Written by Damir Nazarov
The last UN Summit in New York, thanks to the friends of Palestine, was largely devoted to discussing the genocide in Gaza staged by the Zionists. However, behind the scenes, the main topic was a series of meetings that mark positive signals within the Islamic World, which promises good news for the Palestinians.
Two landmark meetings took place on the sidelines of the UN, first Iraqi Prime Minister Muhammad Shia al-Sudani met with Prime Minister of the Federal Republic of Somalia Hamza Abdi Barre, and then a day later al-Sudani had a warm conversation with Erdogan. What do these meetings mean? Turkey invites Iran to broader cooperation, where Somalia is chosen as the new assembly point.
Somalia has long been chosen by Turkey to expand its military and political influence. Behind Turkish ambitions is China with its Silk Road project. Somalia has long been chosen by Turkey to expand its military and political influence. Behind Turkish ambitions is China with its Silk Road project. Turkey’s military base in Somalia allows China to control the sea routes and secure the shipping of countries in a strategic alliance with The Celestial Empire.
What does Iran have to do with it? The fact is that Muhammad al-Sudani is a figure of compromise from Iran and the United States to maintain the stabilization of Iraq, but Iranian opinion plays a decisive role on who will be the prime minister of the Iraqi republic. Accordingly, any foreign policy activity of the Iraqi Prime Minister has been coordinated with Tehran in advance. With regard to Iraq’s interaction with Turkey, positive signals are coming from Iran in many ways. Although there are a number of small problems associated with populism on the part of some leaders of the resistance factions (Asaib al-Haq, Kataeb Hezbollah), which strengthen anti-Turkish sentiments and in recent months have launched a campaign to undermine the prime minister’s chair of Muhammad al-Sudani. In general, Tehran is aware of what is happening and does not want to escalate the situation. The Iranians understand that any conflict situation inside Iraq, and especially Iraqis with Turks, can prevent the establishment of railways, highways and ports through Iraq to Turkey, which is part of the Silk Road.
As for Somalia, the dialogue on strengthening bilateral relations between Iraq and the main country of the Horn of Africa is in some way intended to expand cooperation between Ankara and Tehran. After all, any military-technical aspects between Iraq and other countries mean the presence of pro-Iranian elements from Iraq. Therefore, do not be surprised if you hear that Hashad al-Shaabi forces were seen in the Federal Republic of Somalia, which were created by the IRGC forces back in 2013 under the first name Hashad al-Difa. The Popular Mobilization Forces are the same institution of Iraqi security as the official army and the federal police. Members of Hashad al-Shaabi were seen on an “internship” in Egypt and collaborate with Turkey, thereby demonstrating a desire for international cooperation. Thus, any conclusion of agreements on common security and military cooperation will mean that PMU representatives will travel to Somalia to train local security agencies.
Iran’s role on the Silk Road is beyond doubt, but isolation from the outside world is still at a high level, and the new president of the Islamic Republic is ready to solve this problem. From Beijing’s point of view, mutual understanding, even through intermediaries, should pave the way for more comprehensive cooperation between the main components of the Silk Road, and for the Ummah(Islamic World), such progress in key countries opens up new opportunities to solve accumulated problems.
Distrust of Turkey remains within Iran and Iraq, largely due to Turkey’s membership in NATO. For the conservative circles of the Islamic Republic and the factions of the resistance of Iraq, the argument about Turkey’s “peculiar membership” in the Western Atlantic military alliance, which allows Ankara to pursue an independent policy, seems insufficient. But on the other hand, the efforts of Erdogan and his party to eliminate Kemalism through an “internal revolution” have a positive effect on most of the Iranian establishment.
Of course, all barriers to the establishment of the Silk Road will be eliminated, the whole question is, “how soon will they be eliminated?”
MORE ON THE TOPIC:
i am stupid turk, and i like rapes, shoot dogs, disco dansing, and ping pong.
erdoganistan is a zionist nato trojan horse and part of the “axis of assistance” (meaning assistance to israel) which is just waiting anxiously for zionists to win their war so they can instantly go back to enjoying that jewish money, they hate that they are made to be ashamed of taking zionist bribes. how the hell are turkish or iranian troops in somalia going to benefit palestinians? this is just a distraction.
erdoganian turkie, hashemite jordan and saudi arabia, uae, azerbaijan, egypt, morocco are all part of axis of assistance (to israel). and thus in contrast to axis of resistance.
“there are a number of small problems associated with populism on the part of some leaders of the resistance factions (asaib al-haq, kataeb hezbollah), which strengthen anti-turkish sentiments…” i am fascinated that you blame actual resistance for “populism” and not blame erdoganistan for being a collaborationist! iraqi resistance factions simply accept the hard and plainly obvious truth! turkey is not their friend, erdoganistan has no friends, only useful idiots.
posturing. unfortunately the palestinians will never have their own country and land, the eu, us and uk will never allow that to happen.
pmu is not a legitimate iraqi military force. it should come under government control to be legitimate. it’s just another hezbollah scheming to swallow the iraqi state.
as for distructing turkiye, this is typical shiite propaganda. you don’t distrust turkey. you hate turkey. and not because of nato. but because it’s a powerful sunni country that threatens iran’s decades of effort to win minds in the muslim world. erdogan is the biggest threat to iran’s influence in the muslim world.
now that war is staring iran in the face, it remembers that cooperating with turkey is a good thing. i think it’s too late. erdogan will not come to iran’s rescue … not after what the mullahs and their network of terrorist proxies did to sunnis in syria and iraq. i’m convinced israel is determined to drag iran into a major war. and it seems iran has now given netanyahu the excuse he needs. iran’s symbollic missile strike may well be the spark that ignites this conflict.
assuming israel obliterates the bulk of iran’s oil or nuclear facilities? the mullahs will be under intense domestic pressure to retaliate. they are foreseeing this situation, which is why iran’s foreign minister tried to bully gulf arab states into stopping israel from doing that. it remains to be seen whether netanyahu will listen to them. but from recent trend of events, i think he won’t back down.
doubtful anybody but armenians hate turkiye
i frequently see ramses krazy tratz saxon in my gay amerikant bar
partly true–future not known. recklessness can create unpredictable results
turkey is realizing that it is in their interest to see greater muslim unity in the region; improving business trade and security for all players. which is what iran wants. as opposed to giving into israel’s expansionist ambitions which will eventually hurt the sunni emirates, turkey, pakistan — and the whole world. we are seeing a glimpse of what jews do with power: it’s an ethnocentrism and ethno-supremacy belief system on steroids —-weaponized against all non-jews.
indian times today claimed that, the recent terror attact in israel, was maded by erdogan’s order via turkish secret service mit s help. the terrorists gets explosive education in turkey and sended back to israel. people also talks that erdogan’s wife is arab and thats why erdogan hate israel and helping the arab terrorists. turkey as a nato member may be put outside if trump wins, and turkey s place can be fill with israel.