0 $
2,500 $
5,000 $
600 $
OCTOBER 2024

US Nuclear Doctrine – Attack Everyone At Once

Support SouthFront

US Nuclear Doctrine – Attack Everyone At Once

Click to see the full-size image

Written by Drago Bosnic, independent geopolitical and military analyst

Strategic deterrence is one of the most important aspects of any global power’s/superpower’s security architecture. Countries such as Russia and the US have the world’s largest stockpiles of thermonuclear weapons, meaning that their ability to inflict untold damage on anyone is absolutely unparalleled. However, despite this, not even such superpowers should focus entirely on the military part of their doctrine, but on maintaining normal communication with other nuclear-armed states and ensuring that the world at least doesn’t get destroyed because of some trivial miscalculation. However, the United States seems to have other ideas. Namely, despite its perpetual, unprecedented aggression against the entire world, Washington DC is also responsible for creating the most dangerous strategic situation the world has ever seen, one that could easily result in the total annihilation of humanity.

America is the only country on Earth that has a plan to wage a simultaneous nuclear war with three nuclear-armed states – Russia, China and North Korea. Back in March, the US government adopted a new nuclear strategy that addresses this possibility, pushing for a more “decisive” response by the Pentagon. This extremely important document is updated approximately every four years, meaning that its changes are highly classified. According to The New York Times, this new strategy is “the first to examine in detail whether the United States is prepared to respond to nuclear crises that break out simultaneously or sequentially, with a combination of nuclear and non-nuclear weapons”. This was previously underscored by Pranay Vaddi, Special Presidential Assistant and Senior Director for Arms Control, Disarmament, and Nonproliferation at the National Security Council (NSC).

Vaddi and other high-ranking US officials, particularly those from the NSC, have publicly discussed the strategy changes, with Vaddi stating back in June that the plan underscores “the necessity to deter Russia, China and North Korea”, all at the same time. Another important change is also the fact that Moscow isn’t considered the sole strategic threat to the US, as this now applies to China as well. And while Russia’s strategic arsenal, the world’s most powerful, is still considered the primary threat to America, for the very first time, the strategy places significant emphasis on China. The US military projects that Beijing’s nuclear arsenal could grow from around 500 warheads to 1,500 by 2035, which is still a long way to go, as well as an effort that will require enormous investment in the military and a massive change in China’s nuclear/strategic doctrine, as Beijing would be tripling its current thermonuclear arsenal.

What’s more, in doing so, China would also be switching from a highly defensive strategic posture to an offensive one. However, despite this growing arsenal, it still remains a fraction of the stockpiles held by Washington DC and Moscow. In comparison, according to the latest data by the Federation of American Scientists, the US is in possession of exactly 5,044 warheads, 1,419 of which are deployed, while Russia has 5,580, with 1,549 deployed. In other words, both superpowers already have the number of deployed warheads that China’s entire arsenal is expected to reach no sooner than 2035, while it will still be three to four times smaller overall. However, the US is determined to push Beijing into a Cold War-like competition regardless. China’s minimalistic approach to strategic deterrence seems to be “too pacifist” for the US, which is why it’s doing everything in its power to push Beijing into an arms race.

On the other hand, thanks to America’s constant crawling aggression in Europe, it has pushed the “old continent” into a confrontation with Russia, prompting the latter to reassess its nuclear doctrine. This also puts the New START treaty, the sole remaining arms control agreement between Moscow and Washington DC, in jeopardy, as nothing indicates it would be prolonged after it expires in 2026. The treaty limits deployed warheads to 1,550 in both countries, which is why more than 70% of their arsenals are effectively dormant. This is bound to change in less than a year and a half, when there will be no restrictions on the deployment of strategic weapons. Simultaneously, the US also keeps antagonizing North Korea, pushing it to enter a direct military alliance with Russia, resulting in the effective unification of their strategic arsenals, as an attack on one would now legally be considered an attack on both.

