The national flag of New Zealand flies at half mast after Friday’s mosque attacks in Christchurch. IMAGE: Reuters / Jorge Silva
Video footage of killer Brenton Tarrant’s shooting spree at a Christchurch mosque on Friday – which left 50 worshippers dead – was pulled from Facebook immediately after the massacre. With the footage proliferating on several hosting platforms afterwards, the Kiwi authorities have already charged an 18-year-old man for sharing the video, as well as for posting other “objectionable” comments days before the shooting.
The teenager faces up to ten years in prison, under New Zealand’s ‘objectionable and restricted material’ laws. Police have meanwhile issued an overt threat to anyone else looking for the video.
“Do not download it. Do not share it. If you are found to have a copy of the video or to have shared it, you face fines & potential imprisonment,” read a statement from the police via local news source Wellington Live.
?New Zealanders threatened with 10 YEARS IN JAIL if they have the shooting video. ?
"Anybody found “knowingly” in possession of objectionable material can receive a maximum of 10 years imprisonment."
14 YEARS IN JAIL if you are a "dealer" of the video https://t.co/ZIlKtsUaKt pic.twitter.com/Jus4VLUvZB
— Nick Monroe (@nickmon1112) March 16, 2019
Under the objectionable material laws, corporations can be fined up to NZ$200,000 (US$173,000) for sharing the video or any related content. Unsurprisingly, New Zealand’s Internet Service Providers rushed to ban websites suspected of sharing the shooting-related materials since the tragedy.
We've started temporarily blocking a number of sites that are hosting footage of Friday’s terrorist attack in Christchurch. We understand this may inconvenience some legitimate users of these sites, but these are extreme circumstances and we feel this is the right thing to do.
— Telstra News (@Telstra_news) March 18, 2019
Reports from internet users across New Zealand say that 8chan – the site on which Tarrant announced his attack and posted links to his white nationalist manifesto – has been banned. Social discussion service Dissenter has also been banned, as has content sharing platform Bitchute. In neighboring Australia, ISPs have reportedly banned “cesspool of the internet,” 4chan.
Getting reports that New Zealand ISPs have banned https://t.co/3NwGyCZbgI until it is “censorship compliant,” despite the fact that Dissenter was in no way involved with this week’s tragic events in NZ. pic.twitter.com/IbL3s0gp1D
— Dissenter.com is ? by Gab (@getongab) March 16, 2019
Trolls and memers attempting to access Bitchute and 4chan were greeted with an Interpol notice warning that the sites in question are “distributing child sexual abuse material.”
I just got this trying to visit 4chan from Australia on a @Kogan (vodaphone reseller) connection.
It seems anything listed on https://t.co/3ErcoHowGY is being blanket shut down & anyone that tries to visit is labelled a kiddy diddler. pic.twitter.com/R9IeHOJCj6
— Davey G (@Goldsteinm8ty) March 18, 2019
Popular video sharing site LiveLeak has also been reportedly blocked – although its moderators explicitly said in a statement that they would not allow the live video of the shooting to be shared there.
Why did they ban liveleak in new zealand. They won’t even show the christchurch video. Ironically they’re one of the better sites when it comes to deplatforming shit like that pic.twitter.com/oqI8xJIUEk
— dehd (@WienerLover39) March 18, 2019
It was a fake – and since the liveleak shows that it was a fake, they censored it. So what, they do that that always – was the same with the cut throat video of the Danish and Norewegian girls in Morocco. It also was a different story – different girl, different place. When they use fakes like these, then they have to hide them…
I am dane. So tell me why their families hasnt seen them since..IDDDIJOT.
We should crusify someone like You with the head down comming with this.
You are lucky you aren’t near by so we could test our Nato honed skills. Were you are at the funeral (?) – how do you know ist’s not the same freemason fake like master Breivik pulled in your wonderful totally corrupt Nato-Norway. One should hang you upside down till maybe your brain functions again, because shurely it was a fake. It even uses the same typ of mad manifesto like freemason diplomats son Breivik…
Can you proof it was fake, what made you convince it was fake?
