Click to see the full-size image
Written by Patrick Poppel, expert at the Center for Geostrategic Studies (Belgrade)
After the talks between the party leaders of the FPÖ, ÖVP and SPÖ, Federal President Alexander Van der Bellen is scheduled to receive Herbert Kickl, Karl Nehammer and Andreas Babler on Monday. After his meeting with Nehammer, Kickl continued to woo the ÖVP. But ÖVP leader and SPÖ leader Babler continued to rule out a coalition with the Freedom Party under Kickl.
A week and a half ago, Van der Bellen called on the representatives of the three parties with the largest number of votes to reliably clarify what kind of mutual cooperation is fundamentally possible. In the National Council election on September 29th, the FPÖ came in first, ahead of the ÖVP and SPÖ. The two-party coalition with the most seats would be made up of the Freedom Party and the People’s Party.
Together, the ÖVP and SPÖ would only have one mandate surplus, which could make a corresponding two-party coalition difficult and would make the inclusion of a third partner likely. But a man from the ÖVP is putting pressure on the Federal President. If the ÖVP boss in Styria, Christopher Drexler, has his way, the FPÖ boss should receive the order from the Federal President to form a government.
Giving the first contract to form a government to the first place candidate after the election is “democratic practice” in Austria, said Drexler. Meanwhile, the liberal forces of the Green Party and NEOS are also trying to get into a coalition.
The entire political situation in Austria for two weeks clearly shows us that the votes are only one factor in the formation of a possible government. The coalition negotiations and the agreements behind the doors are much more important.
The role of the Federal President and the leaders of the other parties goes against the will of many voters. It is very likely that there will be a coalition of losers in Austria. For many months there was repeated opposition to the FPÖ’s possible participation in the government.
The question is whether such social behavior is still in connection with the values of democracy. These developments also show which psychological mechanisms are used by the “parties of the system”. Fear is spread and the opponent is defamed.
It would actually be the role of the neutral Federal President to criticize such campaigns and admonish those responsible. The current attempts to prevent the FPÖ from participating in the federal government are the last step by the established system, which desperately wants to maintain its power.
Despite all the campaigns of its political opponents, the FPÖ managed to come to first place in the elections. The effect on other patriotic parties in Europe is enormous. But now they want to prevent this party from taking part in a government.
It is a signal that will be sent to the patriotic forces in the other states of Europe. Despite the support of the people and the decision at the ballot box, they are able to prevent participation in government.
This strategy now also proves that it is actually not a fight between different parties, but the fight of the system against the opposition. The prevention of the FPÖ’s participation in the government is again a good example of the processes in the political landscape in Austria.
With the NEOS (as before with Team Stronach) we have a party that was made out of nothing by a single Austrian oligarch to create another oppositional force. The Green Party only remains in existence because it benefits from the widespread climate debate.
The SPÖ is intensively seeking the votes of integrated migrants. The ÖVP receives a lot of votes, especially in rural regions of Austria, because people there believe that this party is committed to conservative values and support for the economy. But the days when this party was a guarantee for this are long gone, and this information did not reach the voters.
The fact is that the FPÖ can increasingly develop into a centrist party and could take the place of the people’s party. The election clearly showed what the voters want, but the system has other plans for Austria.
In Austria, people will have to forgo their chosen party in the government. This shows very well what understanding of democracy those responsible in the other parties have. But what is much more important is the effect of this action on the opposition forces in the other EU states. The system in Austria has set an example, but that is a sign of shame.
MORE ON THE TOPIC:
democracy in the west can’t be on decline as it never existed. global elites were always the same scumbags. the only difference was that after ww2 former west (not existing anymore) competed with the ussr and former eastern bloc so they really put a lot of effort to look as better regime then communists. but now they needn’t to play this game anymore and they are showing their true face. rothschilds never allowed any democracy and assassination of kennedy should be dire warning for everybody.
the illusion of democracy in the west will never return. it was systematically killed together with kennedy, vietnam war, 11.9. and the covid. and many other actions of the deep state. the true reason why the global elites want to kill any freedom is white heterosexual man, economically independent and smart. they need to replace white intelligent men with brainless mobs. muslims for example. or women activists. or lgbt activists. or green activists. and the process is already finished.
interestingly, half of the white population in the west actively participated in the great replacement program, especially germany, france, britain and other wannabe superpowers on decline. the former eastern bloc had more antibodies against the communists, but the new generations are all the same. maybe hungary has at least some instinct of self-preservation, but austria are green idiots which are no longer suitable even as food for worms