On the other hand, although China’s arsenal is much smaller than America’s, it’s still more than enough to ensure the destruction of the continental US. Despite this, warmongers and war criminals in Washington DC won’t stop talking about an “inevitable war” with Beijing in the foreseeable future. Not to mention that the US still firmly believes it would “win” such a conflict. For its part, China has consistently been warning against such escalation and has repeatedly tried establishing more reasonable relations with the US to avoid the most catastrophic scenario. Unfortunately, Washington DC remains obstinate, forcing Beijing to take Pyongyang’s path of building closer ties with Moscow to ensure stronger strategic deterrence against possible US aggression. All this is pushing the world into tripwire alliances that are eerily similar to those that existed before and during world wars.

The results of such developments are very well known. We can read them in history books. However, there’s a very important distinction between then and now. Namely, the tripwire alliances of our age are all nuclear-armed, meaning that a potential global confrontation could be over in mere hours. It’s precisely thanks to US/NATO aggression against the world that around 950 million Americans, Canadians and Europeans are the target of the strategic arsenals of that same world. Because of its propensity to attack and destroy countries, groups of countries and even entire global regions, the political West has brought this upon itself, as much (if not most) of the world simply doesn’t want to take any risk by trusting the US/NATO. The only way to make sure that the political West is kept in check is to arm yourself with the most destructive weapons ever devised and aim them at Washington DC, Brussels, London, etc.

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

Support SouthFront

SouthFront

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Martillo

as mr lavrov explained to the washing town sewer critters their nuclear war will not be confined to their euro minions and their collapsing “democracies”. $lumville will be at the top of the list should the no longer great $atan start any attack with nukes. z

hash
hashed
IMHO

blah blah blah. fear and bullshit.

hash
hashed
Skip 59

it’s malarkey..😃

Conan M

“yes”… attack everyone at once and “die” as well!… all i ask is that before my home (washington d.c.) is turned into the largest crater that will resemble the moon’s south pole–aitken basin from multiple rsm-56 impact(s), i get to watch i$rael imploded “first”!…

Last edited 1 month ago by Conan M
Nimrod

the united states. britain and france are posing grave danger to world peace and will be making the prediction about man-made climate change in the next decade a reality. the united states is especially dangerous because it is already sacrificing europe to cope with its disastrous economy.

hash
hashed
BunkerDwellers

they are the ones spraying toxins in the sky for the whole planet with particles that resonate with radar etc so they can control the weather. as i have seen, there are many countries on the planet including russia who are participating in the insanity. the crops were bad this year from all of the stuff they have sprayed and who knows or cares what the longterm effects will be. they are deliberately poisoning everyone with toxins in everything. not even a whimper from the dumbass sheep.

Jewish pimp

usual drago”s bs.

hash
hashed
anon

in the 1960s the us tried to develop a bomb that was so powerful just one would destroy the whole of russia. the russians went one better and had a plan to develop a single bomb that would destroy the whole planet. the idea was that if there was a successful us sneak attack, this monster bomb would be sailing up and down the coast on a big cargo ship, and the matelots on board would light the blue touch paper and spoil the big parties going on in washington.

WW-3?

biden who holds the launch codes could be seen yesterday on a beach in a stupor starring off into space more frightening is the absolute idiot preparing to take his place

hash
hashed
BunkerDwellers

neither of them run anything at all but their own feet. their mouths are co-opted by their handlers. if you have seen isaac kappy’s video of the scantily dressed young asian girls in an opulent marble building, the people who own that are the ones running the government. maybe the casual inhumanity makes more sense.

Last edited 1 month ago by BunkerDwellers
Usajewcessapool

ronald mcdonald is the cancer of the world

hash
hashed
BunkerDwellers

a plan cooked up by a bunch of child raping pedophiles who peddle their filth across the secure lines of the military. using the doomsday line for like assassinations from the very beginning. does anyone expect anything less than the most insane and evil things from them and their ziopig masters?

hash
hashed
bert33

doctrine schmoctrine. deterrence. if someone launches at the us, they die. period. mad. no one wins a nuclear conflict, everybody dies. jerkoffs overseas and online who like to fantasize about that stuff, take note, there will be no ice cram or internet or electronic money or like that, probably ever again. so, calm your hip and be peaceful. iran, you too.

hash
hashed
13
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x