And about the girls in morocco, Where are they then? And just because the MSM never get the facts straight, does not mean it didn not happen.
I don’t know where the girls in Morocco are, but the place where they where camping most certainly didn’t have a concrete floor. Most likely they where murdered, but the disguisting video couldn’t have shown that murder, and therefore because of inconsistensies the video was censored. Same thing here, he fires shoot’s – but there is no blood, only when the camera comes back, then there is blood. Same with the shooter, where did he get his guns, where did he get his car, how could he travels all over the show – even in and out of Israel.
‘Undeniable Proof: CGI Used in New Zealand Shooting’ https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/03/18/undeniable-proof-cgi-used-in-new-zealand-shooting/
Lots off evidence to prove elements are faked. I can’t paste links on my phone in disqus for some reason so I provide the title. Go search it on YouTube and also veteranstoday.com do a few articles with some well researched intelligence on the shooter and possible motives. I suggest you go do some reading and watching and get educated.. The title of the magically disappearing bullet casings is … magically disappearing cartridges!new Zealand shooter.
I don’t know if it was fake but it was definitely a false flag, here’s the proof:
1. At 6:53 into the video you can clearly see a rifle magazine that was preplanted for him on the ground in the mosque. He picks up that same clip at around the 8:30 mark.
2. After the 14 minute mark he’s having a conversation with a second person who is in the car with him.
3. All initial reports from the prime minister to head of police to the media repeatedly stated that 3 other people have been arrested with at least 2 being directly related to the incident yet they have so far failed to provide any additional info.
The reason they are trying to hard to remove the video is so that people can’t verify what I wrote in this comment.
I have a copy of the video and his manifesto stored in the cloud and on various file storage websites and on removable devices should the need to recirculate this to keep it to remind future generations how government’s and the elite lie and decieve us so they can achieve their agendas at the time.
What I don’t understand is why they keep making such amateurish mistakes and giving away their hands to us every time. In every false flag you can find such bloopers. Are they really that incompetent or it is part of their perverted belief system that they must give us some chance to figure out the truth. I have heard both theories before. I mean there was absolutely no reason to place a rifle magazine on the ground in advance. The shooter is clearly aware that the magazine is there as he briefly takes a look at it as he’s entering the main mosque floor.
These terrorist attacks don’t happen without a support network. One unemployed, uneducated marginalized crazed individual like the Australian nutcase could not have done it without funding from organized sources. In Europe, the Zionists openly support PEGIDA and other alt-right racist groups.
In Europe the Zionists are the goverments themselves. They support and found the left, and there are other Zionists which support the right. So there is nothing new there, same old – same old. But lukely this was, like most of the others -where muslims played the terrorists- a fake, like ISIS is Nato/Mossad false flag venture. And Yes it’s not just a lone unemployed uneducated marginalized crazed individual-it’s the Newseeland intelligence organisations, together with the Newseeland police, who has done it. And those coppers must have known that they are part of a fake – and they all need to be shot for high treason…
Interesting points, thanks for pointing that out. But if you can edit casings in, you can also edit them out. Im not saying it was fake/staged or real, im just pointing out that faking goes both ways.
All those who where alledgely killed, they must still be alive then, how are you going to silence them, and they have friends that cant keep shut. so in the end hundreds if not thousands of people can say its fake, and their proof?; they are still alive.
That is what i dont get with all these episodes, where does the “victims” go? They cant go home or show themselves in public ever again, and their families and friends are ok with faking their funeral, bank accounts gets closed, kids being adopted away etc.
Or are every single person in these videoes paid actors willing to loose their life and kids for a single paid gig? If they are i refer to the second section in this reply.
False flag? Now that is a way more possible reason, flase flag operations allways have a deeper impact than “the real thing”, having an entire machinery behind them to utilise every fear for whatever purpose the flase flag was created for.
What i think speaks for a false flag is is the extremes they go to to hide the video.
