controlled. However, this doesn’t stop the Neo-Nazi junta from claiming this Soviet/Russian legacy as its own, despite rabidly Russophobic disdain for all things Soviet. Another important segment of Russian legacy they were happy to harness is its world-class missile technology that Kiev is using to produce strike weapons with possible nuclear warheads to target major Russian cities, including Moscow.

Although Russian air defenses have been successful in downing such missiles, the Neo-Nazi junta could still use other Soviet legacy assets to target the Eurasian giant. Or worse yet, these could be provided by the US/NATO or any of its vassals and satellite states. The fact that the Kiev regime never publicly renounced its intention to acquire nuclear weapons that could be used to arm such missiles is quite telling. It’s also yet another confirmation that Russia’s SMO was the only way to prevent the Neo-Nazi junta from going ahead with its plans. And even if such guarantees were ever given, with the diplomatic scandal surrounding EU/NATO lies about the Minsk agreements, Moscow could hardly ever take them seriously.

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Erik Nielsen

Kremlin are doing what they are being told as they are the good cop, as they are also Europeans and always wanted to be equal partners with US and its Allies who are acting as the bad cop.

hash
hashed
Madam Defarge

Why is “sensitive” anything present in Ukraine? Perhaps the US is planning to “adopt” Ukraine as their 51st state.

hash
hashed
Hans Richardt

Why is NO steps taken against Victoria Nuland or Sloppy Joe Biden regarding WMD?

hash
failed
fuckUk

callate gran marico hijo de la siete leches, tu con tu pelo verde y tu supositorio de fentanil y tus gustos sexuales (niños y animales) eres mas peligroso, ve a que una ballena te coja por esa tronera.

Thoughtful

LONG comments are too long for the system on here to accept, when I made longer comments, so I do not get why other excessvely long comments. those ones filled with trash, how can they get onto here?

Something else which I do not GET is what America is saying about its ‘sensitive nuclear technologies’, in this power station? Is the nuclear radiation at all different? Is there something hiding or something hiding in plain site or some alternative nuclear technology? Russia DO look into this. What is this ‘US-origin nuclear technical data that is export-controlled’? . Do any of the workers at this plant have any idea what the US is getting at? Are there plans to use the spent radioactive fuel or are there enriched or weapons grade nuclear products here? Are there enrichment facilities or technologies here?

hash
hashed
David Parker

The real question is WHAT are these secret US nuclear facilities? A plutonium breeder? U-235 enrichment? All the things Iran was being accused of to prevent Iran arming themselves as Israel was allowed to do, as if a Muslim bomb is any more dangerous than the Israeli arsenal of some 400 nuclear weapons, undoubtedly some already in US cities waiting for MOSSAD’s next false flag event?

hash
hashed
Last edited 1 year ago by David Parker
10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x