But in the end, technology is a two edges sword, and i only believe what i have experienced my self, it was easier back in “the old days”
Just to add to this. VT also did an article about programs that are able to produce fake photos using famous people morphed with others and video software too
JAILS????? BLA HA HA HA their JAILS are like our Hilton Hotels EMPTY and with real food, and good services.
We certainly is not like You. We was having bad results as You. Therefore many today are much different, because we by other methods also have better results.
We prevent much crime and especially the “doing it again and agian” and when they are released wy try harder to join them again into being good taxpayers. It do payes off even we also often dont parts of that version as well and are with You.
As much as I am against this terror attack, I am also against this ban. Why should they filter it? It doesn’t go away by blocking the websites. What’s in it (besides the obvious attack) that they don’t want people to see it? And with such sever punishment, really? Up to 10 years in jail for a video. I wonder if they were against the ISIS videos with such resolution. The more you prevent the humans to do something, the more we want to absolutely do it. This kind of reaction turns the terrorist into a hero, perhaps that’s what they want.
And now a rant to the people who think he did a right thing. In my opinion you are wrong, because Muslims in your countries are not the cause of your concern, but an effect. If you want they don’t come, then stop your governments from destroying their countries and besides, you are more than welcomed to deal with the source of “replacement”. Show your prowess by fighting ISIS, Saudi backers and US enablers (like we do), you won’t save your own countries by murdering a bunch of unarmed and praying men, women and children. A couple more of these attacks and the victims inevitably react. Then when they (and I mean average civilian Muslims, not ISIS/AQ or other Wahhabi elements under US/Zionists guidance) do something which they normally don’t, you can point fingers and say “Told ya’!”.
New Zealand has been on a rampage to disarm its citizens because criminals are found to [shocked face] use or possess guns. More restrictive gun ownership laws will force gun-toting criminals to acknowledge the danger their illegal guns pose and (I guess) they’ll stop buying and using them.
The video(s), fake or not, were so aggressively censored by NZ because one cannot get the idea out of their mind about a citizen’s complete and utter helplessness when faced by an armed criminal. NZ citizens might get the idea that a well-armed, intrusive surveillance state is unable to protect them, and that citizens must arm and protect themselves. Best to prevent dangerous thoughts like that among your citizenry.
Only the state and terrorists/criminals can have guns. Being slaughtered by madmen is a price the citizens must pay for safety!
Normally appreciate your posts Paveway, but on this occasion I think you are misreading the situation.
The shooter with no name posted the video to make a point. The video is being eliminated so that point may not be made. A secondary reason is as per Jens, that others do copy behaviour, and we do not want anyone inspired or encouraged by such imagery.
The firearms debate centres around MSSA’s. Why do citizens need MSSA’s? Recreational shooting remains popular, and farmers use semi-autos for rabbit control, but no serious hunter needs a MSSA for deer shooting (or thar or chamois). For this bigger game a single shot with range, accuracy and a sports round is whats required, especially on “the tops” (above the tree line).
NZers feel no need to protect themselves from their government. Soldiers and police are NZers first, government employees second. This attitude pervades our society – a strong sense of national identity. It is exemplified by a gang performing a haka as a sign of respect to the Muslim community in Wellington, and another gang offering protection of a mosque in Hamilton. NZers first, any other distinction is secondary. I am not sure how that compares with other nations, but thats how we are, and will remain.
Appreciate your perspective, Lobjidutu. I guess that’s why I also see a different ‘point’ being made by the gunman than others (in NZ or not) are seeing.
To me, the point of the video was to terrorize people the shooter hates and doesn’t want in NZ – “This can happen to you – get out”. Simple psychopathy – terrorism is about controlling other people for the psychopath’s imagined benefit. Well, it CAN happen to you – in NZ too. Awareness and rejection of the homicidal intimidation seems appropriate. ‘Shielding people’ from the possibility or choice to see the video is appropriate for children, not for adults.
Most of the other explanations for the video’s intent seem to center around a secondary characteristic of psychopaths: exploit the ‘help’ of others by contriving a common enemy that is causing all the problems in the world and must be opposed. Demonize the ‘enemy’ and exploit your unwitting allies for your benefit. Sacrifice someone helping to destroy that enemy, then tout them as a hero and martyr.
Unless there’s some other video, the one I saw does nothing towards that end and cannot possibly imagine the intent was to loinize the shooter or his ’cause’. In fact, it does the exact opposite – THAT’s whats confusing to me about the censorship. Are people in NZ really so weak-minded or sick that they can possibly be ‘recruited’ by seeing that video or admire the shooter? And I think the shooter should get the fame that he seeks – to be remembered as an epic homicidal asshole for eternity. Not sure what the issue with that could possibly be.
Am I completely missing something here? I’m not suggesting in the least that homicide-porn should be promoted in any way or that anyone ‘needs’ to see it. But 10 years in prison? Did NZ have a similar ban on ISIS beheading videos?
VT wrote an article explaining possible motives as to why this was. They mentioned it was to discredit the extreme right wing Christian followers which they say Trump sympathizes with, as well as disarming a nation.
Its good to see a different perspective.
One thing we should keep in mind is the shooter was not a NZer; he was an Australian who I understand visited periodically (which isn’t unusual given our proximity). It seems he was not a part of and did not identify with this society. Thats current thinking.
The nation, and Christchurch in particular, is shocked – partly due to the facts of what happened, and partly because although we intellectually knew this could happen here, no-one believed it would. It seems to me he chose to do this act here for precisely that reason. I don’t know what effect he hoped to elicit, but what he achieved is probably the opposite. The attitude to him here can be summed in two words, and I believe the predominant opinion is he is a coward. The nation is being brought closer together as a people – not what I suspect he hoped for.
No, Kiwis are not especially weak. One shouldn’t mistake compassion for weakness. Yes, there may be arguments against censorship, but I still believe it has been imposed for the reasons stated above, or similar. Focus is not on him (at all) or the detail of his actions, but rather on the humans affected. His name is no longer mentioned here; the event will endure in infamy for the lessons to remember, but his name will be forgotten.
The gentleman facing a possible 10 year sentence: we don’t know what the court will find, and if there is a conviction we cannot predict the sentence with confidence. But there is a backstory (I wont elaborate here) that suggests he is either a threat or an idiot. It is for that reason he has been remanded in custody. We will see what the court decides in due course.
It seems to me the script has been well followed.
This shooter guy spent some time with al nusra, very recently, turns around and does this??
Does that not raise questions? How can one hate muslims so much and just previously spend time with the most radicals muslims…how did he survive?
This was a crime against muslims and new zealand.
Who benefits?
“…Focus is not on him (at all) or the detail of his actions, but rather on the humans affected…”
Not specific to the NZ event, but is this an intelligent, healthy response as a society to any mass shooting event or other act of terrorism?
At what point did society relegate the immune system of social consciousness to a secretive government that cannot prevent the disease or even acknowledge that they are incapable of preventing it? After the disease manifests, they are determined to do a thorough internal investigation to find the facts and then… I don’t know… act? They’ll issue a report, but it has to be heavily redacted for national security reasons? Sorry, you can understand my skepticism there.
Little people are constantly reminded that they shouldn’t discuss or speculate until the selected ‘facts’ are bestowed on them months later. In fact, they shouldn’t even think about it or [gasp] see anything about it unless filtered through the government or mainstream media. And that filtering produces the exact effect you mention: all the focus is on the victims. Like I need the government or MSM to remind me of the value of human life! In an even more bizarre extension of that, the US MSM is determined to convince us that victims are heroes or (far worse and sick) that their ‘sacrifice’ should, in a rather obtuse way, be memorialized an recognized as such. Sacrifice to who? Moloch? They were involuntarily and helplessly slaughtered by a psychopath. Full stop. There was no ‘sacrifice’.
Lesson in NZ the same as in the US:
– The government is the only one allowed to protect the little people. – If the government fails, it’s because the little people were unwilling to cede more rights, freedom and taxes to the government in exchange for a false sense of security. – Rather than understanding the evil after an act of terrorism, let’s instead focus on the value of the victims’ sacrifice and society’s’ loss. “Yeah, you couldn’t protect yourselves, but your lives really mean something. Honest!” – Little people must see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil. Unless its a report tot the government. The government will correctly define what is evil and decide how to deal with it. Like the cartoonized version of dictators the government trots out as a justification for regime change or repression.
I think I see where you are coming from, but it isn’t quite as you infer.
This is not US society. We do not think or act as Americans do. We don’t live in fear, even after last week. Victims are not heroes, they are victims, and need support. A compassionate society is not weak, it is strong.
This society is much more unified than US society (which seems disturbingly polarised). I want to talk to the Mayor? I go have a chat. I want to communicate with a government Minister? I can and do. Globally people talk of 6 degrees of separation; here we speak of 2. No-one can hide and everyone is connected. It creates a different sort of society.
What this week has shown me is that it is difficult to determine the facts on the ground and reality when you are not “in country”. Venezuela is another great example at present.
What I have also seen is the response of people from different countries; its not as you would expect, with some of the most extreme and deluded attitudes (conspiracy theorists, white supremacists, believers in simplistic dichotomies) coming from western nations, and most of the balanced responses from unexpected places – the world is not as we assume or as it is usually portrayed. Its very sad how scared people are, and what that fear does to them.
“…We don’t live in fear, even after last week…”
You realize the title of the article you’re posting is: ZERO HEDGE, LIVELEAK BLOCKED, SHARERS WARNED OF JAIL AS NEW ZEALAND CENSORS MOSQUE ATTACK VIDEO
Zero Hedge didn’t even have the video, and LiveLeak as about 100,000 OTHER videos that have nothing to do with the shooting. It seems your telcos did this ‘for their customers’ safety’ without being ordered to. How many other sites did your telcos ban? ZH was probably banned just for reporting on the censorship. This is heavy-handed big brother paranoia by any definition of the word. You’re making the case that the average person isn’t particularly afraid – that’s true everywhere.
“…A compassionate society is not weak, it is strong…”
You said that in your earlier reply, yet your country is willing to take away 10 years of someone’s life if they wanted to see the video FOR ANY REASON. Some may have doubts about the official narrative or whatever. Ten years. That’s for mere ‘knowing possession’.
You know that your browser and media apps have caches, right? And people in NZ must know that a deleted file is still on their hard drive even if they empty the recycle bin. So 10 years in the slammer if you clicked on a link (knowingly or not) that had that video and didn’t scrub any traces of it from your machine.
What’s next – suspected possession? NZ telcos probably have logs of everyone that watched or downloaded the video. Sounds like a perfect opportunity to round up a few computers for ‘examination’.
“…Every time a person downloads objectionable material onto their screen, there is the potential for a possession offence having been committed….”
Compassionate NZ people – with elected Stazi overlords ‘protecting’ them. Yeah, I couldn’t possibly understand that here in the US.
“…Anybody who knowingly makes or knowingly trades, distributes, or displays an objectionable publication via the Internet can receive a maximum of 14 years imprisonment…”
Ahhh… I see an extra 4 years if you had a dumb conspiracy theory blog and wanted to point out something in a few frames of the video, because now you’ve 1) made, 2) distributed and 3) displayed objectionable material. Hell, maybe you just wanted to point out what a coward the killer was by a snip from one of the videos.
I realize all of NZ has about five million citizens and the people are a bit more down-to-earth, Lobjidutu. It’s not nearly the looney bin run by psychopaths like the US is today. So why do NZ telcos and its government act like the Stazi here in the US?
I understand the way you’re thinking about this from inside NZ, but it seems like damn heavy-handed and repressive mass punishment to the rest of the world. The reasons given by your government are simply inadequate – it’s the kind of knee-jerk response those less-compassionate, fearful types in the west would use.
Its my understanding that it is sharing of the video that is being targeted, not viewing. This particular video has been categorised with an equivalence to child pornography. I am not familiar with that Act, but our legislation nowadays includes an opening section concerning intent that helps the courts in interpretation. Ultimately the courts determine the law via discovery. The courts will determine in each case whether there is guilt that warrants imprisonment, and one would expect that turns around intent and perceived threat. Some poor boob who watches a video out of curiosity is not under threat of anything more than ridicule.
Commenters on ZH were posting links to the video. ZH was blocked for about 4 days, but its recognised that blocking an entire site because of a few links is extreme. This to my knowledge is the first time such overt censorship has been applied here. Its early days, but there will be a lot of debate over the next few months about this aspect of the event. Was it appropriate? What guidelines are required? Telco responsibility and guidelines and liabilities? There is a reluctance to block news sites of any stripe, and although that happened, there is a desire to avoid that in the future. This all segues into the international discussion around media site self-filtering and censorship. Its easier for one society to set internal rules than for the development of international guidelines. Freedom of speech and alternative views vs public safety. No decision will be free from criticism.
Every media outlet displays bias, so I don’t personally think any of them can be trusted to show balance in self-censorship. So who do you trust to filter out the most extreme objectionable material on the internet, especially given perceptions of “objectionable” vary? How do you eliminate political bias? I don’t know.
Back to this video. Clearly here the government decided the video and manifesto of this nut are his real weapons. This view seems to have the support of local psychologists. The government decided in very short order to attempt to disarm the guy by eliminating these media weapons. I acknowledge the free speech argument and issues of precedence, but sitting here a week later I personally support what they attempted. This guy attacked my country and my way of life, and I support wrecking his plans any way possible. Not everyone here agrees, so as I said, there will be debate on the subject.
Beneath all the compassion and support being shown to each other (pretty much everyone in Christchurch knows someone affected, if not affected directly), we are pretty angry.
Anyway, thanks for the discussion.
Its said and often seen, that people too often are inspired to copy things. We have seen the spreading of ISIS as a good example.
So how many times 50 killed muslims in the world, do You wish for. I am sure many more then You would like more details, but that the reason.
I am not like that and dont need those killings as well as their family members probatly dont want to see them killed live in the same way as You.
I hope You can see that. I think I already has seen too many of any kind.
“We have seen the spreading of ISIS as a good example.” ISIS is your own Nato – get it into your head. No Nato – no ISIS. ISIS only spreads if commanded by Nato to do so. And since you are fighting for Nato, you are fighting for ISIS – and therefore you are fighting for the cause of the head-choppers:
‘European citizens who were encouraged to join the armed struggle in Syria alongside the pro-Western mercenaries can not be pursued for collaboration with the enemy as long as they can claim the support of NATO and its member-states.’ https://www.voltairenet.org/article205314.html
The reason they removed it is because they butched the false flag attack:
1. At 6:53 into the video you can clearly see a rifle magazine that was preplanted for him on the ground in the mosque. He picks up that same clip at around the 8:30 mark.
2. After the 14 minute mark he’s having a conversation with a second person who is in the car with him.
3. All initial reports from the prime minister to head of police to the media repeatedly stated that 3 other people have been arrested with at least 2 being directly related to the incident yet they have so far failed to provide any additional info.
Who says he is having a conversation? He is simply speaking on livestream to people who are listening then or to future video watchers.
No you can hear two different voices in the car. Listen again carefully.
If only the Democratic People’s Republic of New Zealand had been this diligent before the attack. And the extreme irony is, they are doing EXACTLY what this moron wanted them to do. Which goes to show that the OUTRAGE brigade never reads or studies or watches what they are outraged about. They just rage what their groupthink has decided they should rage about.
It ain’t democratic and it ain’t a republic. I wish.
New Zealand is pathetic, we don’t have a clue how to handle such an event. All we’re doing in burying our heads in the sand and singing kumbya, I’ve never been more ashamed to be a New Zealander.
Got a passport? We have flying machines called airliners now that can fly sooo far away. You only need a few hundy for a one way ticket….
Or you can stay and state your case publicly for what you believe the response should be. Up to you.
Yeah, the hasbaRats are out in packs this days, not only them but the Alphabet soup of drooling idiots is aslo cramming the comentary fields regarding the Black op in CC NZ, and its packed with contradictions and some downright bad made fakes, like one so briliantly put it, cartriges that biodegrades before they have flewn an meter, and then diapears into what, an parallel reality, huh, etc, etc, etc.
So to my rant, this must be crystal clear, this is what make and made me cock shure it is and was an FF, was incinsitencys, in any cort anywhere as far I can judge in the known universe, one thing the f…. must be clear, if ONE thing/image/event is fake, the case of dead, and should be thrown out as an failed aproatch because the One thing is sufficient, I dont even care about the rest, it maybe an excersise, I have been thru them My self, I even waded around screaming with an 5 f. pole straight thru my body and blood cousing thru my mouth and yes, fake blood to, another epic failure, if you didnt know it and just ariwed you would not think this was not false, until you see the rest, an Civil defence ex. in the form of an buss acisdent. The same type excerise as the one we have been vitnesing.
I have been in the army, aka as an conscripted cannon fodder (vassdalen rasshøler), an MG3eer, yeah, I know real fire from fake fire, do you get it, dont think we are idiots, NZ whatever Gov. The same video with the cartriges, have NO mussle flame, and after empting an clip, even in semi-auto will make the barrel hot, and steam will be shown, even if it little. Any military man knows this and yet nobody ugh….. sees that. Tsk, tsk, tsk, the sole reason for this spectaculare idiotic ban, is just for that, they screwed it, and now they try to hide it, there are truckloads of this kinds of Videos. When you are shoot, with an high speed amo, from close range, its the same as hitting the body with an sledge hammer, its an massive force in an smal area, and also the second dangerous thing in an closed confirment quarter, as an house, is richocets. that one kill as much in an battlefield as direct hit from an rifle, in fact richocets are really dangerous and do notise if there is some in this video at all, and so on. Yeah, hurmf.
Jesus, aphabet soup craut heads are getting dumber day by day. I am not impressed, shitheads.
peace
Proof of the false flag:
1. At 6:53 into the shooting video you can clearly see a rifle magazine that was preplanted for him on the ground in the mosque. He later picks up that same magazine at around the 8:30 mark.
2. After the 14 minute mark he’s having a conversation with a second person who is in the car with him.
3. All initial reports from the prime minister to head of police to the media repeatedly stated that 3 other people have been arrested with at least 2 being directly related to the incident yet they have so far failed to provide any additional info.
Here comes the censorship, now we know why this intel agency organised false flag murder spree was necessary. This shooter is highly trained Mossad no doubt about it, and I will be surprised if his real name is Brenton Tarrant. In 2011 a Mossad operation in Christchurch was unmasked. NZ is the current test-bed for cracking down on freedom of speech which threatens israel’s interests. Ironically this is exactly the time to ALLOW freedom of speech if you want to have a better society. But that is why the sharing of the shooting video had to made a crime – this will make all hate and fear fester much worse and can even lead to further overt violence (increased state violence against ordinary people through summary laws is a given). This video should be shown to people time and again so they understand how the elites are trying to enslave them. It would also make it sink in that taking guns AWAY from people will make them more exposed and unable to defend themselves. If someone was shooting back at this coward of a shooter, most casualties would have been avoided. It is as simple as that.
“Cracking down on freedom of speech”, yes that is # 1 Hence forth any criticism of Islam will be labelled as ‘hate speech’ and anti – Semitic. If you have read the “manifesto”, it is designed to degrade White’s as crazy racists.
THE NEW ZEALAND MANIFESTO – The Burning Platform https://www.theburningplatform.com/2019/03/16/the-new-zealand-manifesto/#more-193310
If it was fake I would love to know where all those people are now. Have they been whisked away from all their families forever? Their children will go to school for evermore and never see their mother or father again simply because their parent was involved in a psyop operation and was paid? Which parent will do that? I call bullshit. It was real.